1 / 83

SUSY Breaking by Meta-stable States

SUSY Breaking by Meta-stable States. Chia-Hung Vincent Chang. NTNU. Based on a work with Kuo-Hsing Tsao now at UIC. NTU theory seminar Dec 2010. Modernism in Architecture. Architecture is about building a residence. . A residence is supposed to project a feeling of home,.

zuriel
Télécharger la présentation

SUSY Breaking by Meta-stable States

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SUSYBreaking by Meta-stable States Chia-Hung Vincent Chang NTNU Based on a work with Kuo-Hsing Tsao now at UIC NTU theory seminar Dec 2010

  2. Modernism in Architecture

  3. Architecture is about building a residence. A residence is supposed to project a feeling of home, stable, stationary, you stay forever once you reach there.

  4. No matter how high reaching the building is, it always has a stable ground structure to anchor its excitation.

  5. even a skyscraper……

  6. There are exceptions, but mostly accidental…..

  7. This stable home feeling ground structure is very similar to the ground state in modern physics! Excited system always come back to the stable ground state and stay there unless excited again. The ground state is where the world resides.

  8. We think the structure of the stable ground state will determine how our daily world looks like!

  9. But…. In this ever-changing world, do we really need to stay at a stable home all the time?

  10. First the architectures of modernism allow it to flow…..

  11. then they are giving up the restrictions of stability …….. Rødovre, near Copenhagen, Denmark

  12. and start searching for the excitement of the freedom to stay ……… semi-stable Capital Gate tower of Abu Dhabi , 18 degree lean (4 times that of the Leaning Tower of Pisa)

  13. The contrast between the stabilty of a classical building and the freedom of a modern structure can be captured here. Luckenwalde Town Library (D) near Berlin

  14. The thing is If the architectures, who are supposed to know how to reside better than we do, have actually …… moved on, to give up total stabilty. Maybe it is also time for us physcists to appreciate the thrill and the ecstasy of being semi-stable.

  15. Breaking of Supersymmetry by being semi-stable. SUSYBreaking by Meta-stable States Chia-Hung Vincent Chang NTNU Based on a work with Kuo-Hsing Tsao now at UIC NTU theory seminar Dec 2010

  16. Breaking of Supersymmetry by being semi-stable. Breaking of Supersymmetry by Metastable States. Contents Fast SUSY primer SUSY breaking O’Raifeartaigh Model Why breaking SUSY is highly restricted The ISS proposal Matastable SUSY breaking Dienes’ and Thomas’ idea to realize ISS at tree level Our simplification of D & T Summary

  17. The difference between them is artificial. Symmetry Boson Fermion

  18. What’s the motivation? Quadratic Divergence We need a fine-tuning to get a small Higgs mass.

  19. SUSY forced the quadratic divergencies in the two loop diagrams to cancel. Scalar self interaction is related to Yukawa coupling.

  20. Coupling Unification

  21. String Theory Extra Space Dimension

  22. SUSY Semi-Primer The only non-trivial extension of symmetry in quantum field theory beyond Poincare symmetry and internal symmetry. This supersymmetry identifies bosons and fermions! The generators are fermionic (anticommuting, spinorial). SUSY algebra Every Boson comes with a Fermion partner, which behaves identically, and vice versa.

  23. Chiral Superfield It’s customary to organize SUSY multiplets by superfields: functions of xμ and an imaginary superspace fermionic coordinates θ. Superfield can be expanded in powers of θ. The expansion terminates soon. The components are various ordinary fields in a super-multiplet. Just like in tensor analysis, you put SUSY invariant constraints on superfield to get irreducible representations. Chiral Superfield combines a scalar φand a left-handed Weyl spinor ψ F(x) is a auxiliary field and can be solved in terms other fields by EOM.

  24. SUSYtransformations can be realized as translations in the superspace θ (plus a translation in space time x). Given a function of superfield Φ:W(Φ) SUSY invariants can be obtained by integrating W(Φ) over θ. Funnily, the integration over θ acts just like differentiation withθ. Wess-Zumino Model General renormalizable SUSY model of Chiral superfields. Masses of fermions Yukawa coupling between bosons and fermions W(Φ) controls interactions and masses. Superpotential

  25. Kinetic Energy term comes from: As a bonus, it also gives rise to scalar interactions. Equation of Motion solves F completely: For Wess-Zumino Scalar mass and Fermion mass are degenerate. Scalar self interaction is related to Yukawa coupling. It is this scalar potential that will determine the vacuum or vacua.

  26. Vector Superfield Vector Superfield combines a vector vand a left-handed Weyl spinor λ. In Wess-Zumino gauge: D(x) is a auxiliary field and can be solved in terms other fields by EOM.

  27. SUSY vacuum Take trace SUSY ground state has zero energy!

  28. Spontaneous SUSY breaking Ground state energy is the order parameter. SUSY will be broken if all the auxiliary fields can not be made zero simultaneously!

  29. Another way to see it: Spontaneous SUSY Breaking implies that under SUSY transformation: The transformation of components of a chiral superfield is The only possible Lorentz invariant non-zero VEV at r.h.s. is that of F.

  30. There is a mass relation for the fields spontaneously breaking SUSY. Spontaneous SUSY breaking can’t be generated in SM or one of the squarks will be too light. Hidden SUSY Breaking Sector SM Weak Mediating Sector: Messenger The mediation control the phenomenology. Messenger could be gravity, gauge interaction (SM), anomaly etc. Messenger can include some SM gauged superfields that also doubly play a role in breaking SUSY: Direct Gauge Mediation

  31. F-type SUSY breaking O’Raifeartaigh (1975) Model (OR model) There are as many F-terms as superfield. In general, there will be a solution for all the F-terms to vanish unless the superpotential is special-designed. Three chiral superfields: X,Φ2 don’t talk to each other. Generically we can’t make both vanish. One of the F’s is non-zero. SUSY is borken. (Consider this as the effective field theory of a more natural UV complete theory)

  32. O’Raifeartaigh Model (OR) (1975) For a specific example, These two auxiliary fields are two distinct functions of just one field. They can’t be zero at the same time. We can be sure before analyzing the vacuum structure, SUSY is broken.

  33. The vacuum (vacua) of OR model minimum conditions

  34. SUSY is broken by a non-zero F. The non-SUSY vacua is not one state, but a one complex dimensional space of degenerate. Pseudo-Moduli Space of Vacua The degeneracy will be lifted by one-loop effective potential: The minimum vacuum is at

  35. At this vacuum We can calculate the masses of scalars and fermions. Modulus Fields SUSY breaking massless Goldstino

  36. Dynamical SUSY Breaking OR models contain scales f that is put in by hand. These scales generate SUSY breaking scale and may need fine-tuning. It is natural that we (with Witten) prefer a non-perturbative dynamic SUSY breaking mechanism where scale are generated by dynamically, just like Λ in QCD. A QCD-like SU(Nc) gauge interaction that becomes strong at a scale Λ. Some hidden chiral superfield S carry the SU(Nc) charge Just like QCD, the fermion components of S forms condensate: This is the F component of the super-meson field It breaks SUSY at scale Λ.

  37. This scale can be naturally small compared to cutoff scale: Just like QCD Coupling Constant αdoesn’t need to be fine-tuned to generate a large hierarchy. On the other hand, FI and OR seems to emerge as the low energy effective theory of a dynamical SUSY breaking mechanism.

  38. Unfortunately, it doesn’t work! Witten Index(1982) Every bosonic state of non-vanishing energy pair with a fermionic state. If the Witten index is non-zero, there must be a state with zero energy and hence SUSY is unbroken! SUSY is unbroken. (The reverse is not true.) Witten index is invariant under changes of the Hamiltonian that do not change the far away behavior of the potential!

  39. Witten index is invariant under changes of the Hamiltonian that do not change the far away behavior of the potential! It is possible to calculate Witten index at weak coupling while applying the conclusion to strong coupling. Witten index is non-zero for pure SUSY Yang-Mills theory. Gauge theories with massive vector-like matter, which flows to pure Yang-Mills at low energy, will also have a non-zero Witten indices. SUSY is unbroken. For these two theories, SUSY is unbroken. SUSYQCD just isn’t like QCD. There is a stable supersymmetric vacuum.

  40. Four requirements for dynamical SUSY breaking Chiral Matter Anon-perturbative superpotential generated over the classical moduli space A tree level superpotential which completely lifts the classical moduli space U(1)R symmetry (3,2) model by Affleck, Dine and Seiberg (1984) It contains an U(1)R symmetry.

  41. U(1)R symmetry Affleck, Dine and Seiberg Model has an unbroken U(1)R symmetry. This is a serious problem. Boson and its superpartner have opposite charges. Superpotential W needs to be charge 2 to preserve U(1)R O’Raifeartaigh Model (OR) also has a un unbroken U(1)R symmetry. The R charges of the three chiral superfields:

  42. Generically it can be proven (Nelson and Seiberg 1994): An unbroken U(1)R symmetry will prohibit Majorana gaugino masses (R invariant) and render model-building very difficult.

  43. SUSYbreaking seems to be a rather non-generic phenomenon. “The issue of SUSY breaking by ground state has a topological nature: it depends only on asymptotics and global properties of the theory.” Breaking it by ground state will require an unbearable price. It is really a Fearful Symmetry! Tony Zee

  44. Enters Meta-Stable Vacua

  45. ISS Model A supersymmetric SU(Nc)gauge theory with Nf fundamental and anti-fundamental chiral superfields The vacuum is supersymmetric. It has a magnetic dual, IR free with a low energy effective theory: It could be calculated that there is a metastable SUSY breaking vacuum far away from the true vacuum: Its property can be illustrated by a similer low energy effective theory: OR model.

More Related