1 / 5

2009 CPYP Conference

2009 CPYP Conference. Results from 2008 Evaluation and the Status of the Project in Current CPYP Counties. Craig Evans, CPYP Evaluator. Overview of 2008 Results. Tracked 12 youth in 10 counties (120 youth) for two years (January 2006 – December 2007).

xylia
Télécharger la présentation

2009 CPYP Conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2009 CPYP Conference Results from 2008 Evaluation and the Status of the Project in Current CPYP Counties Craig Evans, CPYP Evaluator

  2. Overview of 2008 Results • Tracked 12 youth in 10 counties (120 youth) for two years (January 2006 – December 2007). • Workers reported 91 of 120 youth (76%) had formed Permanent Connections. • Sibling connections reestablished or strengthened because of project for 56 youth (47%).

  3. Implementation Challenges • Staffing Decisions • Staff Turnover • Lack of Legal Permanence

  4. Project Status in Current Counties Permanency Teams: • 42% have created a Team and 20% have held the first Meeting Family Search & Engagement Activities: • 74% have spoken to youth re: FS & E • 60% have spoken to youth’s family re: FS & E • 56% have mined the case file Methods used to Support Relationships: • 49% have arranged for visits w/potential PC • 39% have educated PC about what to expect • 37% have provided G&L therapy to the youth

  5. Evaluation Going Forward Because of Short Time-Frame for Evaluation: • Less likely to achieve legal permanence • Greater focus on process steps • Track extent to which CPYP youth “step down” to lower level of care • Need consistency on “What it means to be a Permanent Connection”

More Related