1 / 21

Pro-poor Development of BDS Markets for Micro/small Enterprise: Kenya Voucher Program Experience

Pro-poor Development of BDS Markets for Micro/small Enterprise: Kenya Voucher Program Experience. Presentation to Pro-poor Market Development Seminar Series Social Capital Thematic Group by William F. Steel Senior Adviser, Private Sector Africa Region, World Bank May 14, 2002. Outline.

Faraday
Télécharger la présentation

Pro-poor Development of BDS Markets for Micro/small Enterprise: Kenya Voucher Program Experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pro-poor Development of BDS Markets for Micro/small Enterprise: Kenya Voucher Program Experience Presentation to Pro-poor Market Development Seminar Series Social Capital Thematic Group by William F. Steel Senior Adviser, Private Sector Africa Region, World Bank May 14, 2002

  2. Outline • Demand-driven Approach to Business Development Services (BDS)for Micro/Small Enterprises (MSEs) • Kenya Voucher Program; Performance • Impact and Lessons Learned W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  3. I. Why Business Development Services (BDS) for Micro/Small Enterprise (MSE)? MSEs play important role in: • Poverty reduction and economic growth by generating employment and incomes • Empowerment of low-income workers • Development of entrepreneurship & skills BDS can raise MSE productivity by addressing key constraints: • Low skill levels • Weak management, financial accounts, marketing • Low level of technology • Weak linkages and support systems W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  4. Some Examples of BDS Non-production inputs from external supplier: W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  5. What Is Market Development? “Market”refers to transactions between willing demanders and suppliers • Demand: What do targeted clients really want and are willing to pay for? • Supply: More service providers & products focused on target group • Information readily available (needs assessment, services offered, quality) W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  6. Vision for Demand-Driven Approach to Developing BDS Markets Diverse range of services adapted to meet demands of large share of MSEs affordably Decentralized, sustainable provision, largely by private service providers W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  7. Old Supply-driven Approach Provider looks to government/donor BDS providers (public agency; donor program) Government/ Donor $$$ Beneficiaries Private BDS providers Most private providers left out W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  8. Shortcomings of Previous Approach to MSE Assistance Old Supply-driven approach: • Intervene with services provided or contracted directly by donor project or government agency • Train x number of people in z years Shortcomings: • Potential private providers are crowded out • Services not adapted to real needs of clients • No sustainability when subsidies run out W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  9. New Demand-led Approach Facilitation of both demand and supply Gov’t/ Donor Upgrading Funds Facil-itator Training providers Information Subsidy (voucher) $$$ Clients (MSEs) W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  10. Advantages of Demand-Driven Market Development Approach • Increased willingness to pay • Better leverage for subsidies • Providers have to adapt methods & content to targeted clients • Make services affordable • Services can be sustained and expanded with minimal subsidies W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  11. Why Vouchers? • Demand-driven • Trainee chooses and pays with voucher • Encourages private sector to respond • Fills information gap • Directory of providers and services • Incentives • Reduces cost to clients • Reduces risks and raises profits to providers • Transparent way of delivering subsidy to jump-start market development W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  12. II. Kenya Voucher Program for Jua Kali (MSE) Sector • Started just for training in manufacturing: • Upgrade skills & productivity in existing micro- enterprises; mainly self-employed • Also: Give women technical skills to start up • Shifted to market development approach • Introduced upgrading for training providers (vouchers for training of trainers) • Added vouchers for BDS (mainly small ent’s) • MSEs’ own Jua Kali Associations acted as voucher agents, received capacity-building and training to start savings & credit co-ops W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  13. Implemented Mainly through Private & Non-gov’t Agencies W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  14. Kenya Training Voucher Program:Performance 1997-2001 • 37,606 training vouchers issued, about 32,606 trained(60% women) [total MSE market in manufacturing estimated at 172,000] • Retarded by slow, delayed flow of budgeted funds, partly due to frequent changes of Ministry & Permanent Secretary (6 in 4 years) • Severe delays paying service providers • Trainers won’t offer new courses (in program) till paid for previous ones W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  15. Demand Response, 1997-2001 W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  16. Supply Response, 1997-2001 W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  17. III. Kenya Voucher Programme:Impact • Very positive for those trained • Significant increases in employment, assets and income for enterprises • 80% grew their business (13% control group) • 61% added business assets (21% control) • 59% of women seeking to enter had started a business • Increased willingness to pay cash directly to providers for subsequent training W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  18. Kenya Voucher Programme:Unanticipated Benefits • Skilled craftworkers(themselves Jua Kali)emerged as leading training providers: • Most-demanded by voucher clients • Adapted apprenticeship system to a more convenient format • Some have added training as a business line • Already conducting training outside voucher program W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  19. Kenya Voucher Programme:Benefits to Private Sector • Jua Kali Associations empowered • Provide members with useful information & vouchers • Many have formed SACCOs to help address financing needs from own resources • MSEs recognized as market for BDS • BDS providers in program have formed National Association for Technology Transfer and Enterprise Training W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  20. Drawbacks of Vouchers • Complex, costly to set up • SME Dept. has assisted in preparing operational & training manuals for easier replication in other countries • Can distort true market by subsidizing the transactions • Better to subsidize needs assessment, market information, monitoring • Subsidies can be used to jump-start market, but need exit strategy to phase out; however: • Subsidies addictive, hard to phase out W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

  21. Lessons Learned • Administer in private sector, not through Government Ministry • Provide training-of-trainers and other support to upgrade TPs, especially those from SME sector • Market development works, but takes time • Demonstration effect: Clients willing to pay for further training (=> need to reduce subsidies) • Need exit strategy: • Providers may become oriented toward vouchers rather than developing better products for mass market • Slow payment in Kenya forced TPs to cater more to the market, not subsidies W. Steel: Pro-poor Market Devt

More Related