1 / 39

Developing SMART statements of commitments

Developing SMART statements of commitments . 2014 HLM Preparatory Webinar series Webinar 5 – 20 February 2013 . Agenda s Decision-making for WASH . Introductions and house rules (translation/ chat/questions) Preparation checklist Developing SMART HLM Commitments: Outputs

zalman
Télécharger la présentation

Developing SMART statements of commitments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Developing SMART statements of commitments 2014 HLM Preparatory Webinar series Webinar 5 – 20 February 2013

  2. Agendas Decision-making for WASH • Introductions and house rules (translation/ chat/questions) • Preparation checklist • Developing SMART HLM Commitments: Outputs • Developing SMART HLM Commitments: ‘ Golden Rules’ • Developing SMART HLM Commitments: Process • Q & A

  3. Prep checklist

  4. Preparatory tracks to the HLM UNIVERSAL ACCESS ELIMINATING INEQUALITY IMPROVING SUSTAINABILITY Donors dialogue Commitments Advocacy/ engagement HLM Sum-mary slide Statement of Commit-ments SMM Dev. Countries dialogue 10 Apr. 2014 11 Apr. 2014 SWA partners/donors in country

  5. Prep Checklist – So far 2nd/3rd timers 1st timers Observers Dec Dec Dec - Jan 1. Meet Ministers of Finance Jan Jan 2. Agree plan with stakeholders 9 Feb 70% of countries already responded 3. Send status of 2012 Commitments Feb Feb 4. Review priorities bottlenecks Mar Mar 5. Draft 2014 Commitments Technical Sector dialogue

  6. Prep Checklist – Next steps 2nd/3rd timers 1st timers Observers 5 Mar 5 Mar 6. Send 2014 Commitments for review (optional) 4 countries already sent 7 Mar 7 Mar 7 Mar 7. Send RSVP 28 Mar 28 Mar 8. Final Validation of statements 31 Mar 31 Mar 9. Send slides 1 Apr Technical Sector dialogue 1 Apr 1 Apr 10. Final briefing of Ministers

  7. 1 slide for the HLM SUMMARY of commitments By 10 Apr. 2014 Focus on Developing Commitments 4 slides for the SMM By 5 Mar. 2014 COUNTRY STATEMENT of commitments Articulation of commitments Advocacy/ engagement Prep DIALOGUE Analytical TOOLS Technical Sector dialogue

  8. Outputs of the HLCD (inputs to the HLM/SMM)

  9. Output 1: Statement of commitments Structure (2 pages max): • Key Sector Indicators • Long term vision and focus for 2014-2016 • Key bottlenecks identified • Summary of progress on 2012 HLM Commitments • Key 4-6 SMART commitments • Validation

  10. Output 2: Four slides Slide 4 is to be presented at the HLM

  11. Slide 1: The vision • Today’s situation: Key Sector Indicators • Coverage and disparities • Focus for 2014-2016 • Indicate focus achievements between 2014-2016 • Long term vision • Indicate a roadmap towards universal access • Indicate how the roadmap will address elimination of inequalities and improvement of sustainability

  12. Slide 2: The challenges 4. Key bottlenecks • Identify the key barriers and bottlenecks that you aim at tackling 5. Process of identification • Describe the process, the actors and the sources involved

  13. Slide 3: The progress on 2012 commitments 6. Key achievement areas • Indicate in which category of commitments you made most progressed 7. Areas of incomplete progress • Indicate which type of commitments represented most challenges and why 8. Carry-over to 2014 • Indicate which commitments will be carried over, but with a different angle, to 2014

  14. Slide 4: 2014 Commitments 9. Commitments contributing to Sustainability • 2-3 SMART commitments 10. Contributing to Eliminating Inequalities • 2-3 SMART commitments Will be presented at the HLM too

  15. ‘Golden rules’ for SMART commitments

  16. Framework: 1 bold vision 11 areas of action 1 Bold vision UNIVERSAL ACCESS ELIMINATING INEQUALITY IMPROVING SUSTAINABILITY 11 Key areas of action Political Prioritization Evidence Based Dec-Making National Processes Financing Visibility Global Monitoring National monitoring systems Transparency Evidence Linking monitoring to planning 8. Policy & Plans 9. Coordination and aligment 10. Decentralization 11. Capacity (including HR)

  17. Learning from 2012 HLM commitments: a melting pot?

  18. Learning from 2012 HLM commitments: a melting pot? • Screen-shot on commitments from website; both circles and the histogram Political Prioritization Evidence Based Decisions National Processes

  19. Creative tensions of 2012 HLM commitments • Too Many vs. Too Few • Old vs. New • Quick wins vs. Structural Changes • Broad vs. Specific

  20. The rules of dream 2014 HLM commitments 2014 HLM 2012 HLM • Few, but of quality • Rooted in plans, but with a new lens • Sequence short-term and structural • SWA –MART: Smart and SWA categories • Too few vs. too little • Old vs. New • Short-term vs. structural • Broad vs. Specific

  21. 1. Few, but of quality • ‘90 second’ rule • Max. 5 commitments • Commitments tell a story to the high level • ‘game-changing’ rule • Bold commitments that will carry a step-change on: • Sustainability • Elimination of inequalities • Universal access

  22. 2. Rooted in plans, but with new lens Balance Rule • Good commitments are • - rooted in existing plans • - Understand bottlenecksof unfinished agenda BUT • - Recognise shifting agenda • (Universal access, tackling inequalities, sutainabiliy, aid-effectiveness) • - will be integratedin next planning cycle

  23. 3. Sequence short vs. long term • ‘Approppriate timeframe’ rule • Quick wins for ‘1st timers / 2 yr. periods • For 2nd timers, focus should shift to structural changes

  24. 4. Make them SWA-MART ‘SMART rule’ Ensure coordination of sector activities • Specific • Measurable • Achievable • Relevant • Timebound NO ? ? ? NO

  25. 4. SWA- MART Establish over the next two years a fully formal coordination mechanism for partners jointly provided by Ministry of Health and Ministry of Public Works SMART • Specific • Measurable • Achievable • Relevant • Timebound YES ? YES ? YES

  26. 4. SWA- MART Inclusion of sanitation in the political agenda SMART • Specific • Measurable • Achievable • Relevant • Timebound NO ? ? ? NO

  27. 4. SWA- MART SMART Include Sanitation as priority in the Growth Strategy for Poverty Reduction Document (2014-2018) and Government Priority Actions Program (2014-2018) • Specific • Measurable • Achievable • Relevant • Timebound Yes Yes ? ? Yes

  28. 4. SWA- MART SMART Include Sanitation as priority in the Growth Strategy for Poverty Reduction Document (2014-2018) and Government Priority Actions Program (2014-2018) • Specific • Measurable • Achievable • Relevant • Timebound Yes Yes ? ? Yes

  29. 4a. SWA Specific • Indicate an action, lead ans supporting ministers/parners • Makes sense at country level • BUT fits into SWA CATERGORIES Political Prioritization Evidence Based Dec-Making National Processes Financing Visibility Global Monitoring National monitoring systems Transparency Evidence Linking monitoring to planning 8. Policy & Plans 9. Coordination and aligment 10. Decentralization 11. Capacity

  30. 4b. SWA Measurable • No global/ common indicators • BUT country-specific indicator included upfront • Check for measurability by national systems

  31. 4c. Achievable • ACHIEVABLE: • Consistent with progress on previous commitments • Consistent with what other countries do • Anticipating all facets/ level off effort required • E.g.: Build knowledge-sharing networks • 1yr later: centres have been built but no meny to run them!

  32. 4d. Relevant • Fit to fix the main problems! • Comitments reflect: • Key sector bottlenecks– JSRs, CSOs, BAT, JSR, GLAAS • Progress of previous commitments- SWA update • Country broader priorities - PSRP etc. • Commitments in regional/global fora - AfricaSan, SACOSAN

  33. 4d. Timebound • Timebound: • What can be achieved before 2016? • If the comitment is longer term, then it should be broken down into milestones, one of which should be achievable by 2016

  34. What happens to 2012HLM commitments in 2014? 1. Has the 2012 HLM commitment been achieved? Yes Par-tially 2. Is the commitment still relevant to the current context ? No Yes Archive commitment Analyze barriers and refocus/rephrase

  35. Process and tools

  36. The process of developing HLM commitments PREP DIALOGUE o9p0 6. Getting stakeholderstogether 7. Analyzing bottlenecks and previous progress 8. Balancing old and new priorities 9. Aligning with regional processes 10. Linking Post-2015 country consultations

  37. Support from the secretariat

  38. SWA Website: Global comparisons • Guidance notes • Sample statement of commitments • SWA website- progress of commitments • GLAAS profiles • Econ Cases • Review of draft statement of commitments • Template for slides

  39. SWA Website: Global comparisons

More Related