1 / 13

Chapter 7 Competency and Credibility

Chapter 7 Competency and Credibility. Competency:. A witness is properly able to take the stand and give testimony in court. Competency is the second test for the admissibility of evidence. Presumption: all witnesses, regardless of age, are presumed competent to testify.

Audrey
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 7 Competency and Credibility

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter 7 Competency and Credibility

  2. Competency: • A witness is properly able to take the stand and give testimonyin court. • Competency is the secondtest for the admissibility of evidence. • Presumption: all witnesses, regardless of age, are presumedcompetent to testify. • Burden of proof falls to the sideopposing the witness (prosecution or defense) to prove incompetency.

  3. Tests for Competency: 1) ability to observe & perceive. 2) ability to recall and narrate. 3) ability to understand the duty to tell the truth. Note: when challenged, determined through voirdireexamination (see text for examples).

  4. Witnesses with Possible Competency Problems: 1) YoungChildren: in CA, a child of any age can testify. However, the younger the child, the more likely the child will be unable to meet the three prong test for competency. 2) Senility: of one’s mental faculties have deteriorated with age or disorder, i.e., senile dementia or Alzheimer’s disease, a person could be proven incompetent to testify.

  5. CHILD WITNESS • child was an eyewitness as he watched his mother being systematically tortured to death by his father. • for two days, (d) repeatedly beat her with a golf club, baseball bat, a chunk of wood, and stabbed her with scissors.

  6. CHILD WITNESS • 4 year old witnessed his father stab an 18 year old photo booth employee to death during a robbery. • “I saw him stick a knife into her stomach and she yelled very loud!”.

  7. 3) PhysicallyHandicapped: a blind or deaf person is limited in the type of testimony that he/she can give. 4) MentalDefector Disorder: persons who are mentally incapacitated or insane persons are not competent witnesses. Note: a developmentally disabled person can be a competent witness if he/she can meet the 3 prong test.

  8. 5) ForeignSpeakingPersons: may not be able to narrate in English. The law provides for the appointment of a qualified interpreter. 6) HypnotizedPersons: in CA, persons who have been hypnotized are incompetent to testify as to any information recalled during or after hypnosis. Note: investigators can use facts recalled under hypnosis to investigate.

  9. Credibility: is the weight given towitnesstestimony by the trier of fact (the believability of the testimony). CA Jury Instructions direct the trier of fact to weigh the credibility of a witness’s testimony according to: • The length of time the witness had to observe the alleged criminal act and suspect • The stress, if any, to which the witness was subject at the time of the observation (see text for more).

  10. Impeachment: to attack the credibility of a witness. Accomplished either by: • Cross or re-cross examination • Introduction of rebuttal evidence Common Grounds for Impeachment: • Physical / mentalstate of the witness: affects the ability of a witness to accurately recall, communicate, etc. • Bias, Interest, or Other Motive: normally the witness testimony must be corroborated with other evidence.

  11. FinancialInterest: a witness may financially benefit from a guilty verdict. • Relationship to a Party in the Case: Family member, fellow gang member • Priordeclarations of hostility by the witness • Character Evidence: • general reputation (pro or con) for truthfulness, honesty, etc. • prior felony conviction involving moral turpitude or willingness to do evil.

  12. 4. Manner of Testimony: • Prior inconsistentstatements or testimony • Bias or demeanor of testimony towards the prosecution or defense • Admission of untruthfulness • Conduct of an investigation

  13. Rehabilitation: to restore or bolster the credibility of a witness and it takes place either: • During redirectexamination – by bringing in new facts or clarifying answers from previous testimony • By introducing corroboratingevidence through another witness which reinforces prior testimony

More Related