The Omega Body Blueprint PDF eBook by John Romaniello

1. The Omega Body Blueprint By: John Romaniello

2. The Omega Body Blueprint Is it REALLY work as promised? Or… it’s just a scam – big fat lies that created only to take your hard-earned money? http://tinyurl.com/AccessPDFOmegaBodyBlueprint

3. The Omega Body Blueprint You shouldn’t rely on some nonsense reviews out there to find the answers. The fact is, many of those reviewers NEVER knew about the details of the program that should be the basis of their writings. http://tinyurl.com/AccessPDFOmegaBodyBlueprint

4. The Omega Body Blueprint So what’s next? Simply GET this “46 pages - premium ebook pdf” (download link below) to discover the facts and truth about John Romaniello’s program. http://tinyurl.com/AccessPDFOmegaBodyBlueprint

5. The Omega Body Blueprint After reading the whole ebook, you surely will be able to decide wisely wether the program is right for you or not. Goodluck with your fat loss / muscle building journey. http://tinyurl.com/AccessPDFOmegaBodyBlueprint

6. The Omega Body Blueprint Omega Body Blueprint Bodyweight Training Before the inception of weights, machines, genetic engineering, time travel, light sabers, or the Internet, people who wanted to get big and strong had to train using only their bodyweight. Although it originated out of “necessity,” this training method continues to be used because of its efficacy. The methodology of bodyweight training has a long and storied history, particularly in military settings. From the Spartans to the Romans to the Navy SEALS, bodyweight only training has been a consistent component of the methods of nearly every military organization from antiquity to the present. Admittedly, this is due in part to the inexpensive nature and the inherent convenience of not needing any equipment and being able to perform these exercises anywhere. However, expense and convenience notwithstanding, bodyweight workouts are undeniably effective for everyone from new recruits to drill sergeants. Outside of being used in the training of the world’s greatest warriors, bodyweight workouts continue to be used in the athletic training world, and are a key component of many of the best fat loss and muscle gain programs available, anywhere—like this one. Within the context of the program, bodyweight training was included for two reasons. Firstly, the aforementioned fact that bodyweight exercises have been empirically proven to be effective. Secondly, (speaking generally) bodyweight exercises are fundamentally different from most weight bearing exercises—even when the same muscles or movement patterns are involved. As an example, I don’t think anyone would debate that there is a tremendous difference between a bodyweight pull-up and a machine pull-down. This fact remains true despite the fact that the same muscles—the latissimus dorsi, teres major, rhomboids, et al.—are involved; this will also remain true if one were to use the same load. That is, use weight on the pull-down comparable to your bodyweight, which acts as the load on the pull-up. Of course, this raises the question: why are they different? Most bodybuilders or athletes or general gym d-bags will tell you it’s a matter of pull-ups being “hardcore” and pull-downs being kind of a wussy exercise. That argument is obviously not grounded in science, but the reasons why it is stupid isn’t really relevant to your goals. Instead, let’s focus on something substantial. Bodyweight exercises like pull-ups, push-ups, squats, lunges, and the like belong to a group of movements known as “closed kinetic chain exercises.” These are exercises performed where the hand or foot is fixed or in constant contact with a surface, and does not move relative to the body. Speaking generally, you are moving your body towards or away from an object. Compare these with exercises like the pull-down, bench press, leg press, or leg curls, which are known as “open kinetic chain exercises.” In contrast to CKCEs, open chain kinetic exercises are performed without the movement hand or foot being fixed, and instead allow movement relative to body position. In this case, you are moving something either towards or away from your body. This differentiation is of vital importance when considered within the context of a complete training paradigm. Going back to the example of the pull-up (CKCE) versus the pull-down (OCKE) we want look at the total picture. Physiologically, pull-ups require more in the way of coordinative ability and stabilization. More importantly: from a neurological standpoint, there is a tremendous difference between pulling yourself towards a fixed object and pulling an object towards yourself in a fixed position. While a complete discussion of what those differences are is a bit beyond the scope of this writing, there is a central point to make: incorporating bodyweight closed kinetic chain exercises into training programs stimulates your nervous system in a way that is completely different from open chain kinetic exercises. This has numerous benefits. Exposing your nervous system to different types of stimuli helps to increase overall neurological efficiency; therefore doing CKC exercises like a push-up will have carryover to and help with increases in OKC exercises like the bench press. Over time, this will help you increase both strength and mass. In addition, the neurological stimulation activates muscle tissue in a different way, allowing for greater total recruitment. This is great for hypertrophy, but also increases energy expenditure and fat loss. http://tinyurl.com/AccessPDFOmegaBodyBlueprint