1 / 18

Deep retrofits: You get what you pay for Leslie Kramer, Stanford University

Deep retrofits: You get what you pay for Leslie Kramer, Stanford University and Jonathan Schoenfeld, kW Engineering June 17, 2014 . Whole Building Energy Retrofit Program. Deep retrofits in highest energy using buildings on campus

willow
Télécharger la présentation

Deep retrofits: You get what you pay for Leslie Kramer, Stanford University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Deep retrofits: You get what you pay for Leslie Kramer, Stanford University and Jonathan Schoenfeld, kW Engineering June 17, 2014

  2. Whole Building Energy Retrofit Program • Deep retrofits in highest energy using buildings on campus • Maximizes energy savings in each building within cost-effectiveness criteria • Looks at a package of measures: no cream skimming • Big payoffs from in-depth energy audit, advanced control strategies, and relentless performance testing.

  3. WBERP Process Consulting Engineers Contractors Stanford Team

  4. Results • Savings of $3.5 million per year to date • Total cost $14.6 million to date • PG&E rebates of $2 million • Overall simple payback period under 4 years

  5. Case Study: Packard • $400,000/year energy cost • 3 stories and a basement • Faculty and grad student offices and dry labs • Built in 2000 • Chilled water, steam and electricity from Stanford’s central plant • 122,500 gross square feet • 4 Air Handlers, 212 VAV boxes • 12 fan coils for additional cooling • VAV boxes controlled by pneumatic thermostats • DDC control of air handlers INITIAL BASELINE CONDITIONS: NOT BAD!

  6. Energy Audit Process • ASHRAE Level I • Rough savings estimates • Go/No-Go decision for measure analysis • Level II (Measure Analysis) • Limited trend review • Calibrated eQUEST Model

  7. Audit Findings • No-cost Measures • Increase zone setpoints for unoccupied rooms • Schedule how water pumps • Low-cost Measures • Daylighting controls • Eliminate air handler heating coil operation when economizing • Zone Level DDC Conversion • Deadband thermostats • Pressure and Supply Air Temperature Resets • Zone scheduling and override

  8. Zone Level DDC Implementation Options • Design-Bid-Build • Develop request for proposal (RFP) for design • Develop design documents • Bid construction • Design-Build • Develop RFP • Bid design-construction • Design-Assist with Performance Specification • Energy consultant develops performance specification • Bid design-construction

  9. Performance Specification Development • Input from Multiple Parties • Stanford Facilities Energy Management Team • Stanford Energy Management & Control Systems (EMCS) • ACCO & Sunbelt Controls • kW Engineering • Key Contents: • Equipment specifications • Hardware installation including control hardware locations and wiring pathways • System integration • System architecture & control schematics • Sequence of operations

  10. Basis of Energy Savings Supply air temp. (SAT) and duct static pressure (DSP) setpoints Cooling, Heating, Damper Requests Airflows Existing DeltaV Control System SAT & Status Schedule & Setpoints VAV box w/ New DDC controls Existing Air Handling Unit (AHU)

  11. Ensuring Persistence of Performance

  12. Commissioning Findings (UPDATE Graphic)

  13. Verified Energy Savings Figure 3: Relationship between chilled water usage data and CDD

  14. Verified Energy Savings Figure 4: Relationship between steam usage data and HDD

  15. Verified Energy Savings

  16. Efficiency Measures Still Available • Global temperature adjustment • Occupancy based scheduling

  17. Take-Aways • Deeper savings require a comprehensive approach • Even relatively new buildings may have out-of-date control systems that are wasting energy • A detailed specification ensures maintenance and energy savings persist • Consider using energy-experts with input from all parties to specify, commission and verify control systems • Private, not-for -profit institution • 8,500 acres • Oldest buildings from 1890s • Santa Clara County is the main jurisdiction • >14 million square feet, 700 buildings • ~$70 million annual utilities spend

  18. Thank you for your time! QUESTIONS??

More Related