1 / 14

The Natural Sciences as AoK

The Natural Sciences as AoK. What is Natural Science?. “Science may be described as the art of systematic oversimplification.” --Karl Popper (1902-1994) “Science is a way of thinking more than it is a body of knowledge.” --Carl Sagan (1934-1996). The Scientific Method. Observartion

yori
Télécharger la présentation

The Natural Sciences as AoK

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Natural Sciences as AoK

  2. What is Natural Science? • “Science may be described as the art of systematic oversimplification.” --Karl Popper (1902-1994) • “Science is a way of thinking more than it is a body of knowledge.” --Carl Sagan (1934-1996)

  3. The Scientific Method • Observartion • Hypothesis • Experiment • Law • Theory

  4. The Scientific Method • Observe and record data • Classify relevant data • Search for a pattern in the data • Formulate a hypothesis • Make a predication based on steps 1-4 • Test prediction using an experiment • If experiment confirms hypothesis = discovery of a scientific law • Controllability: vary only 1 factor at a time to help isolate cause of phenomenon being investigated • Measurability: relevant variables must be measurable, which allows precisions & objectivity • Repeatability: others must be able to repeat experiment & confirm results • Develop a theory, which explains & unifies various laws based on an underlying principle: a good theory explains why laws are the way they are & provides focus for further research* * Lagemaat, Richard van de, Theory of Knowlesde: for the IB Diploma, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, p.226.

  5. The Scientific Method : An Example Observation: • Observation of the nighttime sky over the centuries became better, leading to a more complicated picture of heavenly bodies • Ptolemy’s geocentric model of the universe become less orderly and more messy, needing more & more new explanations to make sense of the model

  6. The Scientific Method : An Example Hypothesis • Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) proposes a heliocentric model of the universe with the sun at the center & the Earth revolving around the sun • Simpler & more elegant explanation

  7. The Scientific Method : An Example Prediction • In Ptolemaic model, Venus always same size • In Copernican model, Venus’ size should vary depending on its distance from the Earth • 1609: Galileo (1564-1642) uses his telescope to observe that Venus’ size does vary depending on its relative position from Earth just as Copernicus had predicted

  8. The Scientific Method : An Example Law • Johann Kepler (1571-1630) used the above observations & discoveries in his study of the heavenly bodies • Kepler developed his laws of planetary motion, which included his assertion than planets revolve around the Sun in ellipses

  9. The Scientific Method : An Example Theory • Isaac Newton (1642-1727) devised the theory of gravity • Theory of Gravity: there is a force of attraction between objects, directly proportional to their masses & inversely proportional to the square of the distance between objects (2x distance: ¼ gravitational attraction) • Broader theory of gravity explained why apples fall (probably apocryphal story), people have weight, movement of the tides & led to discovery of Uranus (1781) & Neptune (1846)

  10. The Scientific Method : Consider • Scientific progress needs a background of careful observation (Kepler need Tycho Brahe, 1546-1601) • Technology can strengthen powers of observation (telescope & microscope) • Imagination has an important role in scientific discoveries (Copernicus saw what so many others had not seen*) • Mathematics plays a key function; it gives expression & precision (Newton’s laws) *Aristarchus (3rd century BCE Greek astronomer proposed a heliocentric universe)

  11. The Scientific Method : Problems Observation • Relevance: humans always begin with an idea(s) of what is or is not relevant to a problem • Selective nature of perception: possible to overlook or not anticipate something that turns out to be relevant (# people in a room during an experiment) • Expectations can influence observations • Expert seeing: practice & experience to look in microscope or read an ultrasound • Observer effect: an of observation can affect what is observed (thermometer)

  12. The Scientific Method : Problems Hypothesis • Confirmation bias: accept evidence that confirms biases & reject evidence that does not • Charles Darwin (1809-1882): “’I followed a golden rule, namely that whenever a new observation or thought came across me, which was opposed to my general results, I make a memorandum of it without fail at once; for I had found by experience that such facts and thoughts were far more apt to escape from the memory than favorable ones.” (Lagermaat, p. 230)

  13. The Scientific Method : Problems Hypothesis • Background assumptions: humans make assumptions that may prove to be incorrect (notion that stars were close to the Earth) • Different hypotheses can be consistent with a set of data • Principle of Simplicity: in the presence of two or more competing theories that make the same predictions… the simpler theory is to be preferred

  14. The Scientific Method : Problems Law • Problem of Induction: move from observed to unobserved (all swans are white or all metals expand when heated) • Practical Problems: how many observations are needed? • Theoretical Problems: • science is based on empricism (no claims beyond the observed) • grounding in observation gives authority to science not found in pseudo-science • do we refuse to make claims that go beyond what has been observed? • how do new laws & discoveries get made • allow right of scientists to reason from particular to general • abandon claim that science is strictly emprical?

More Related