1 / 25

2011 Skid Row Disaster Plan Survey Results

2011 Skid Row Disaster Plan Survey Results. Prepared and Presented By: St. Vincent ’ s Cardinal Manning Center. Participation in Survey. 16 local social service agencies completed the survey 4 of these 16 agencies are non-residential The participating agencies included:

zavad
Télécharger la présentation

2011 Skid Row Disaster Plan Survey Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2011 Skid Row Disaster Plan Survey Results Prepared and Presented By: St. Vincent’s Cardinal Manning Center

  2. Participation in Survey • 16 local social service agencies completed the survey • 4 of these 16 agencies are non-residential The participating agencies included: • LA Mission - Volunteers of America • JWCH - Skid Row Housing Trust • Los Angeles - LACAN Christian Health Center - Downtown Women’s Center • Chrysalis - LAMP Community • Midnight Mission - Emmanuel Baptist Rescue Mission • Weingart Center Association - SRO Housing • Union Rescue Mission - St. Vincent’s Cardinal Manning Center • Skid Row Development Corp.

  3. Disaster Plan Analysis:Emergency Preparedness QuestionsElements of written disaster plan Methods used to conduct survey: Telephone Email Fax In-person

  4. Emergency Preparedness:Factors measured • Minimum of three day supply of food and water for staff and clients. • Back up generator • Disaster kits for staff and clients • System to notify government or first responders (outside of 911) • Written disaster plan

  5. Emergency Preparedness: Factors measured cont’d • Disaster preparedness training for staff • Disaster drills • Disaster-related MOU’s or MOA’s with other agencies • Member of ENLA (Emergency Network of Los Angeles.

  6. Disaster Plan: Factors measured • Hazard/Threat assessment • Evacuation procedures • Fire (or explosion) prevention/control • Earthquake response • Biological outbreak response • Location of disaster supplies • Chain of command structures • Continuity of operations and management plans

  7. Disaster Plan: Factors measured cont’d • Staff/volunteer notification procedures • Steps to activating a disaster plan • How to shut off or restore utilities • Alternate work site locations • Steps on maintaining/restoring critical operations • Security plan • Emergency contact numbers • Critical records back up plan

  8. The Survey….

  9. Trends in Emergency Preparedness

  10. Trends: Emergency Preparedness • Over 62% (10) of agencies surveyed have a minimum of three day supply of food and water for staff compared to 56% (9) with supplies for clients. • Only 37% (6) have back up generators, all of which have sufficient fuel and are test run regularly.

  11. Trends: Emergency Preparednesscont’d • 44% (7) of the agencies have disaster kits for staff, while 13% (2) have kits for clients. A possible explanation for this could be the transient nature of clients and that only a small percentage are actually in permanent housing.

  12. Trends: Emergency Preparednesscont’d • Only 13% of the agencies surveyed have MOU’s or MOA’s with other agencies and are members of ENLA (Emergency Network of Los Angeles)

  13. Trends: Emergency Preparednesscont’d • 75% (12) agencies have a written disaster plan. Of this number, 100% review/update their plans annually while 92% distribute the plan to staff and conduct regular training (excellent!) • Of the 12 agencies that do conduct disaster drills, 2 conduct them annually, 5 bi-annually, 2 quarterly, 1 monthly, and 2 did not specify how frequently.

  14. Trends in Written Disaster Plans

  15. Trends: Disaster Plans The trends below are based on the twelve agencies with a written disaster plan. • Survey showed that majority of the surveyed agencies have disaster plans that meet the criteria.

  16. Trends: Disaster Plans cont’d • The main areas that are lacking in the written disaster plans include: • Biological outbreak response (83%) • Alternate site location (83%) • Security plan (75%) • Continuity of operations (83%)

  17. Conclusions/Recommendations The survey findings support the Skid Row Disaster Plan initiative to: • Have a coordinated and clear communication system between the social service agencies and a clear channel of communication from the social service agencies to first responders. • Encourage all social service agencies in Skid Row to develop and update individual disaster plans. • Have a Skid Row disaster plan training workshop

More Related