1 / 13

Peter Askman, Region Skåne Henrik Nilsson, WMU Palanga, 2 -3 December, 2013

P an-Baltic stakeholder workshop on “Maritime Spatial Planning - Shipping and Ports in the Baltic Sea” Brussels, 24 October 2013. Peter Askman, Region Skåne Henrik Nilsson, WMU Palanga, 2 -3 December, 2013. Workshop on Shipping & Ports. Participants b y country and sector.

zanta
Télécharger la présentation

Peter Askman, Region Skåne Henrik Nilsson, WMU Palanga, 2 -3 December, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pan-Baltic stakeholder workshop on“Maritime Spatial Planning - Shipping and Ports in the Baltic Sea”Brussels, 24 October 2013 Peter Askman, Region Skåne Henrik Nilsson, WMU Palanga, 2-3 December, 2013

  2. Workshop on Shipping & Ports Participants by country and sector

  3. Main topics Integration of Shipping and Port sectors in MSP Existing Baltic Sea platforms for MSP Communication and division of responsibility

  4. Workshop on Shipping and Ports (1) • Port industry - Key findings: • Limited dialogue on MSP implications for ports on a pan-Baltic level; Low interest; No platform, communication gaps between different levels. • Enormous pressure from city developers: Growing cities versus expanding ports - Cities are taking over port areas. • Ports moving from the city centers, into coastal sea areas, closer to the shipping lanes; • Concentration to fewer, higly developed ports; • Container ships larger deeper and wider lanes; • New future navigation structures and corridorsrequired. • Consideration to be taken with new pipelines & cables

  5. Workshop on Shipping and PortsKey findings Ports (2) • MSP planners should establish a continuing dialogue with the transport market players (the driver) to learn about future developments and needs of ports/shipping; • MSP planners should focus on the container sector – the bulk market always finds their “own ways”, independent of shipping corridors; • Long licensing procedures for port development  ports must become involved in MSP at a very early stage. • Ports are individual players - they lack a unified voice. • Ports act on the local, regional, national and international arena: The communication level depend on the issue; • A need for port organizations to get early input from MSP.

  6. Workshop on Shipping and PortsKey findings – Shipping (1) • Shifts in trade - huge impacts on shipping patterns - can be predicted; • MSP should take account to increased demand for seaborne transports; • Increase expected in general cargo, but most of all container; • The B Sea can expect larger container carriers with specific needs considering navigation, routes and MSP; • Successful example of changing ship traffic lanes: Norway; • Early “flexible” drafts of plans to get sectors on the arena; • Few resources to participate continuously in the planning process;

  7. Workshop on Shipping and PortsKey findings – Shipping (2) • Smart MSP may have positive effects on shipping economy, maritime safety; • Benefits of coordinating shipping routes and other uses in the same “office”; • Enhanced communication & early discussions with shipping authorities is essential • Shipping sector is scattered in terms of stakeholders and lacks information on MSP. • The focus should also be on the cargo owner (transport buyer) • Use existing platforms for MSP interactions with the shipping sector: IMO, IALA, IHO, ICS • Create tools for transnational and bilateral communication on maritime spatial plans.

  8. Pan-Baltic stakeholder workshop onClimate Change Adaptations and Maritime Spatial Planning in the Baltic SeaSkanör, 13-14 May 2013 Peter Askman, Region Skåne Henrik Nilsson, WMU Palanga, 2-3 December, 2013

  9. Workshop on Climate Change Participants by sectors and countries

  10. Main topics Implications of climate change on marine ecosystem and maritime activities Adaptation of MSP to Climate change. Pan-Baltic strategy to climate change

  11. Workshop on Climate Change (1) • Key findings: Need of • Strategic approach, • Awareness rising in the field of CCA and MSP/ICZP, • Communication and information strategies, • Easily interpreted information/Visualisation of data • Structure for dialogue and support • Common “language” between researchers and planners. • “what is in it for me”-perspective for the key drivers & key implementers!

  12. Workshop on Climate Change (2) • Key findings: Need of • Pan-Baltic cooperation - on different levels • Adaptive and flexible planning process(uncertainty of climate change prognoses and other changes). • Plan for the unexpected. • Multiplayer perspective • Multifunctional perspective • Cases & experiences • Coordination and guidelines at European level

  13. Workshops on Shipping and Ports & Climate change • Some lessons learned: • Careful selection of speakers needed to ensure appropriate contribution to the workshop agenda • Keep presentations short – focus on question, answers, discussions • Prepare key questions for discussion • Establish contacts, especially with the industry for continuous dialogue

More Related