1 / 16

reno-specific muon spectrum

reno-specific muon spectrum. GLG4Scint.cc  scintillation process  reemission process  energy deposition G4Cerenkov.cc  cerenkov process. optical photons tracking. GLG4PMTOpticalModel.cc : optical photon interaction with PMT. scint/off scint/reemission 0

zarola
Télécharger la présentation

reno-specific muon spectrum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. reno-specific muon spectrum

  2. GLG4Scint.cc  scintillation process  reemission process  energy deposition G4Cerenkov.cc  cerenkov process optical photons tracking GLG4PMTOpticalModel.cc : optical photon interaction with PMT scint/off scint/reemission 0 process/activate Cerenkov optical photon is disabled(turn off optical photon tracking), but still we have 'scintEdep'

  3. scintillation photon is ~ten times more than cerenkov photon • it takes ~3 sec for tracking of 10000 photons • how to count: • particle name==opticalphoton • process name==”Cerenkov”, “Scintillation”, “Reemission” • IBD event • positron is annihilated in ~10 mm • neutron is captured in ~100 mm • average path length of gammas is ~1000 mm

  4. IBD event at center (0,0,0) neutron (0,0,0) positron (0,0,0) optical photon generated annihilation: gamma (9.99, 12.7, 6.58) captured on Gd: gamma (-38.3, -225, 37.2) track length of gamma is ~ 1000 mm , which has about 16 steps occurring compton scattering e- e- • e- : tracking length 0.xx ~ xx.xx ex) tracking length 3.48 mm, 11.1 mm  optical photons are generated

  5. cerenkov only: ~1 event/3min. (~2000 n_photon_hits)

  6. <<< Event Catagory >>> topBotEvt topSideEvt sideBotEvt sideSideEvt totalEvt air: 18 veto only: 56 400 182 185 823 buffer only: 9 182 103 89 383 (catcher+target) : 49 156 135 136 476 all area: 1700 <<< Tagging efficiency >>> Air Veto only Buffer only Catcher+Target generated: 18 823 383 476 reconstructed: 0 781 380 473 tagging eff.: 0 94.9% 99.2% 99.4% (using OD) generated: 18 823 383 476 reconstructed: 0 0 287 476 tagging eff.: 0 0 74.9% 100% (using ID)

  7. Using OD pmts

  8. Check untagged events • Air only: 16 events (photonHit==0), 2 events (noHitPMT==0) • Target only (3 events) • 1 clst events(3) : • sideSide: #214, #707, #1633(through going buffer)  veto stopping muon events  it’s ok! • Buffer only (3 events) • 1 clst events(1) : • topSide: #213  veto stopping muon event  it’s ok! • 0 clst events(2) : • noHitPMT==0 : #554, #1195  veto stopping muon events  need to be checked!! • Veto only (42 events) • 1 clst events(29) : • topSide: 27 events  #897, #1500 veto stopping muon  25 events need to be checked!! • sideSide: #562, #1556  veto stopping muon  it’s ok! • 0 clst events(13) : • noHitPMT==0: #155  need to be checked!! • noHitPMT==0: 12 events  veto stopping muon  need to be checked!!

  9. What do untagged events look like? • (1) noHitPMT==0: • through going muon: air only(#1605, #1664), veto only(#155) • stopping muon: • buffer only: #554, #1195 • veto only: #29, #63, #290, #422, #495, #647, #986, #1056, • #1108, #1407, #1540, #1695 • (2) through going muon events reconstructed to one cluster event • 25 events: all topSide events

  10. (1)의 경우 #1605 #155

  11. (2)의 경우 #40 #1690

  12. through going muon momentum [MeV] Veto stopping muon momentum [MeV]

  13. Tagging efficiency (using OD pmts) • using through going muon events only Air Veto only Buffer only Catcher+Target generated: 18 786 368 459 reconstructed: 0 760 368 459 tagging eff.: 0 96.7% 100.0% 100.0% • 26(veto only) through going muon events are reconstructed to 1 cluster events : #155 + (2) • using all muon events (including veto stopping muon events) Air Veto only Buffer only Catcher+Target generated: 18 823 (37) 383 (15) 476 (17) reconstructed: 0 781 (21) 380 (12) 473 (14) tagging eff.: 0 94.9% 99.2% 99.4% •  Generated: stopping muon 37 + 15 + 17 = 69 events • Reconstructed: 21 of 37 stopping muons are reconstructed to 2 cluster events (veto only) • 12 of 15 stopping muons are reconstructed to 2 cluster events (buffer only) • 14 of 17 stopping muons are reconstructed to 2 cluster events (target only)

  14. Summary • Target only: • 459 (through going muon)  459 (2 cluster) • 17 (stopping muon)  14 (2 cluster), 3(1 cluster) • Buffer only: • 368 (through going muon)  368 ( 2 cluster) • 15 (stopping muon)  12 (2 cluster), 1 (1 cluster), 2 (no cluster (noHitPMT=0)) • Veto only: • 786 (through going muon)  760 (2 cluster), 25 (1 cluster), 1 (no cluster (noHitPMT=0)) • 37 (stopping muon)  21 (2 cluster), 4 (1 cluster), 12 (no cluster (noHitPMT=0))

  15. What is need to be checked • Need to check cut condition for ‘noHitPMT’: through going 이나 stopping muon을 스킵하는 경우가 있음 (15 events). • Stopping muon을 제대로 골라내지 못하는 경우: stopping muon을 2 cluster event로 reconstruct하는 경우가 있음 (47 events).  위의 두 사항이 해결되면 (target + catcher + buffer)를 지나는 모든 이벤트를 태깅할 수 있다. • 모서리를 치고 지나가는 뮤온: through going muon을 1 cluster event로 reconstruct하는 경우가 있음 (25 events). • 모서리치고 지나가는 뮤온으로부터 나온 neutron이 얼마나 되는지…

  16. to-do list • muon tagging efficiency using reno-specific muon spectrum: • through-going muon • stopping muon • inefficiency • muon induced backgrounds: • through going muon rate, stopping muon rate • neutron rate in the active detector region due to through going muon (or stopping muon) • total neutron rate in the target and correlated background rate, ..

More Related