1 / 26

STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Fleet Safety Benchmarking Collaborating to Reduce Crashes, Injuries, and Fatali

STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Fleet Safety Benchmarking Collaborating to Reduce Crashes, Injuries, and Fatalities. Jack Hanley Executive Director Network of Employers for Traffic Safety (NETS) International Conference on Road Safety at Work Washington, D.C. February 17, 2009.

EllenMixel
Télécharger la présentation

STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Fleet Safety Benchmarking Collaborating to Reduce Crashes, Injuries, and Fatali

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Fleet Safety Benchmarking Collaborating to Reduce Crashes, Injuries, and Fatalities Jack Hanley Executive Director Network of Employers for Traffic Safety (NETS) International Conference on Road Safety at Work Washington, D.C. February 17, 2009

  2. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Contents • Background and mission………………………2 • Profile of participating companies…………….3 • Benchmark objectives………………………….4 • Business case…………………………………..5 • Scope…………………………………………….6 • Types of drivers and types of vehicles……….7 • Metrics and Program Elements……………….9 • Best practices summary................................11 • CPMM, Program Elements results................12 • Critical success factors..................................23 • Statistical analyses........................................24 • Summary and conclusions............................25 1

  3. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS…Fleet Safety Benchmarking • Started in 1994 • Mostly big pharma in early years • Funded by J&J through 2006 • Funded by Monsanto Co. 2007 • 2008 • Under auspices of Network of Employers for Traffic Safety • Collect global and by-country benchmark data Mission is to reduce crashes, injuries, fatalities among member companies and to model safe driving in the • communities where member companies operate 2

  4. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Profile of Participating Companies • Pharma • Ag • Automotive • Beverage • Chemical • Consumer • Delivery/Logistics mgmt • Insurance • Medical • Manufacturing • Oil • Service 28 Companies 249,000 Total Vehicles 6 Billion Total Miles Driven 104 Countries Anonymity is maintained 3

  5. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS…Benchmark Objectives • Improve the vehicle safety record of participating companies • Establish common definitions to permit cross-comparisons • Be a vehicle safety role model to other companies and organizations • Share best practices among participants • Provide a network to assess and resolve vehicle safety-related concerns/issues • Provide a network to assess the benefits of emerging vehicle technologies • Provide resources to assist companies wanting to develop a road safety program Share best practices to put in place a cost effective, integrated, and comprehensive vehicle safety program 4

  6. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Justification/Business Case • eco3 • economic cost of crashes • economic cost of poor driving habits • ecological cost to the environment 5

  7. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Benchmark Scope • Metrics • By country • Program Elements • By country/world area • Light Vehicles • Sedans, SUVs, Pick-up Trucks, Mini-vans • Medium (10,000-25,999 lbs.) • Heavy (>26,000 lbs) • 2 and 3-wheeled motorized 6

  8. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS…Categories of Drivers Covered by Survey 7

  9. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Types of Vehicles Covered by Survey 8

  10. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Metrics • Collisions • 46,734 Total • Composite: 8.34 CPMM • Range : 0.48-16.89 CPMM • Injuries • 1,334 Total • Composite: 0.25 IPMM • Range : 0.0-1.48 IPMM • Fatalities • 9 Total • % of Fleet in Crash • Composite: 20% • Range : 1-31% 9

  11. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Benchmark Program Elements • Policies • High risk drivers • Collision review process • Driver education/training • Commentary Drives • Crash review process • Deductible charge policy • Use of technology • Vehicle safety features • Metrics reporting process • Severity indices • Vehicle safety communication • Vehicle safety outreach programs • Green fleet initiatives • Vehicle safety critical success factors • Telemetrics and telematics Statistical analysis is done to determine which Program Elements correlate to lowest CPMMs 10

  12. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Best Practices (Based on lowest CPMMs) • Universal Practice • Seatbelts • Best Practices (Statistically significant) • Complete mobile phone ban by ALL LEADING companies • Collision reviews required by ALL LEADING companies Additional commonalities from 5 leading companies • Seat belts and air bags • Training for tenured drivers • Classroom format used • Immediate manager involved • Follow-up action required • Lessons learned shared • Mgmt meeting presentations 11

  13. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Fleet Size and Collision Frequency 12

  14. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… 2007 CPMM by Company • APMM Range: 0.48 to 16.89 • 27 companies • Company numbers assigned by APMM • Based on passenger-vehicle data 13

  15. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… 2007 CPMM by Country 2007 APMMs by Country (Passenger Vehicles) 3.59 BRAZIL CANADA 6.82 14.28 FRANCE 11.42 GERMANY 15.83 ITALY 14.95 JAPAN Country 13.51 MEXICO 13.69 RUSSIA 14.24 SPAIN 11.21 UNITED KINGDOM UNITED STATES 7.46 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 APMM 14

  16. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… CPMM by World Region 15

  17. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Fleet Safety Policies 16

  18. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Mobile Phone Policy 17

  19. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Ban vs. Permit Hands-free 18

  20. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Reasons for Not Banning Mobile Phones 19

  21. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Phone Records for Collisions 20

  22. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Reporting and Severity 21

  23. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Green Fleet Programs 22

  24. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Critical Success Factors ( Fleet Safety Manager Opinions) 23

  25. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS… Statistical Analyses Results • Based on the 2006 and 2007 data years, • the following correlate best with low CPMMs… • Frequent measuring of CPPM • Reporting of serious crashes to senior management • Frequent training of company drivers • Total cell phone use ban Note: There is no correlation between fleet size and CPMM 24

  26. STRENGTH IN NUMBERS…Summary and Conclusions STRENGTH IN NUMBERS Benchmark Program • Administered by Network of Employers for Traffic Safety • Annual survey • Global membership • Comprehensive • Metrics and Program Elements • Low cost/high return • For all fleet sizes, public and private organizations • Engages People, Processes, and Technology • Includes 2 newsletters • Annual post-benchmark best practices conference For information on participating in NETS’ STRENGTH IN NUMBERS Benchmark program, please email lstevens@trafficsafety.org QUESTIONS? 25

More Related