1 / 21

Elements of a good project to the European Commission

Elements of a good project to the European Commission. dr. ir. Matthijs Soede Poznan, 15 January 2007. At the start. Be aware that it is a competition Understand the process Good project has to be presented in a proposal. It is a competition….

zephr-horton
Télécharger la présentation

Elements of a good project to the European Commission

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Elements of a good project to the European Commission dr. ir. Matthijs Soede Poznan, 15 January 2007

  2. At the start • Be aware that it is a competition • Understand the process • Good project has to be presented in a proposal

  3. It is a competition…. • Play according to the rules of the competition • Workprogramma  kind of play • Guide for applicants  how to play • Evaluators  referees

  4. Structure proposal • A-part • A1 ‘Our idea’ – project outline • A2 ‘Who we are’ details from all partners • A3 ‘What it costs’

  5. Structure proposal • B-part 1.1. Concept and objectives 1.2 Progress beyond the state-of-the-art 1.3 S/T methodology/description project and associated workplan 2.1 Management structure and procedures 2.2 Individual participants 2.3 Consortium as a whole 2.4 Resources to be committed 3.1 Expected impacts listed in the work programme 3.2 Dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and mangement of intellectual property rights (IPR) 4. Ethical issues

  6. Structure proposal Scientific and/or technical quality • B-part 1.1. Concept and objectives 1.2 Progress beyond the state-of-the-art 1.3 S/T methodology/description project and associated workplan 2.1 Management structure and procedures 2.2 Individual participants 2.3 Consortium as a whole 2.4 Resources to be committed 3.1 Expected impacts listed in the work programme 3.2 Dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and mangement of intellectual property rights (IPR) . Ethical issues Implementation Impact

  7. Scientific/technical quality Innovation ! Problem State of the art Objectives • S/T methodology/description project • and associated workplan

  8. Keywords in the project • Structure • GANTT chart, PERT chart • work plan • work packages • tasks • deliverables • milestones

  9. Structure

  10. Structure

  11. From structure to timing Gantt chart

  12. TIME

  13. Implementation Management structure and procedures Individual participants Consortium as a whole

  14. Management structure • Important: • Logical structure • Who is responsible for what? • Way of communication?

  15. Individual Partners - Consortium • Excellence • Experience in relevant area • Facilities • Complementarity, balance • Possibilities for exploitation – end users • European dimension

  16. Impact • Contribution, at the European and/or international level, the expected impacts listed the work porgramme under the relevant topic/activity • Appropriateness of measures for the dissemination and exploitation of project results and management of intellectual property

  17. Impact

  18. Impact

  19. General control parameters • Timing  When • Quality  What and level • Finance  Resources • Information  State of the art, results, reporting • Organisation  Internal and external cooperation and organisation

  20. FP7 on Cordis cordis.europa.eu.int/fp7/home.html • SenterNovem/EG-Liaison Dr. Ir. Matthijs Soede (m.soede@egl.nl) Tel: +31 70 3735250 www.egl.nl

More Related