1 / 39

Constructing (Ir-)Rationality: An Analytical Framework

Constructing (Ir-)Rationality: An Analytical Framework. Nikki Slocum-Bradley Prepared for: Beyond Rationality Workshop Center for the Philosophy of Natural and Social Sciences LSE – 21 November 2009. Meaning Construction. Rationality & morality are closely linked.

willa
Télécharger la présentation

Constructing (Ir-)Rationality: An Analytical Framework

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Constructing (Ir-)Rationality:An Analytical Framework Nikki Slocum-Bradley Prepared for: Beyond Rationality Workshop Center for the Philosophy of Natural and Social Sciences LSE – 21 November 2009 United Nations University - Comparative Regional Integration Studies UNU-CRIS

  2. Meaning Construction Rationality & morality are closely linked. Both are inherent to meaning construction Examples from the Holocaust (Re-)Framing / defining / evoking a social paradigm How is meaning constructed? Are there universal features and/or components?

  3. Social Forces Rights & Duties Storylines Positioning Diamond: The building blocks of meaning Identities

  4. Social Forces Social Forces of (discursive) acts: the significance of what an actor says or does. We use social forces to evoke the other elements of the Positioning Diamond.

  5. Storylines Storylines are the narrative conventions that structure both how we give accounts of events as well as how we experience them (and not others) as adhering together in an episode. Entails what is going on (descriptive) and what is conceived as the goal of actions.

  6. Identities Identities are meanings applied to persons or other narrated actors in specific contexts. They comprise 2 related aspects: A) the definition of the actor(s) B) the characteristics ascribed to the actor(s)

  7. Rights & Duties Implicitly inherent to the evocation of specific identities, within the context of a given storyline, is the assignment of sets of rights and duties to the actors. These encompass formal rights and obligations and normative conventions.

  8. Positioning Analysis: Holocaust Example I Storyline: ‘Dirty work’ I.D.s: Soldiers are fellow workers Rs&Ds: Workers have duty to do their fair share of the ‘dirty work’.  Killing Jews is helping with the dirty work, and thus fulfilling one’s duty.

  9. Positioning Analysis: Holocaust Example II Storyline: Mercy killings I.D.s: Chilren are destitute, helpless. Soldiers are saviors. Rs&Ds: Soldiers’ duty to help children.  Killing children is putting them out of their misery, so the soldier fulfills his duty.

  10. Criteria for a Rational Act For an action to be considered ‘rational’ it must be defined as an act that • conforms with the evoked narrative conventions (coheres with SL), and • conforms with the moral code evoked (consistent with the duties and rights assigned to the actor performing the act)

  11. Repair Work She didn’t reply to your question because:

  12. Repair Work She didn’t reply to your question because: …she didn’t hear you.

  13. Repair Work She didn’t reply to your question because: …she didn’t hear you. …she doesn’t speak English.

  14. Repair Work She didn’t reply to your question because: …she didn’t hear you. …she doesn’t speak English. …she didn’t want to admit that she doesn’t know the answer.

  15. Repair Work She didn’t reply to your question because: …she didn’t hear you. …she doesn’t speak English. …she didn’t want to admit that she doesn’t know the answer. …she was late for another meeting.

  16. Repair Work She didn’t reply to your question because: …she didn’t hear you. …she doesn’t speak English. …she didn’t want to admit that she doesn’t know the answer. …she was late for another meeting. …she is mean.

  17. Repair Work She didn’t reply to your question because: …she didn’t hear you. …she doesn’t speak English. …she didn’t want to admit that she doesn’t know the answer. …she was late for another meeting. …she is mean. …she is crazy (irrational).

  18. Levels of Discourse Level 1: Content – Who & what the narrator is talking about. (Can include Meadian ‘me’) Level 2:Narrator-Interlocutor – What the narrator & interlocutor are doing, their identities, rights & duties. (Meadian ‘I’) Level 3:Ideological – What are the relevant wider social issues & players?

  19. Positioning Diamond Analytical Grid

  20. Swiss Election Campaign Poster (SVP)

  21. Positioning Analysis of SVP Campaign Poster

  22. Response to Election Campaign Poster (I)

  23. Response to Election Campaign Poster (II)

  24. Positioning Analysis of Reaction Posters

  25. From Principle to Plan: The Analytical Process STEP 1: Establishing a Meaning System (Pos Diamond) A) A narrative context is evoked (‘storyline’); B) Certain identities are evoked within this context; C) Rights and duties are allocated to actors. • A,B & C are evoked through discursive acts. STEP 2: Determine the appropriate/rational Act (based upon rights & duties assigned) STEP 3: Interpret specific actionsas manifestations of the act. This includes evoking identities for the actors.

  26. From Principle to Plan: Example I STEP 1: Establishing a Meaning System (Pos Diamond) A) Storyline: Securing Switzerland B) Identities: Swiss: good; Foreigners: bad, threats, criminals C) R&Ds: Swiss have duty to protect Switzerland STEP 2: Determine the appropriate/rational Act Rational act: Remove ‘foreigners’ from Switzerland STEP 3: Interpret specific actionsas manifestations of the act. This includes evoking identities for the actors.

  27. From Principle to Plan: Example I STEP 1: Establishing a Meaning System (Pos Diamond) A) Storyline: Securing Switzerland B) Identities: Swiss: good; Foreigners: bad, threats, criminals C) R&Ds: Swiss have duty to protect Switzerland STEP 2: Determine the appropriate/rational Act Rational act: Remove ‘foreigners’ from Switzerland STEP 3: Interpret specific actionsas manifestations of the act. This includes evoking identities for the actors. Possible actions: Put ‘foreigners’ on a bus toward border;

  28. From Principle to Plan: Example I STEP 1: Establishing a Meaning System (Pos Diamond) A) Storyline: Securing Switzerland B) Identities: Swiss: good; Foreigners: bad, threats, criminals C) R&Ds: Swiss have duty to protect Switzerland STEP 2: Determine the appropriate/rational Act Rational act: Remove ‘foreigners’ from Switzerland STEP 3: Interpret specific actionsas manifestations of the act. This includes evoking identities for the actors. Possible actions: Put ‘foreigners’ on a bus toward border; Shoot ‘foreigners’ on sight.

  29. From Principle to Plan: Example II STEP 1: Establishing a Meaning System (Pos Diamond) A) Storyline: Securing Switzerland B) Identities: Swiss: good; Foreigners: bad, threats, criminals C) R&Ds: Swiss have duty to protect Switzerland STEP 2: Determine the appropriate/rational Act Rational act: Restrict ‘foreigners’’ entry into Switzerland STEP 3: Interpret specific actionsas manifestations of the act. This includes evoking identities for the actors.

  30. From Principle to Plan: Example II STEP 1: Establishing a Meaning System (Pos Diamond) A) Storyline: Securing Switzerland B) Identities: Swiss: good; Foreigners: bad, threats, criminals C) R&Ds: Swiss have duty to protect Switzerland STEP 2: Determine the appropriate/rational Act Rational act: Restrict ‘foreigners’’ entry into Switzerland STEP 3: Interpret specific actionsas manifestations of the act. This includes evoking identities for the actors. Possible actions: Refuse to issue visas.

  31. From Principle to Plan: Example II STEP 1: Establishing a Meaning System (Pos Diamond) A) Storyline: Securing Switzerland B) Identities: Swiss: good; Foreigners: bad, threats, criminals C) R&Ds: Swiss have duty to protect Switzerland STEP 2: Determine the appropriate/rational Act Rational act: Restrict ‘foreigners’’ entry into Switzerland STEP 3: Interpret specific actionsas manifestations of the act. This includes evoking identities for the actors. Possible actions: Refuse to issue visas. Put ‘foreigners’ crossing border illegally on a bus.

  32. From Principle to Plan: Example II STEP 1: Establishing a Meaning System (Pos Diamond) A) Storyline: Securing Switzerland B) Identities: Swiss: good; Foreigners: bad, threats, criminals C) R&Ds: Swiss have duty to protect Switzerland STEP 2: Determine the appropriate/rational Act Rational act: Restrict ‘foreigners’’ entry into Switzerland STEP 3: Interpret specific actionsas manifestations of the act. This includes evoking identities for the actors. Possible actions: Refuse to issue visas. Put ‘foreigners’ crossing border illegally on a bus. Shoot ‘foreigners’ crossing border illegally on sight.

  33. Challenging Rationality • The ‘rationality’ of this analytical process can be challenged at each interpretive step (and their parts). (We must secure Switzerland, but reforming the sheep is the solution. OR ‘Switzerland is secure enough.’) • Some challenges will take the form of a normative/ethical challenge. (‘We could remove foreigners by bus or bullet, but the latter would be extreme.’) • Other challenges can target the identities evoked. (‘We must oust the bad sheep, but not all foreigners are bad.’)

  34. Example: Rwandan Genocide RTLM journalist: ‘If Hutus unite and understand that Tutsis should abandon their thirst for power forever, then clearly no foreigner will rule Rwanda. We are the ones who should rule, in full democracy. It is therefore clear that if one ethnic group in the country takes an uncompromising stand while it constitutes the minority, the majority cannot roam around asking for help saying that the minority ethnic group has attacked them. This would be utter foolishness. This is disgraceful in the eyes of the international community, which says that if an ethnic group rises against us, we should fight back and subjugate it, and if we lose, we should allow it to govern. It is then impossible for the Tutsi minority, which is 8%, to defeat the Hutus and to rule the country just because it is backed by Museveni.’ United Nations University - Comparative Regional Integration Studies UNU-CRIS

  35. Example: Rwandan Genocide – Redressing an alleged transgression ‘They are hard to please, they are wicked… It is obvious that they were created to gulp our Rwandan blood and to kill. It is in their nature. It is thus a waste of time to continue pleading with them… Let them take up guns, we will do the same. Let the Inyenzi’s fate be sealed, as is already the case. …So, we have no other choice but to fight the Inyenzi-Inkotanyi and to exterminate them.’ (Valérie Bemeriki, RTLM Tape no 0035 (KT00-0876), 20/06/1994) United Nations University - Comparative Regional Integration Studies UNU-CRIS

  36. From Principle to Plan: Example from Rwanda STEP 1: Establishing a Meaning System (Pos Diamond) A) Storylines: ‘(Hutu) Majority Fights for Democracy’; ‘Attack on Rwandan National Sovereignty’ B) Identities: Hutus: Majority, Rwandan Tutsis: Minority, Foreigners C) R&Ds: Majority (Hutus): right to govern. Minority (Tutsis): Duty to submit to rule of the majority. Rwandans (Hutus): Right to sovereignty. Foreigners (Tutsis): Duty to respect sovereignty & not interfere. STEP 2: Determine the appropriate/rational Act STEP 3: Interpret specific actionsas manifestations of the act.

  37. From Principle to Plan: Example from Rwanda STEP 1: Establishing a Meaning System (Pos Diamond) A) Storylines: ‘(Hutu) Majority Fights for Democracy’; ‘Attack on Rwandan National Sovereignty’ B) Identities: Hutus: Majority, Rwandan Tutsis: Minority, Foreigners C) R&Ds: Majority (Hutus): right to govern. Minority (Tutsis): Duty to submit to rule of the majority. Rwandans (Hutus): Right to sovereignty. Foreigners (Tutsis): Duty to respect sovereignty & not interfere. STEP 2: Determine the appropriate/rational Act ‘Fight back’, ‘Subjugate’, ‘exterminate’ the cockroaches STEP 3: Interpret specific actionsas manifestations of the act.

  38. From Principle to Plan: Example from Rwanda STEP 1: Establishing a Meaning System (Pos Diamond) A) Storylines: ‘(Hutu) Majority Fights for Democracy’; ‘Attack on Rwandan National Sovereignty’ B) Identities: Hutus: Majority, Rwandan Tutsis: Minority, Foreigners C) R&Ds: Majority (Hutus): right to govern. Minority (Tutsis): Duty to submit to rule of the majority. Rwandans (Hutus): Right to sovereignty. Foreigners (Tutsis): Duty to respect sovereignty & not interfere. STEP 2: Determine the appropriate/rational Act ‘Fight back’, ‘Subjugate’, ‘exterminate’ the cockroaches STEP 3: Interpret specific actionsas manifestations of the act. Kill Tutsis

  39. Contact Information Dr. Nikki Slocum - Bradley UNU-CRIS c/o Grootseminarie Potterierei 72, 2nd floor B - 8000 Bruges Tel. +32 50 47 11 00 Fax +32 50 47 13 09 E-mail : NSlocum@cris.unu.edu http://www.cris.unu.edu United Nations University - Comparative Regional Integration Studies UNU-CRIS

More Related