1 / 14

ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP: UPDATE FROM THE CHAIRS OF ACADEMIC BOARD FORUM

ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP: UPDATE FROM THE CHAIRS OF ACADEMIC BOARD FORUM. Wayne Robinson Chair, Academic Board MIT Chair, CABF Steering Committee C. WHAT IS THE CABF [NUHEP]?.

zora
Télécharger la présentation

ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP: UPDATE FROM THE CHAIRS OF ACADEMIC BOARD FORUM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP: UPDATE FROM THE CHAIRS OF ACADEMIC BOARD FORUM Wayne Robinson Chair, Academic Board MIT Chair, CABF Steering Committee C

  2. WHAT IS THE CABF [NUHEP]? • In November 2011, the Chairs of Academic Boards of non-university private higher education providers met and resolved to form a body to advance the broad principles of good academic governance in the non-university higher education domain. • The agreed name is the Chairs of Academic Board Forum for non-university higher education providers-CABF [NUHEP]

  3. OBJECTS OF THE FORUM • To provide leadership in academic governance • To inform government agencies, the higher education sector and other interested parties on academic governance • To contribute to the development and dissemination of appropriate academic standards • To encourage quality assurance and benchmarking in the Chairs’ respective institutions and industry-wide

  4. OBJECTS OF THE FORUM • To act as a source of independent expertise on academic governance/standards • To provide a forum for Chairs of Academic Boards to discuss issues of significance to higher education • To provide continuing professional education for Chairs of Academic Boards • To facilitate collaboration on academic governance/standards between universities, industry bodies and NUHEPs.

  5. ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP: ISSUES OF SIGNIFICANCE • ACADEMIC GOVERNANCE • BENCHMARKING • GOOD PRACTICE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING • A CULTURE OF SCHOLARSHIP

  6. ACADEMIC GOVERNANCE • In conjunction with ACPET, the CABF commissioned a survey on Academic Boards • Highlights: • 94% of Boards ranged in size from 5-15 members • 94% have external members • 52% have student members • 68% have independent Chairs • 92% have a Charter or Terms of Reference • All have Standing Committees of various types

  7. ACADEMIC GOVERNANCE • Survey findings [continued] • 100% monitor academic standards and quality assurance • 90% advise on academic aspects of strategic plans • 96% determine academic policies and procedures • 86% are formally recognised as independent from corporate governance • 46% of Chairs serve on the Governing body • 66% undertake some benchmarking activity

  8. ACADEMIC GOVERNANCE • Conclusions and Challenges • Overall, structure and process for academic governance across the sector is credible • Performance against structure and process needs evaluation, and • CABF will lead in provision of a template by adopting guidelines for the sector-GOOD ACADEMIC GOVERNANCE IN NUHEPS-guidelines will be published widely

  9. BENCHMARKING • Benchmarking was a major topic at the CABF meeting in March 2013 • Highlights • Benchmarking a central feature of the Higher Education Standards Framework • The lack of performance benchmarks for the NUHEPs was recognised, especially comparative data on academic performance

  10. BENCHMARKING • CABF decided to establish a working party to address the question of benchmarking for NUHEPs with an emphasis on good practice benchmarking. • The report from the working party to lead to publishing guidelines-ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN NUHEPS: GOOD PRACTICE AND COMPARATIVE APPROACHES • Additionally, to explore with national bodies, the development of a standard set of data for benchmarking purposes for NUHEPs

  11. FOSTERING GOOD PRACTICE IN LEARNING AND TEACHING • At the March 2013 meeting, emphasis was placed on the fact that most NUHEPs consider themselves to be teaching only or teaching intensive institutions. • The reputation of institutions rise or fall on the quality of their teaching • Therefore, CABF must take a leading role in fostering good practice in learning and teaching

  12. SCHOLARSHIP AND NUHEPS • Scholarship and especially the culture of scholarship is of paramount importance to NUHEPs. • A few Institutions have addressed this through a ‘Scholarship and Research Plan’ and a ‘Continuing Professional Development Plan’ • For the NUHEP sector, CABF is addressing these two major aspects by,

  13. SCHOLARSHIP AND NUHEPS • Providing guidelines for-THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CULTURE OF SCHOLARSHIP THAT INFORMS LEARNING AND TEACHING IN NUHEPs • Facilitating workshops/seminars/conferences that address the issue of scholarship and NUHEPs

  14. CONCLUDING REMARKS • CABF to act as a vehicle for discussion and debate on academic governance at a national level • CABF to publish position papers/manuals on good practice in academic governance • CABF to provide leadership on academic good practice through workshops/seminars/conferences • CABF to initiate contact with major national players in the academic governance sphere

More Related