1 / 20

CHAP. 6 COMPETENCY OF WITNESSES

CHAP. 6 COMPETENCY OF WITNESSES. P. JANICKE 2009. MODERN VIEW. NEARLY EVERYONE IS COMPETENT NEED SUFFICIENT ABILITY TO BE HELPFUL: TO OBSERVE TO REMEMBER TO RELATE. COUNTERWEIGHTS AGAIN.

william-walls
Télécharger la présentation

CHAP. 6 COMPETENCY OF WITNESSES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CHAP. 6COMPETENCY OF WITNESSES P. JANICKE 2009

  2. MODERN VIEW • NEARLY EVERYONE IS COMPETENT • NEED SUFFICIENT ABILITY TO BE HELPFUL: • TO OBSERVE • TO REMEMBER • TO RELATE Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  3. COUNTERWEIGHTS AGAIN • NOMINALLY COMPETENT TESTIMONY CAN BE KEPT OUT IF UNFAIRLY PREJUDICIAL, OR CONFUSING TO THE JURY, per RULE 403 • THIS IS OFTEN DONE RATHER THAN HOLDING THAT WIT. IS PER SE INCOMPETENT Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  4. OATH REQUIREMENT • HAS CHANGED OVER THE CENTURIES • “GOD” NO LONGER NEED BE MENTIONED • “SWEARING” NO LONGER NEED BE MENTIONED • SOME EXPRESSION OF DUTY AND COMMITMENT TO TELL THE TRUTH IS REQUIRED Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  5. SUBMISSION TO CROSS-EXAM • IS REQUIRED • WITNESS WHO REFUSES IN ADVANCE • WILL BE RULED INCOMPETENT IF THE ADVERSE PARTY SO MOVES • WILL BE HELD IN CONTEMPT IF THE SUMMONING PARTY SO MOVES • WITNESS WHO REFUSES AFTER DIRECT • WILL BE IN CONTEMPT • WILL HAVE HIS DIRECT STRICKEN Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  6. HYPNOTIZED WITNESSES • A CURRENTLY HYPNOTIZED WITNESS IS NOT COMPETENT • WHY ?? • COURTS ARE WARY EVEN OF HYPNOTIC REFRESHMENT OF MEMORY • HYPNOTICALLY REFRESHED WITNESS FOR D. CAN’T BE SUMMARILY KEPT OUT Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  7. “DEAD MAN’S” STATUTES • COMMON LAW: ALL WITNESSES WERE INCOMPETENT TO TESTIFY TO A CONVERSATION WITH A NOW-DECEASED PERSON, EVEN IF THE HEARSAY OBJECTION IS SOMEHOW OVERCOME • WAS THOUGHT UNFAIR, OR TEMPTING TO PERJURY Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  8. MOST STATES HAVE SOME VESTIGE OF THE RULE LEFT • TEXAS: • IF AN ESTATE IS A PARTY, NO PARTY CAN TESTIFY TO A CONVERSATION WITH DECEASED • UNLESS “CORROBORATED” OR ELICITED BY OTHER SIDE [R. 601(b)] • SAME RULE FOR GUARDIAN/WARD Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  9. THE HEARSAY RULE STILL NEEDS TO BE DEALT WITH, OR THE CONVERSATION WILL BE KEPT OUT ON THAT GROUND • WE HAVE A FEW HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT MIGHT APPLY HERE – • EXCITED UTTERANCES • STATEMENTS ABOUT WILLS • MORE LATER Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  10. LAWYER AS WITNESS • NO INCOMPETENCY RULE, BUT: • AN ETHICS RULE (NOT EVIDENCE RULE) PROHIBITS AN ADVOCATING LAWYER FROM TESTIFYING GENERALLY • IS THOUGHT TO GIVE HER TOO MUCH ADVANTAGE • SHE CAN TESTIFY ON UNCONTESTED POINTS • TO BE A GENERAL WITNESS, MUST WITHDRAW AS SPEAKING ADVOCATE; NOT DISQUALIFIED FROM THE CASE THOUGH • EXEMPTION FOR HARDSHIP TO CLIENT Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  11. JURORS AS WITNESSES:RULE 606 • RULE COVERS LIVE TESTIMONY • RULE COVERS AFFIDAVIT TESTIMONY • NEITHER IS RESTRICTED PRE-VERDICT • USUALLY HANDLED IN CAMERA Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  12. JURORS AS WITNESSES:POST-VERDICT • HEAVY RESTRICTIONS IN FEDERAL RULE 606 • ONLY WHERE TESTIMONY IS TO: • OUTSIDE INFLUENCE (BY PERSONS; e.g., THREATS, BRIBES) • EXTRANEOUS PREJUDICIAL INFO (e.g., NEWSPAPER ACCOUNTS) • MISTAKE IN ENTERING VERDICT ONTO FORM Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  13. EVEN WHERE ALLOWED, POST-VERDICT TESTIMONY CAN’T GET INTO IMPACT ON ANY JUROR’S MIND, OR INTO THE JURY’S DISCUSSIONS • THE JUDGE HAS TO SPECULATE Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  14. JURORS AS WITNESSES:TEXAS RULE 606 • NARROWER THAN FED. RULE • TESTIMONY CAN BE ONLY TO “OUTSIDE INFLUENCES” • PROBABLY SUBSUMES THE REDUNDANT “EXTRANEOUS PREJUDICIAL INFO” OPTION IN THE FEDERAL RULE • BUT: NO EXCEPTION FOR ERRORS IN VERDICT FORMS Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  15. OTHER POSSIBLE AVENUES UNDER TEXAS RULES: • IF # ON FORM IS TOO HIGH, MOVE FOR NEW TRIAL: EV. WON’T SUPPORT THE VERDICT AS IF APPEARS ON THE FORM • MOVE FOR JMOL – NO REASONABLE JURY COULD SAY THIS • MOST CASES: SEEM UNFIXABLE Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  16. AID FOR RECALLING THE RULE • PICTURE A CIRCLE AROUND THE JURORS DURING AND AFTER TRIAL • EVIDENCE OF THINGS COMING FROM OUTSIDE INTO THE CIRCLE IS O.K. • EVIDENCE OF WHAT TRANSPIRED INSIDE THE CIRCLE IS NOT ALLOWED AFTER VERDICT Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  17. EXAMPLE 1: JUROR SLEPT THROUGH TRIAL; ANOTHER WAS DRUNK THROUGHOUT TRIAL • POST-VERDICT TESTIMONY BY A 3RD JUROR NOT ALLOWED ON EITHER • FED. AND TEXAS RULES THE SAME Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  18. EXAMPLE 2: JUROR X TOLD OTHERS ABOUT HIS SPECIAL EXPERIENCE IN CRIME DETECTION; SEVERAL THEN CHANGED THEIR VOTES • A JUROR CANNOT TESTIFY POST-VERDICT TO THIS • AN INTERNAL MISCONDUCT MATTER; NOT “EXTRANEOUS” OR “OUTSIDE”) Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  19. EXAMPLE 3: • JUROR WENT TO SCENE AT NIGHT; TOLD OTHER JURORS WHAT HE SAW • IF THIS COMES UP POST- VERDICT: • A CLOSE QUESTION • 1ST HALF IS ADMISSIBLE: “EXTRANEOUS” MATTER GETTING INTO THE CIRCLE • 2ND HALF IS PROBABLY INADMISSIBLE INTRUSION INTO THE CIRCLE Chap. 6: Witness Competency

  20. “PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE” REQUIREMENT OF RULE 602 • WHAT DOES IT MEAN? • OBSERVED BY THE SENSES • NOT “PROCESSED” TOO MUCH • WHAT DOES IT EXCLUDE? • RECITATIONS LABELED “OPINION” • TEST. TO STATE OF MIND OR EMOTION OF ANOTHER PERSON Chap. 6: Witness Competency

More Related