1 / 25

T hird Assessment cycle geology department: mathematic courses

FERNANDO GILBES SANTAELLA ASSESSMENT COORDINATOR UPRM-DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY fgilbes@uprm.edu. T hird Assessment cycle geology department: mathematic courses. Objectives of this Assessment. It was focused on the mathematics learning of the Geology students.

zaynah
Télécharger la présentation

T hird Assessment cycle geology department: mathematic courses

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FERNANDO GILBES SANTAELLA ASSESSMENT COORDINATOR UPRM-DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY fgilbes@uprm.edu Third Assessment cyclegeology department:mathematic courses

  2. Objectives of this Assessment • It was focused on the mathematics learning of the Geology students. • The collected data was used to evaluate the performance and attitude of our students in the mathematics courses. • This will provide the required information for improving the curriculum. • This is part of the overall process that we have started to evaluate how the curriculum is matching with the Geology student profile.

  3. Justification of this Assessment • Every undergraduate student in Geology has to take four courses in mathematics; they are: Mate 3171 (Pre-Calculus I), Mate 3172 (Pre-Calculus II), Mate 3031 (Calculus I), and Mate 3032 (Calculus II). • However, it is well known that our students have serious problems with these courses. • In many cases they have to repeat the mathematics several times, and some of them take longer to graduate because to these courses.

  4. Justification of this Assessment • It is not clear the reasons for this common problem; but some possibilities include: • a weak background from high school, • lack of motivation, • structure of the courses, • or a combination of these several factors. • In order to modify our curriculum and help our students with the mathematics it is very important to identify the source of the problems.

  5. Assessed Population • A questionnaire and a test were submitted to Geology undergraduate students at different levels of studies, from freshmen to seniors. (Around 25% of the entire population.) • Professors were also consulted in order to compare with students results. (Around 90% of the entire faculty)

  6. Pre-Intervention: Background knowledge of mathematics in the students entering the Geology Department These data were gathered in collaboration with the “Oficina de InvestigaciónInstitucional y Planificación (OIIP)”.

  7. College Board Results for Geology Students

  8. College Board Results by Faculty

  9. Pre-Intervention: Current status of the Geology students in the mathematics courses

  10. Per cent (%) of students that have repeated Math courses Seniors Once Twice Total Pre-Calculus I 18 9 27 Pre-Calculus II 36 18 55 Calculus I 18 36 55 Calculus II 67 17 83 Freshmen: 20% have already repeated Pre-Calculus I

  11. Pre-Intervention: Attitude toward the mathematics

  12. Per cent (%) of people considering that Mathematics is important in Geology

  13. Per cent (%) of people that like Math

  14. Per cent (%) of people considering that are good in Mathematics

  15. Per cent (%) of people feeling phobia toward Mathematics

  16. Per cent (%) of people feeling anxiety toward Mathematics

  17. Reasons for having problems with Mathematics Freshmen Seniors Professors High Low High Low High Low No Background in Math 13 88 56 44 43 57 No Background in Engineering 38 63 50 50 33 67 Wrong Math for Geologists 38 63 80 20 71 29

  18. Per cent (%) of people thinking that a new Math course for Geology is needed

  19. Intervention: The actual knowledge of mathematics in the students of the Geology Department

  20. Knowledge in Mathematics • The actual knowledge of the Geology students in mathematical skills was intended to be determined in the spring semester of 2008 using a Math test. • It consisted of three geology questions where they have to apply from simple to complex mathematical concepts.

  21. Knowledge in Mathematics • The students did not take seriously this test and most of them did not answer the questions. • It was not possible to collect representative data to reach good conclusions. • A new test and/or strategy must be developed to know the actual knowledge.

  22. Post-Intervention: The future of mathematics in the Department of Geology

  23. Recommendations • After completion the activities it is recommended the following steps: • Give suggestions to the curriculum committee in order to select the most appropriate mathematics courses for the Geology students. • And/or modify some Geology courses to complement with the required mathematical skills.

  24. Acknowledgements • The collaboration of Drs. Hernan Santos and Wilson Ramirez in preparing the math test and getting students data is highly appreciated. • Also, the participation of the Geology faculty in answering the questionnaire was very important. • Finally, thanks to the students!

  25. Thank you! questions?...

More Related