1 / 21

Outline for a ONS micro-data access and release strategy

Outline for a ONS micro-data access and release strategy. Richard Laux, Paul J Jackson NSID. New strategy. Advice is requested : On scope and coverage of the strategy On how and when any strategy should be communicated On what timescale any strategy should be implemented

zarifa
Télécharger la présentation

Outline for a ONS micro-data access and release strategy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Outline for a ONS micro-data access and release strategy Richard Laux, Paul J Jackson NSID

  2. New strategy Advice is requested : • On scope and coverage of the strategy • On how and when any strategy should be communicated • On what timescale any strategy should be implemented • On the preferred change process

  3. Where we are - Policy An ONS Micro-data Policy is in preparation : • Draft agreed by SPC in July • Defines, and makes distinct, micro-data ‘release’ and micro-data ‘access’ • Provides a matrix relating access method to User, purpose, and disclosiveness of data. • From which can be derived the best access solution: • Licensed use via an archive • Off site - access agreements • Off site - remote access • On site - laboratory / secondment

  4. Where we are - Regulation Micro-data Release Panel. • In place to regulate all release and all access to ONS micro-data. • Proved concept • Offer completeness of audit • Checks for Code and Protocol compliance in all cases • Has accumulated an ONS-wide knowledge of customer demand, user needs, data availability, and quality of service.

  5. Where we are - Licensed use Current practice : • Social survey data are deposited at UKDA as a matter of course. • Census SARs deposited at CCSR • Suitable for low-risk / low utility micro-data only. • Minimal set-up cost • Low maintenance • The full potential of the UKDA is not realised.

  6. Where we are - Off site Current practice : • Intra-GSS access under SLAs • Other researchers and LAs • Ad-hoc arrangements (approx 50 per annum) for non-GSS research institutions. • Suitable for medium-risk / medium-utility microdata. • High maintenance. • Confidential data leaves ONS - requires meaningful control, and compromises what we can pledge • Not consistent across ONS

  7. Where we are - remote access Current practice : • Welsh Assembly access to IDBR • NOMIS • (Future) NeSS and Census commissioned outputs • Suitable for analysing high-risk / high-utility microdata. • High set-up cost • Low maintenance (if crude rules are applied to outputs). • Confidential data does not leave direct ONS control • not popular with expert research users • in silos

  8. Where we are - laboratory Current practice : • BDL • CRAB • LS • Suitable for high-risk / high-utility micro-data. • No confidential data leaves ONS • High set-up and high maintenance (mostly in screening applicants and disclosure checking outputs) • Inconvenient for many users unless there are labs distributed around the country • In silos, and not consistent in ONS

  9. Where we are - International Current practice : • Dennis Trewin paper sets out a framework for micro-data access • ONS not at the forefront • But does have the expertise either in prototypes or in silos.

  10. Strategy is needed - User demand Evidence based policy making requires : • Bespoke statistics to meet very specific policy needs, • Small area statistics for devolved decision making, • Longitudinal statistics to monitor policy delivery, • Interdisciplinary statistics to describe inter-agency initiatives, • Validation by the academic research community, • High quality data, improved by feedback from expert users.

  11. Strategy is needed - more demand Vast increase in the number of agencies performing this work : E.g. - North East Regional Information Partnership consists of around 50 agencies working for North East public service authorities - all of which have stated a need for access to unperturbed, high-utility, multi-source micro-data. And claim to be able to use it.

  12. Strategy 1. Present micro-data access as a single corporate service. • A single route for all users, via the website, directing them to the optimum solution for their stated needs and their status.

  13. Strategy 2. Provide a spectrum of solutions based on a transparent matrix of User type, purpose, and disclosiveness of data. • Enhanced use of the UK Data Archive. • Intra-GSS off-site access under agreements • A corporate remote-access facility • A corporate on-site laboratory • A number of franchised laboratories across UK

  14. Strategy 3. Make micro-data access a horizontal specialism. • Regulation is already horizontal (MRP) • SDC standards same across the service. • A single ‘micro-data access team ’ drawn from existing services across the Office • Delivers user screening, advice, training, output checking - on behalf of the Office. • Single point of contact and relationship with Users

  15. Strategy 4. Build remote access lab and on-site data lab into the design for CORD and CORM • A window into CORD: no silos of micro-data • A common language for analysing data 5. Seek funding support from the wider research community

  16. Enhanced UKDA • Recommend : • Sources to require that all micro-data that can lawfully be deposited at UKDA should be placed there, • in a form suitable for management on our behalf and/or on our instruction, • its use regulated by MRP or a Sources Policy body.

  17. Intra GSS • Recommend : • Ensure all GSS members use an SLA relating to data supply. • Ensure the SLA is annexed by a data access agreement • Ensure all pledges allow for our data to flow within the GSS.

  18. Remote Access • Recommend : • Support the BDL Expression of Interest as a corporate facility for remote access to high-utility micro-data • Build in Tau-Argus • Develop standardise and practicable SDC criteria for outputs.

  19. Laboratories • Recommend : • Make BDL/CRAB a corporate facility within the modernised ONS • Sources to place all relevant micro-data within the facility on request • Tau-Argus plus SDC standard criteria • (ESRC grant?)

  20. Benefits • Many users, especially in the Regions, are users of statistics in general, not particular sources of statistics. A single point of contact will lead them to the best sources. • Many users don’t want the responsibility of having micro-data in their possession - remote facilities and laboratories will be welcomed. • Better use of UKDA is very efficient for ONS • Corporate solutions are better for ONS, and better for users too. • Corporate solutions are more likely to get financial support from the User community • Corporate solutions can react in a rapid and consistent way to legal and policy changes.

  21. Advice • On scope and coverage of the strategy • On how and when any strategy should be communicated • On what timescale any strategy should be implemented • On the preferred change process

More Related