1 / 13

A Synthesis of Research on Requirements Analysis and Knowledge Acquisition Techniques

A Synthesis of Research on Requirements Analysis and Knowledge Acquisition Techniques. Terry Anthony Byrd Kathy L. Cossick Robert W. Zmud. MIS Quarterly – March 1992. Seyedreza Mousavi – Fall 2011. CIS 791. Categorization Scheme for RA and KA. Communications Obstacles Within obstacles

zofia
Télécharger la présentation

A Synthesis of Research on Requirements Analysis and Knowledge Acquisition Techniques

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Synthesis of Research on Requirements Analysis and Knowledge Acquisition Techniques Terry Anthony Byrd Kathy L. Cossick Robert W. Zmud MIS Quarterly – March 1992 SeyedrezaMousavi – Fall 2011 CIS 791

  2. Categorization Scheme for RA and KA • Communications Obstacles • Within obstacles • Techniques should enhance recall or understanding of end users and experts • Between obstacles • Techniques should aid participants’ communications • Among obstacles • Techniques should balance the needs of multiple users

  3. Categorization Scheme for RA and KA • The facilities for problem domain understanding • Information requirements • Process understanding • Behavior understanding • Problem frame understanding • A technique’s Locus of control • System analyst/ KE • End user/ Expert • Machine

  4. Categorization of RA and KA Techniques

  5. Categorization of RA and KA Techniques

  6. Categorization of RA and KA Techniques

  7. Categorization of RA and KA Techniques

  8. Categorization of RA and KA Techniques

  9. Elicitation Techniques and the Number of Domain Entities

  10. Strengths • Triggered an insightful argument • Proposed superior research extensions • Gave a holistic overview about RA and KA techniques • Provided the opportunity for comparing different techniques in RA and KA

  11. Weaknesses • It is not a rigorous research (three dimensions and elicitation mode categorization) • Superficial explanations • Disregarded the differences among different techniques • It is hard to understand table 3

  12. Extensions and Future Research • Make it more rigorous by comparing common RA and KA techniques in table 3 by various examples. • To discover similarities • To discover differences • Apply two of the most common used methods in a RA or KA research using experiment strategy • Put origin of each technique in table three • Plus research extensions proposed by the authors

More Related