1 / 15

Good Ponzi schemes and the price of debt

Good Ponzi schemes and the price of debt. Bernardo Guimarães CEP Annual Conference 2005. The story of Carlo Ponzi An unprofitable business, A creative borrowing strategy, borrowing from Peter to pay Paul, And a few months of glory. National debts

yanka
Télécharger la présentation

Good Ponzi schemes and the price of debt

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Good Ponzi schemes and the price of debt Bernardo Guimarães CEP Annual Conference 2005

  2. The story of Carlo Ponzi • An unprofitable business, • A creative borrowing strategy, • borrowing from Peter to pay Paul, • And a few months of glory.

  3. National debts • Average maturity of OECD countries’ debts: 4.5-6 years. • Size of debt: 60%, 80%, 100% of their GDP. • Debt maturing in 1 year or less: 10-20% of countries’ GDPs. • How can a country pay that? • Emerging markets: shorter maturities. • Brazil in 2000: maturity of 50% of internal debt < 1 year. • It did manage to roll over the whole amount… • Short run: borrowing from Peter to pay Paul.

  4. Purpose of this paper • Framework for studying debt roll-over. • Focus on the price of debt. • Related Literature • Coordination and the price of debt (Morris and Shin, 2004). • static model, expectations, coordination. • The deficit gamble (Bohn, 1995 and Ball et al, 1998). • sustainability of deficits (long run question).

  5. Some results • Heterogeneity among (timing of) lenders makes a big difference, • Role of reserves, • Expectations about debtor’s policy, • Effects of maturity.

  6. Benchmark model • The debtor: • Stochastic cash flow ( Dq ~ N(mq,sq) ). • Stock of cash: q --- also affected by interest payments. • May issue debt (D): • Goes bankrupt and defaults when there is not enough money. • Lenders are paid pro-rata if there is some money. • Objective: • Survive as long as it can.

  7. Benchmark model with synchronized lenders • The lenders: • Continuum of lenders (measure 1, they have limited money). • They all come at the same time and stay for exactly DT. Then, they leave the economy and another set of lenders come in. • Assumption: lenders perfectly coordinate.

  8. Benchmark model with synchronized lenders • Equilibrium: • Lenders get 0 expected return. • Debtor may choose to borrow: • from a small fraction of lenders. • only when q is not too bad. • Ponzi scheme may provide a little help to survive (if mq > 0). • little or no long run effects.

  9. Benchmark model with synchronized lenders

  10. Adding heterogeneity in the model • Lenders: • At every period (Dt, small), l.Dt lenders arrive. • Lenders’ time in the economy: geometric distribution: • (l.Dt).(l.Dt) stay for 1 period, • (l.Dt).(l.Dt).(1 – l.Dt) stay for 2 periods, • (l.Dt).(l.Dt).(1 – l.Dt)2 stay for 3 periods, • and so on. • One state variable (D) tells me all about maturity of debt (no memory, no need to keep track of history).

  11. Adding heterogeneity in the model • Results: • I can’t calculate the optimal borrowing scheme for the debtor… • … but numerical examples show a much larger impact in the odds of surviving. • Key reason: externality provided by former lenders (they are stuck in their position).

  12. Good Ponzi schemes

  13. The price of debt

  14. Maturity

  15. Forward looking behavior of the interest rate. • Results: • interest rate paid today may be lower if debtor is expected to borrow even with worse values of q in the future. • however, the optimal scheme may be not borrow in the case of so bad values of q. • short-run biased debtor may be willing to tie its hands, but that may not be optimal…

More Related