1 / 29

The Journey to Reaffirmation “Systematic Based Evaluation”

The Journey to Reaffirmation “Systematic Based Evaluation”. Spring 2009 Faculty/Staff Conference Southern University at Shreveport January 12, 2009. Mr. Martin B. Fortner, Director, PAR Ms. Eva J. Harris, IE Coordinator, PAR

yon
Télécharger la présentation

The Journey to Reaffirmation “Systematic Based Evaluation”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Journey to Reaffirmation“Systematic Based Evaluation” Spring 2009 Faculty/Staff Conference Southern University at Shreveport January 12, 2009 Mr. Martin B. Fortner, Director, PAR Ms. Eva J. Harris, IE Coordinator, PAR Ms. Linda Evans, Adm. Assistant, PAR Planning, Assessment & Research ‘09

  2. Strategic Profile • By fiscal year 2012/13, SUSLA is projected to have an average annual enrollment approximating 2,500 students. • With the presence of student housing and enhanced student support services, SUSLA’s is projected to maintain a first time freshman retention rate of sixty-four (64) percent. • Ultimate improvements in student retention and academic persistence are expected to increase graduation completion rates. By 2012, SUSLA expects to maintain an annual average completion rate of twenty-four (24) percent. • Graduates must demonstrate competencies in Written and Oral Communications, Critical Analysis and Reasoning, Scientific and Quantitative Reasoning, Technological Competency, Leadership and Deportment. Planning, Assessment, & Research ‘09

  3. SACS Core Requirement 2.5“Systematic Based Evaluation” Vision 2020 Vibrant Balanced Economy With a Well-Educated Workforce and Improved Life Quality. Act 1465/ BOR Strategic Master Plan: Establish Annual Performance Targets In Support of Vision 2020, Emphasizing Student Access, Academic Quality & Matriculation Success. Southern University System:Establish Annual Performance Targets In Support of BOR Master Plan with Emphasis on Academic Excellence, Access,Achievement, Accountability & Assessment . SUSLA Institutional Strategic Plan: Establish Annual Performance Targets In Support of Act 1465, which Include Access & Success, and Collateral Strategic Initiatives Consistent With Institutional Mission . . Planning, Assessment & Research ‘09

  4. SACS Core Requirement 2.5“Systematic Based Evaluation” Divisional Strategic Plans: Establish Annual Performance Targets In Support of SUSLA’ s Strategic Initiatives, Consistent With University Mission, Intergovernmental Institutional Support Programs and Academic Program Accreditation Requirements . Institutional Effectiveness Plans: Seventy – Three Budgeted Reporting Units Required toEstablish Annual Performance Objectives In Support of SUSLA’ s Strategic Initiatives, Consistent With University Mission , Intergovernmental Institutional Support Programs and Academic Program Accreditation Requirements. (IE)Plans Must Include Evidence of Attainment Activities Related to Core Learning Competencies. Consistent With SACS Comprehensive Standards (3.3.1& 3.5.1) Planning, Assessment & Research ‘09

  5. SACS Core Requirement 2.5“Systematic Based Evaluation” Planning Budget Priorities Committee: Recommend Funding of Critical Operational Recommendations Originating form the Institutional Effectiveness Process. Operational Recommendations Critical to Attainment of SUSLA’ s Strategic Initiatives. Annual Report Card: Documented Evidence of Supporting SUSLA’S Concept of an Ongoing, Integrated, and Institutional–wide Research–Based Planning and Evaluation Processes that Incorporate a Systemic Review of Programs and Services that (a) Results in Continuing Improvement and (b) demonstrates that the SUSLA is Effectively Accomplishing its Mission. Planning, Assessment & Research ‘09

  6. Linking Strategic Initiatives to Institutional Effectiveness Baseline Year FY 2007/08 Goal I. Access and Success Establishment of an Student “Entry to Exit” Data Decision Continuum Which Assesses Effectiveness in the Areas of Enrollment, Retention, and Completion Rates. Goal II. Ensure Quality and Accountability Assessment of Institutional Processes Supporting Student Learning and Successful Academic Matriculation. Performance Documentation: Baseline Data Reports: Statewide Student Profile Reporting System Process Improvement: Institutional Effectiveness Plans & Reports Feedback Linkages:Annual Report Card on Strategic Initiatives Planning Priority Budget Committee Planning, Assessment, & Research ‘09

  7. "Opening the Loop" VISION Institutional Effective Plan Institutional Effective Report (9/15) (5/30) MISSION UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC PLAN "Closing the Loop" Planning & Priorities (Budget Planning) (April Meeting) DIVISIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN Annual I E (Report Card) (End of Year) December SUSLA Institutional Effectiveness Model Overarching Goals Institutional Initiatives Revised 7/01/07: IEM Consistent With State Fiscal Year Planning, Assessment & Research ‘09

  8. Goal I Student Access Annual Headcount Enrollment Projections on Target Planning, Assessment, & Research ‘09

  9. Enrollment Projections FY 2006/07 – 2011/12 BOR Statewide Student Profile Reporting System (SSPS)

  10. Goal II Quality & Accountability High Time to Degree Completion Rates (Associates 6.3 yrs., Certificate 4.3 yrs.) High Institutional Credit Hours at Graduation Planning, Assessment, & Research ‘09

  11. Methodology Time to Degree Analysis (TTD) - Analyzed Program Completers For The AY 2007/08 Graduation Class. - TTD Derived By Calculating Student Entry Date To Final Completion Date. - Presented Information By Academic Division and Respective Program Major. Institutional Credit Hours (CHs) At Graduation - Calculated Number of Institutional CH Attained At Time of Graduation. - Compared Hours With Program Degree and FAP/SAP Requirements. - Presented A “Snapshot” of Results Planning, Assessment, & Research ‘09

  12. Time to Degree by Academic Division (Associate Degree) Years BOR Statewide Student Profile Reporting System (SSPS)

  13. Division of BSEBS Time to Degree – Associate Level Years BOR Statewide Student Profile Reporting System (SSPS)

  14. Division of Liberal Arts & Science Technology Time to Degree Associate Level Years BOR Statewide Student Profile Reporting System (SSPS)

  15. Division of Allied Health Time to Degree – Associate Level Years BOR Statewide Student Profile Reporting System (SSPS)

  16. School of Nursing Time to Degree - Associate Level Years BOR Statewide Student Profile Reporting System (SSPS)

  17. Timeto Degree By Academic Division Certificate Level Years BOR Statewide Student Profile Reporting System (SSPS)

  18. Division of BSEBS Time to Degree - Certificate Level Years BOR Statewide Student Profile Reporting System (SSPS)

  19. Division of Liberal Arts & Science Technology Time to Degree - Certificate Level Years BOR Statewide Student Profile Reporting System (SSPS)

  20. Division of Allied Health Time to Degree – Certificate Level Years BOR Statewide Student Profile Reporting System (SSPS)

  21. Institutional Credit Hours at Graduation BOR Statewide Student Profile Reporting System (SSPS)

  22. Institutional Effective Planning & Reporting Linking Strategic Initiatives Planning, Assessment, & Research ‘09

  23. Evaluation of Instructional Program Planning, Assessment, and Improvement Evaluation of Non-Instructional Unit Planning, Assessment, and Improvement II. Assessment of Strategic Goals for 2007-2008 II. Assessment of Strategic Goals for 2007-2008 NOTE: Sections I, II, IV & V MUST be submitted in its entirety on September 15th of each year for ALL reporting Units.

  24. Evaluation of Instructional Program Planning, Assessment, and Improvement II. Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes for 2007-2008 NOTE: Sections I,II, IV & V MUST be submitted in its entirety on September 15th of each year for ALL reporting Units.

  25. Evaluation of Instructional Program Planning, Assessment, and Improvement Evaluation of Non-Instructional Unit Planning, Assessment, and Improvement III. Instructional Program Planning, 2008-2009 III.Non-Institutional Unit Planning, 2008-2009 This section must be submitted by May 30thof each year. Each non-instructional unit must set measurable goals and list action strategies that detail how each goal will be accomplished. In addition, non-instructional units must tell how the degree of attainment of the goal will be measured. This section must be submitted by May 30thof each year. Each instructional program must set measurable goals and list action strategies that detail how each goal will be accomplished. In addition, instructional programs must tell how the degree of attainment of the goal will be measured. NOTE: Sections I, II, IV & V MUST be submitted in its entirety on September 15th of each year for ALL reporting Units.

  26. Evaluation of Instructional Program Planning, Assessment, and Improvement III. Assessment of Goals and Outcomes for 2008-2009 NOTE: Sections I, II, IV & V MUST be submitted in its entirety on September 15th of each year for ALL reporting Units.

  27. Instructional Units “Performance Indicators” Outcomes Assessments and Strategic Planning Program Enrollment, Graduation, and Retention Rates Course Completion/Success Rates Program Admission Rates Frequency of Course Offerings E Learning Courses/Technology Learning Outcomes Advisor Certification Faculty Professional Development Planning, Assessment, & Research ‘09

  28. NonInstructional Units“Performance Indicators” Outcome Assessment & Strategic Planning Processes Supporting Institutional Goals I & II - Pre-Enrollment Trends - Inter - Divisional Coordination - Class Enrollment Trends - Financial Aid Eligibility - Class Withdrawal/Acquisition - Optimal Class Purging - Dual Enrollment Trends - Enrollment Management Policies/Procedures - Efficiency in Pre/Semester Registration Process - Recruitment & Tutorial Support Planning, Assessment, & Research ‘09

  29. Where Do We Go From Here ?“Maintaining A Vision” Communication Cooperation Mutual Respect Professionalism “A Willingness to Commit” Planning, Assessment, & Research ‘09

More Related