1 / 16

Project Goals & Rationale

Implementation and Evaluation of Telephone Assisted Interventions Mary Sormanti, Ph.D., MSW Columbia University School of Social Work. Project Goals & Rationale. Development & implementation of telephone support groups for people coping with eol issues Development of an evaluation model

yardan
Télécharger la présentation

Project Goals & Rationale

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Implementation and Evaluation of Telephone Assisted InterventionsMary Sormanti, Ph.D., MSWColumbia University School of Social Work

  2. Project Goals & Rationale • Development & implementation of telephone support groups for people coping with eol issues • Development of an evaluation model • Dissemination of outcomes & procedural issues • Student instruction about intervention development and evaluation

  3. Goal/Rationale Why Develop & implement telephone support groups for people coping with eol issues? • Accessibility • Affordability • Empirical evidence of positive psychosocial outcomes

  4. Goal/Rationale Why develop an evaluation model? • We want to know if what we do makes a difference • Forces us to be clear about our targets of intervention as well as the interventions themselves • Encourages a discussion of goals with our clients • Provides us with insight that might not be obtained otherwise • Enhances the link between research and practice (mutual) • Necessary component of an ethical accountable profession • Managed Care environment demands it

  5. Goal/Rationale Developing an evaluation model also will help to answer the following questions: • Are these types of groups feasible from agency & client perspectives? • Will agencies support their use? • Will people attend? • Will participants be satisfied? • Will the groups lead to hoped-for client changes? • Will participants have higher self-esteem? • Will participants experience better quality of life • Will participants be less depressed? • Will participants perceive change in qol?

  6. Goal/Rationale Why disseminate outcomes & procedural issues? • Add to existing practice knowledge • Others can learn from my mistakes! • Encourage innovation • Demonstrate that evaluation is doable

  7. Project Overview to Date • Relationship-Building with Agency – Cancer Care, New York City • Determination of Group to be Served • Intervention Development • Interviews with former telephone group participants • Interviews with agency staff • Development of group parameters • Development of Measurement Plan • Deciding upon relevant “targets” • Reviewing measurement literature • Choosing & locating appropriate measures • Compilation of Measurement Packet • Recruitment of Group Members • Review of agency records • Screening interviews • Facilitation of Group for Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer • Attainment of pre- & post-group data • Analysis of group process

  8. PROGRAM ELEMENTS GOALS OPERATIONALIZATION Identification Process ·Target individuals who are confronted with end- of-life issues • ·Advanced/metastatic illness • Willingness to talk about dying • · Intervention Process ·Provision of emotional support ·Facilitation of grief work ·Enabling open discussion of issues related to dying ·Encourage discussion of affect ·Maintain focus on difficult feelings ·Universalize & normalize experiences ·Facilitate communication with family and friends ·Problem-solve strategies for coping with losses and demands ·Explore spiritual needs Program Outcomes ·Enhanced adjustment to dying process ·Improved quality of life ·Decreased psych. distress ·Increased self-esteem · ·

  9. Challenges • Philosophical • Organizational/Procedural • Uncontrollable

  10. Philosophical Challenges • Defining “end of life” • Deciding how to advertise the group • Is it okay to ask dying people to participate in research?

  11. Organizational/Procedural Challenges • Good eol measures hard to find • Balancing “agendas” & priorities • university – community agency • Commitment & incentive

  12. Uncontrollable Challenges • Collaborator availability • Participants’ illnesses • Initial knowledge limitations

  13. Next Steps • Data Analysis for Group #1 • Content • Process • Outcomes • Implement Group #2 • Revisit student involvement • Dissemination

  14. What I’ve Learned Managing a project off-site is less than ideal…but doable if: • Everyone involved agrees to goals • Everyone involved understands their role • Everyone involved commits to their part in reaching those goals • Everyone involved benefits

  15. What I’ve Learned Practice research is time intensive…but limited time can be maximized by: • Establishing realistic goals at the start • Anticipating obstacles - and solutions • Insuring incentives for all involved

  16. References for Measures • Morasso, G., Costantini, M., Borreani, C., & Capelli, M. (1996). Assessing psychological distress in cancer patients. Validation of a self-administered questionnaire. Oncology, 53(4), 295-302. • Osobo, D., Rodrigues, G., Myles, J. et al. (1998). Interpreting the significance of health-related quality of life scores. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16, 139-144 • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. • http://www.facit.org

More Related