Implementing a Qualifications Framework

1. Implementing a Qualifications Framework Neum, 16-17 November 2007 Sarajevo, 8-9 February 2007 Eva Gonczi + Stephen Adam

2. BFUG Working Group on Qualifications Frameworks

4. Criteria for the verification that national frameworks are compatible with the EHEA Framework: • The national framework for higher education qualifications and the body or bodies responsible for its development are designated by the national ministry with responsibility for higher education • There is a clear and demonstrable link between the qualifications in the national framework and the cycle of qualification descriptors of the European Framework • The national framework and its qualifications are demonstrably based on learning outcomes and the qualifications are linked to ECTS or ECTS compatible credits • The procedures for inclusion of qualifications in the national framework are transparent

5. The national quality assurance systems for higher education refer to the national framework of qualifications and are consistent with the Berlin Communiqué and any subsequent communiqués agreed by ministers in the Bologna process • The national framework, and any alignment with the European Framework, is referenced in all Diploma Supplements • The responsibilities of the domestic parties to the national framework are clearly determined and published

6. e.g.Scotland

7. Consider the details of the implementation process in BiH • Any additional local stages required • Problems of implementation: institutional barriers, financial barriers, political barriers, etc. • Strategic issues • Staff development/training requirements – all levels • Linkages with the recognition and QA agendas • The full range of stakeholders to consult • Possible logistical problems and timescales • The need for a publicity/information campaign • Transitional arrangements • Areas where international support would be helpful • Anything else?

8. Implementation of the framework – Road map!(This section to be developed following further discussion + reference to guidelines (external reference points, quality assurance, recognition, etc). 0 Precondition – a national law? 1 Decision to start -Taken by the national body responsible for HE (minister?) 2 Setting the agenda: The purpose of our NQF - WG-Report nr. 1 (section 2.3) 3 Organising the process - identifying stakeholders; setting up a committee/WG 4 Design - Cycles, Level structure, Level descriptors (learning outcomes) Credit ranges + common understanding of credits + structures/years + levels 5 Consultation - National discussion and acceptance of design by stakeholders –who are? 6 Approval- According to national tradition by Minister/Government/legislation 7Administrative set-up - Division of tasks of implementation between HEI, QAA and other bodies 8 Implementation at institutional/programme level - Reformulation of individual study programmes to learning outcome based approach + review all existing qualifications 9 Inclusion of qualifications in the NQF - Accreditation or similar (cfr. Berlin Communiqué) 10 Self-certification of compatibility with the EHEA framework (Alignment to Bologna cycles etc.) - WG Report nr. 1. Pilot projects