1 / 26

Experience in mathematical optimization

Wells-Tool. Experience in mathematical optimization. Automatic shape optimisation. parameterized geometry. Directe optimisation “Response Surface” method Estimation of an continous approximate function by Neuronal net Polynomial approach Spline

yanka
Télécharger la présentation

Experience in mathematical optimization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Wells-Tool Experience in mathematical optimization Automatic shape optimisation parameterized geometry

  2. Directe optimisation “Response Surface” method Estimation of an continous approximate function by Neuronal net Polynomial approach Spline Search for the optimum of the approximate function Optimisation Methods

  3. Response Surface Methode berechnete Werte Qualitätsfunktion Parameter Optimierung an der Response Surface

  4. 3 relaxation 1 cost function 2 assumed optimum search direction EXTREME • Gradient type algorithmus, with search direction • Opjective funktion is locally approximated and the minimum is calculated along the search direction

  5. Start with a randomly chosen population New population is obtained by Mutation Crossover Survival of the fittest Live time of each individual is exactly 1 generation (Comma Strategie) Evolution methode Self Adaptive Evolution (SAE)

  6. Research: Asynchronous, parallel optimisation Parallel Optimisation simultaneous simulation on different resources each simulation is run in parallel

  7. Parallel Optimisation Grid Compting

  8. CFD randomly choseninitial parameter sets CFD CFD CFD CFD CFD grid portal CFD CFD CFD Applied Algorithm survival of the fittest new sets by discrete operation, e. g. mirror new sets randomlywith weighting

  9. Example Guide vane shape

  10. Geometry Parameterisation Guide vane geometry Inlet angle, Outlet angle, chamber line angle, Weighting factor inlet, Weighting factor outlet, Overlapping,Profile a, Profile b, Trailing edge thickness

  11. Automatic Grid Generation Automatic block structured mesh

  12. Simulation Results: Flow patterns (e. g pressure distribution) Overall quantities (e. g. efficiency, losses) Restrictions (e. g. cavitation) Typical computational time for one geometry: 1-4 hon a Cluster of HPC

  13. Guide vane shape optimized with evolution strategy 9 free parameters: -45 different designs (individuals) per generation -8 generations -in total 360 calculations

  14. Convergence

  15. Optimised Geometrie

  16. Test example: Draft tube cone Din L Dout Assumption:Cone length Optimisation: Outlet diameter

  17. Test example: Draft tube cone Cone length: 6 D_in 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 Draft tube efficiency 0.6 randomly chosen starting points 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 D_out/D_in

  18. Test example: Draft tube cone 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 Draft tube efficiency 0.6 survivors of the first generation 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 D_out/D_in

  19. Test example: Draft tube cone 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 Draft tube efficiency 0.6 survivors of the second generation 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 D_out/D_in

  20. Test example: Draft tube cone 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 Draft tube efficiency 0.6 survivors of the third generation 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 D_out/D_in

  21. Test example: Draft tube cone 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 Draft tube efficiency 0.6 survivors of the seventh generation computed points 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 D_out/D_in

  22. Draft tube area distribution Application: Refurbishment of an existing power plant The draft tube contour can only be changed slightly. Optimization of the area distribution

  23. Area distribution represented by B-Spline curves Inlet and outlet kept constant other cross sections scaled up Draft tube area distribution area distribution

  24. Draft tube area distribution Investigated area distribution during the optimisation Design point

  25. Draft tube area distribution Obtained area distribution Design point minimum efficiency original draft tube maximum efficiency draft tube efficiency increase: 8%overall efficiency increase: 0.4%

  26. Draft tube area distribution minimum efficiency design point part load original draft tube Overload

More Related