1 / 15

Presentation of Issue Paper

Presentation of Issue Paper. LAC 2008. Why One Issue?. The # 1 issue of the year – standards SNA did not support Chairman Harkin Many health groups on the other side – supporting the Chairman SNA credibility on the line for 2009. CREDIBILITY . SNA’S CREDIBILITY IS AT STAKE WITH STANDARDS.

xiang
Télécharger la présentation

Presentation of Issue Paper

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Presentation of Issue Paper LAC 2008

  2. Why One Issue? • The # 1 issue of the year – standards • SNA did not support Chairman Harkin • Many health groups on the other side – supporting the Chairman • SNA credibility on the line for 2009

  3. CREDIBILITY SNA’S CREDIBILITY IS AT STAKE WITH STANDARDS

  4. SNA’s GOALS on STANDARDS

  5. Eliminate “Time and Place” Rule – giving the Secretary of Agriculture the authority to regulate all foods and beverages • Apply the Dietary Guidelines to all foods and beverages sold on campus • Uniform national interpretation of Dietary Guidelines • Level playing field within the school on nutrition standards

  6. WHY UNIFORMITY ? • Kids need the same nutrients CA to SD to NY • Federal reimbursements are low—$2.47 for free—less than the cost of a latte • School food services need the revenue from competitive sales • A variety of state and local standards will increase costs for industry and school food services

  7. HARKIN AMENDMENT(as offered on the farm bill) • ELIMINATES TIME AND PLACE – Yes • NATIONAL UNIFORMITY – No • UNIFORMITY IN SCHOOL – No • ADDITIONAL FUNDING—No • FUNDING – No

  8. HARKIN COSPONSORS • Senator Murkowski (R-AK) • Senator Cornyn (R-TX) • Senator Carper (D-DE) • Senator Sanders (I-VT) • Senator Stevens (R-AK)

  9. HARKIN COSPONSORS • Senator Nelson (D-FL) • Senator Voinovich (R-OH) • Senator Brownback (R-KS) • Senator Schumer (D-NY) • Senator Casey (D-PA)

  10. HARKIN SUPPORTERS ORGANIZATIONS: • National Alliance for Nutrition and Activity (300 organizations--steering committee members, national organizations, and state/local organizations) • Steering Committee Members: • American Cancer Society • American Diabetes Association • American Dietetic Association • American Heart Association • American Public Health Association

  11. HARKIN SUPPORTERS (cont’d.) • Steering Committee Members, Continued: • Association of State and Territorial Public Health Nutrition Directors • Center for Science in the Public Interest • Directors of Health Promotion and Education • National Association of Chronic Disease Directors • National Association for Sport and Physical Education • Society of State Directors of Health, Physical Education and Recreation • United Fresh Produce Association

  12. HARKIN SUPPORTERS (cont’d.) ORGANIZATIONS (cont’d.): • American Beverage Association • American Association of School Administrators • American Dietetic Association • American Federation of Teachers • American Medical Association • American Public Health Association

  13. HARKIN SUPPORTERS (cont’d.) ORGANIZATIONS (cont’d.): • Consumer Federation of America • Food Research and Action Center • International Dairy Food Association • National Association of School Nurses • National Milk Producers Federation • National Education Association • National PTA

  14. LAC GOALS • Explain why SNA did not support Chairman Harkin • Outline SNA Goals • LET’S DO IT RIGHT IN 2009

  15. CREDIBILITY • KEY TO LAC

More Related