1 / 55

Treatment as a State and Other Ways to Manage Air Quality in Indian Country

Treatment as a State and Other Ways to Manage Air Quality in Indian Country. Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10. Overview. Clean Air Act alternatives - Treatment in the same manner as a state - Tribal Implementation Plans - Federal Implementation Plans Tribal inherent authority

zorina
Télécharger la présentation

Treatment as a State and Other Ways to Manage Air Quality in Indian Country

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Treatment as a State and Other Ways to Manage Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10

  2. Overview • Clean Air Act alternatives - Treatment in the same manner as a state - Tribal Implementation Plans - Federal Implementation Plans • Tribal inherent authority • Delegation • Funding alternatives

  3. What is TAS? • Congress gave EPA authority to treat tribes in same manner as the statute treats states • 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments Section 301(d)

  4. How is a Tribe eligible for TAS? • Federally recognized • Governing body carrying out substantial duties and powers • Jurisdiction or authority over area or activities to be regulated • Capable of carrying out activities necessary to administer program

  5. TAS under the CAA Section 301(d)(2) authorizes TAS where “The functions to be exercised by the Indian tribe pertain to the management and protection of air resources within the exterior boundaries of the reservation or other areas within the tribe’s jurisdiction;”

  6. Tribal Implementation Plans under the Sec. 110(o) • Implementation plans submitted by tribes shall be reviewed in the same manner as state plans. • An approved TIP “shall become applicable to all areas . . . located within the exterior boundaries of the reservation, notwithstanding the issuance of any patent and including rights-of-way running through the reservation.”

  7. EPA’s 1998 Tribal Authority Rule • Sec. 301(d)(2) required EPA to promulgate regulations specifying CAA provisions appropriate for TAS • EPA’s final Tribal Authority Rule (TAR) published Feb. 12, 1998, with rules at 40 C.F.R. Part 49. • TAR affirmed by U.S. Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit in Arizona Public Service Co. v. EPA. 211 F.3d 1280 (D.C. Cir. 2000), cert. denied 121 S. Ct. 1600 (2001).

  8. CAA Delegation of Authority • EPA interpreted CAA as statutory grant by Congress of jurisdictional authority to Tribes over Indian and non-Indian sources within reservation boundaries • For areas outside boundaries of reservation, the application must demonstrate tribal inherent authority

  9. Tribal Implementation Plans • A tribe with TAS may develop air programs under tribal law, subject to approval by EPA • Tribes are not bound by CAA deadlines for submittal of implementation plans • Tribes may operate CAA programs using a modular approach, or may chose to not undertake air quality work under CAA

  10. Other Issues from the TAR • Tribes seeking TAS for Title V program may demonstrate use of alternative review procedures (don’t need “judicial” review “in state court”) • Tribes need not demonstrate criminal enforcement authority over everyone • EPA later clarified public could submit comments on TAS applications directly to EPA [65 FR 1322, 1/10/2000]

  11. How to Show Authority for TAS • For applications covering areas within a reservation, the exterior boundaries must be identified with clarity and precision • “Reservation” includes lands held in trust for tribe (Tribal trust) and Pueblos

  12. EPA’s TAS Review Process • Tribe submits application (pre-submittal discussions with Region for programs) for each section of law • EPA Region determines completeness • EPA offers state a chance to comment on all CAA TAS; newspaper notice • EPA Headquarters review possible • Final decision by Regional Administrator

  13. TAS Application Notice EPA’s determination concerning the reservation boundaries or tribal jurisdiction over non-reservation areas apply to all future CAA applications from that tribe and no further notice to governmental entities shall be provided, unless the application presents different jurisdictional issues or significant new factual or legal information relevant to jurisdiction. See 40 C.F.R. § 49.9(f)

  14. TAS Decisions • 28 Tribes eligible for TAS to receive grants under sec. 105 of CAA • 10 Tribes eligible for treatment as “affected state” under sec. 505(a)(2) of CAA • 2 Tribes eligible for sec. 110 TIP

  15. ApprovedTribal Implementation Plans • Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe of New York, Dec. 10, 2007 (72 FR 69618) • Ambient air quality standards, permitting, open burning, review state permits and regional haze • Mohegan Tribe of Connecticut, Nov. 14, 2007 (72 FR 63988) • Nitrogen Oxide emissions for ground level ozone

  16. TAS Considerations • Once TIP is approved by EPA, tribe’s rules are federally enforceable • Compliance with EPA-approved TIP means compliance with CAA

  17. Government Accountability Office Review of TAS • GAO evaluated EPA’s TAS review process • Findings: EPA’s reviews take too long; (generally 1–4 years) • Recommendation: Develop a written strategy, with • Time frames for review process • Greater transparency

  18. EPA’s TAS Strategy • Common expectations • Tools for tribal applicants • Internal review procedures • Open communication with tribal applicants • Reaching out to other governments and the public

  19. Clean Air Act TAS for Programs • Attachment F: “Procedural Steps for Processing Tribal Applications for TAS Eligibility for Regulatory Programs under the Clean Air Act.” • Attachment G lists regulatory provisions governing TAS eligibility under CAA • Provides examples of documentation for addressing those provisions

  20. EPA’s Direct Implementation Authority under the CAA in Indian Country In TAR preamble, EPA stated it will protect air quality throughout Indian Country by directly implementing CAA's requirements under authority of sec. 301(d)(4) where Tribes have chosen not to develop or are not implementing aCAA program

  21. Federal Implementation Plans CAA gives EPA discretionary authority to promulgate Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) provisions as “necessary or appropriate” to protect air quality within specific areas of Indian Country. 40 CFR § 49.11(a)

  22. FIPs that Have Been Issued • Prevention of Significant Deterioration rules for Indian Reservations, 40 CFR 52.21 (1978) • Tri-Cities landfill, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, 40 CFR 49.22 (1999) • Astaris-Idaho LLC Facility (formerly FMC Corporation) in Fort Hall PM10 Nonattainment Area, 40 CFR 49.10711 (2000) • Federal Air Rules for Reservations (FARR) in EPA Reg. 10, 40 CFR Part 49, subpart C and M (2005)

  23. Region 10 FARR • Federal Air Rules for Reservations (FARR), published April 8, 2005 • Create basic federally-enforceable FIPs for 39 Indian reservations in ID, OR, & WA to protect human health and environment • Proposed rule 67 FR 11748-11801, March 15, 2002; final rule 70 FR 18074, April 8, 2005; General Federal Implementation Plan Provisions at 40 CFR Part 49, subpart C; Reservation Implementation plans at 40 CFR Part 49, subpart M

  24. FARR FIPs at 40 CFR § 49.131General Outdoor Burning Rules • Identifies materials that cannot be burned • Authorizes burn bans to protect air quality Garbage burning is now the nation’s largest source of dioxin emissions.

  25. FARR FIPs: Industrial Rules 40 CFR § 49.124 - 130 • Visible emission limits • Particulate matter limits • Fugitive emission limits • Sulfur dioxide limits • Sulfur in fuel limits industrial rules

  26. 40 CFR Part 71 Title V Regulations for Major Stationary Sources of Air Pollution • Title V permits only contain “applicable requirements”, as defined in 40 CFR §71.2. In the absence of such requirements, EPA issues “hollow” permits • Requirements of TIPs and FIPs must be included in Title V air operating permits issued to major stationary sources located where TIP and FIP apply

  27. FARR FIPs: Burn Permits • Nez Perce and Umatilla Reservations: Agricultural, Forestry & Open Burning Permits Photo UC Davis Fire Department

  28. FARR FIPs: Infrastructure Rules • Delegation to Tribes § 49.122 • General provisions and definitions • Air episodes & emergencies • Registration of sources • Non-Title V operating permits § 49.139 Atmospheric haze and air pollutionPhoto Southern Alliance for Clean Energy

  29. First Year of Implementation • Outreach workshops • FARR website developed • FARR Hotline • Burn bans called with daily conference calls to coordinate with tribes and state and local agencies • Delegation agreements in place for four tribes

  30. Implementation So Far • Over 100 source registered • Several Part 71 Title V permits issued with FARR requirements • Nine “synthetic minor” permits issued to avoid major source requirements • 12 burn bans called • Several enforcement actions for violating a FARR requirement

  31. Proposed Preconstruction New Source Review Rules • Nonattainment Area Major NSR Permits • Sources with at PTE at least 100 tons/year (or lower for some pollutants) • Requires Lowest Achievable Emission Rate technology (LAER) • Emission offsets • Minor NSR • Sources above thresholds • Synthetic minor sources

  32. The Inherent Authority of Tribes • Indian tribes were independent, self-governing societies long before contact with European nations • The U.S. recognizes tribes as “distinct, independent political communities” qualified to exercise powers of self-government by reason of their original tribal sovereignty

  33. The Jurisdiction of Tribes • Authority to protect tribal self-government and to control internal relations • Subject to the plenary power of Congress (may be unilateral) • Authority over nonmembers as granted or delegated by Congress • Inherent authority to regulate nonmember conduct is limited

  34. Enforcement of Tribal Requirements • Key issue: Does tribe wish to establish civil requirements under tribal law enforceable against both members and nonmembers in Tribal Court? • Requires both Tribal Regulatory and Tribal Adjudicatory jurisdiction

  35. Montana v. United States 450 U.S. 544 (1981) In general, absent express authorization by federal statute or treaty, a tribe’s inherent power over nonmember activity on fee lands does not reach beyond what is necessary to protect tribal self-government or to control internal relations

  36. The Montana Test Exceptions (1) Consensual relationships, or (2) The conduct of non-Indians on fee lands within the reservation when that conduct “threatens or has some direct effect on the political integrity, the economic security, or the health or welfare of the tribe.”

  37. Tribal Inherent Authority under the CWA and SDWA • For approval to administer water quality standards program, EPA “will require a showing that the potential impacts of regulated activities on the tribe are serious and substantial.” • Tribe also may be able to show jurisdiction though consensual relationship established by contracts, leases, or other written arrangements

  38. Potential Air Quality Non-Regulatory Roles • Indoor air quality monitoring and other indoor work • Woodstove change outs • Outreach and education • Solid waste management

  39. EPA Program Delegation • Delegate authority to a tribe to assist EPA administer a specific Federal air rule, while EPA retains responsibility for enforcement • Delegation allows the tribe to gain experience by assisting with implementation of Federal rules while deciding whether to establish tribal air program under CAA or tribal law

  40. Delegating EPA’s Title V Program • Delegation rules for Part 71 program in 40 CFR §§ 71.4(j) and 71.10 • Eligible tribe must meet TAS criteria • Permit fees must cover “permit program costs” with fees based up tons of emissions from source • Delegated tribe may collect fees for fully delegated part 71 programs

  41. Delegation of the Part 71 Program to the Navajo Nation • 14 Title V sources on Navajo Nation • Permit fees must be sufficient to cover “permit program costs” • Navajo Nation sought delegation of EPA’s Part 71 program before applying for TAS and a Part 70 operating permits program • Fees paid to Navajo because of fully delegated Part 71 programs

  42. FARR Delegation • Delegation provision in FARR (§ 49.122) allows tribes to establish agreement to administer one or more federal rules in effect on reservation • Proposed Preconstruction NSR Rules provides similar process at § 49.160(b) • Region 10 Delegation Agreements with Nez Perce Tribe and Confederated Umatilla Tribes for open burning permit programs; Quinault Tribe and Coeur d’Alene Tribe for general open burning, including calling “burn bans”

  43. FARR Delegation • EPA must consult with • “Appropriate governmental entities” outside reservation • City and county governments within reservation • After delegation agreement executed, EPA publishes • Notice in Federal Register • Announcement in local newspapers, and • Notes delegation in implementation plan

  44. INSPECTOR CREDENTIALS Sec. 114(a)(2) of the CAA provides “the Administrator or his authorized representative, upon presentation of his credentials, shall have a right of entry to, upon, or through any premises . . . and may at reasonable times have access to and copy any records, inspect any monitoring equipment . . . and sample any emissions which such person is required to sample.”

  45. Conducting Inspections as an Authorized EPA Rep. • Ensures better coverage by trained inspectors and better enforcement by EPA • Allows quicker response to emergencies, especially in remote areas • Provides increased environmental protection • Authorizes direct participation of tribe’s staff • EPA must first determine that issuing inspector credential is appropriate

  46. Funding Options • Sec. 103 of CAA • Sec. 105 of CAA • Indian General Assistance Program • Direct Implementation Tribal Cooperative Agreement • Performance Partnership Grant

  47. Review of Authorities Available for Tribal Program Financial Assistance Awards,Nov. 20, 2006 “The Beth Craig memo” Provides summary of available funding sources to support CAA activities by tribes

  48. Sec. 103 of the CAA • Project-oriented grants • Research • investigations • Surveys • To set up tribal air quality program • Initial air quality assessments, emission inventories, training, and involvement with local, regional and national planning • Performance period approved for no longer than 5 years • No match, but no guarantee of ongoing funds

  49. CAA Sec. 105 Grants • Focus on implementing tribal air program • Without TAS, 40% cost share • With TAS, 5% cost share first 2 years, then 10%, unless EPA finds hardship • After initial grant, no application or commitment of funds may be denied without prior notice and opportunity for a hearing [Sec. 105(e)]

  50. Indian General Assistance Program Grants • Assess air quality, work with EPA and other partners, identify problems and options for addressing them • Conduct ambient and indoor air monitoring • Develop an emissions inventory • Build capacity

More Related