1 / 10

Solar Radiation Physical Modeling (SRPM)

Solar Radiation Physical Modeling (SRPM). J. Fontenla June 30, 2005b. Mean Intensity. Emitted Spectra. Radiative Losses. and Net Radiative. Brackett. Atomic. Molecular. Continua. Continua. Atomic Data. Radiative Transfer. Molecular Data. Non-LTE. Molecular. Atomic.

whoopi-estrada
Télécharger la présentation

Solar Radiation Physical Modeling (SRPM)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Solar Radiation Physical Modeling (SRPM) J. FontenlaJune 30, 2005b

  2. Mean Intensity Emitted Spectra Radiative Losses and Net Radiative Brackett Atomic Molecular Continua Continua Atomic Data Radiative Transfer Molecular Data Non-LTE Molecular Atomic Lines Lines Populations & Ionization Balance Populations & Ionization Atmospheric Parameters Momentum & Energy Balance

  3. Critical Next Steps • Adjust photospheric models and abundances • Low first-ionization-potential (FIP) contribute to ne and photospheric opacity • High FIP are needed for upper layers • Re-think lower chromosphere • Account for radio data showing Tmin<4200 K • Account for UV continua from SOHO-SUMER showing high Tmin • Account for molecular lines (CN, CH, CO) showing low Tmin • Re-think upper chromosphere with current abundances and observations • Re-compute transition region with updated abundances, atomic data, diffusion and flows, and energy-balance • MHD, full-NLTE, 3D simulations of chromospheric variations • Prominence eruptions-CMEs

  4. Low Chromosphere Issues Fe & C abundance seem good C I line But computed CN lines are not good. Are abundances incorrect? Or is the model chromosphere incorrect?

  5. H Ionization and Ly Alpha Line

  6. V1.5 Ly Computed Profiles • Continuum too high due to Sulphur continuum • Not enough contrast for faculae and plage • Umbra profile has reversal unlike the observed

  7. For each species and ionization stage Trace Species Ionization • Or split the abundance and ionization

  8. Chromospheric Magnetic Heating Mechanism Farley-Buneman Threshold Term U, JHall E,JPed B Uthr=Cs(1+ψ)

  9. Prominence-Eruption-CME • 3-D non-LTE radiative transfer & MHD modeling • Instrumentation for observing Doppler spectra, spatial- and temporal-evolution

More Related