1 / 42

Anthropological Theory

Anthropological Theory. Part I. Paradigm Change. Thomas Khun: Scientific thought is the result of a series of revolutions or “paradigm changes” A Paradigm: sums up the scientific views about what should be the object of research & how to go about solving scientific problems.

Leo
Télécharger la présentation

Anthropological Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Anthropological Theory Part I

  2. Paradigm Change • Thomas Khun: • Scientific thought is the result of a series of revolutions or “paradigm changes” • A Paradigm: sums up the scientific views about what should be the object of research & how to go about solving scientific problems

  3. Normal Science • The formulation of a paradigm is followed by a period of normal science, governed by the paradigm • Thus, anthropological ideas at any given time are reflection of the cultural environment of the anthropologists • The history of anthropology is a history of the values of the Western world

  4. What’s the Point? • To understand how current biases influence the way anthropologists have interpreted the cultures they study • Ask yourself how the cultures you study reflect the researcher’s bias • Ask what questions are not being asked because of the current paradigm

  5. Read & Think Critically ! • Anthropology has gone through a number of paradigm changes • We will begin with a brief history of the discipline • Know this background & understand the different theories as they apply to the cultures you study

  6. A Prelude • The 16th Century: • Age of Discovery • “Mercantilism” • European World View – chosen by God • Thomas Hobbes – the lives of savages are “nasty, brutish, & short”

  7. Enlightenment • 18th Century: • All people capable of progress toward civilization • “The Noble Savage” • 1800 Society for the Observation of Man • Comparative anatomy • Comparative Languages • Museum of Comparative Ethnography

  8. Context for Unilineal Evolution • 19th Century: • 1855 Berlin Conference • Colonialism – economic & political domination • Transfer of wealth to Europe • Increasing Racism

  9. Religion • 3 Orientations • Polygenists: Separate creations • Races are distinct species • Craniometry • Monogenists: One creation • Biblical interpretation • All races with ability to progress • “White Man’s Burden” • Degeneration: Regression after single creation

  10. Polygenists: Separate Creations Can’t Achieve Civilization

  11. Monogenists: Capable of Advancement

  12. Degenerationists Punishment for Falling from Perfection

  13. Charles Darwin • 1859 – Origin of Species • Natural Selection • Biological Evolution & dissatisfaction with biblical version of creation • Yet Polygenist-Monogenist debate continued through the 19th Century

  14. Herbert Spencer • “Survival of the Fittest” • Social Darwinism • Biological explanation of cultural differences • Evolution of mental capacity • European society became the standard by which “primitive” societies were judged to be inferior • “Primitive Man” = savage, small brain, dark skin

  15. Paradigm I. Unilineal Evolution • 19th Century Concept of Cultural Evolution • The process by which new cultural forms emerge out of older ones • Each Society is believed to PROGRESS through the same stages of development, from SAVAGERY to BARBARISM to CIVILIZATION • Only Europeans had reached civilization

  16. Civilization Barbarism Savagery P R O G R E S S

  17. Basis for Unilineal Evolution • Materialist approach • Application of biological evolution to culture • Interest in general laws, not history • Comparative method • Ranking of societies on a scale of progress • Armchair anthropologists

  18. #1 Edward B. Tylor • Founding father of anthropology • 1896 1st professor of anthropology • 1st to use “Culture” as a synonym for civilization • “Culture, or Civilization, is that complex whole…” • Animism: belief in spirits • Animism polytheism monotheism

  19. #2 Lewis Henry Morgan • 1851 – League of the Iroquois • Ethnical Periods “An attempt will be made to bring forward evidence of the rudeness of the early condition of mankind, of the gradual evolution of their mental & moral powers & of their protracted struggle while winning their way to civilization. The principle tribes of mankind can be classified, according to the degree of their relative PROGRESS, into conditions which can be recognized as distinct.

  20. What are the key factors? • Human society evolved through 3 major stages, each marked by a techno-logical break-through

  21. Strengths & Weaknesses: • Strengths: • Created a science of humans • New concepts, methods • Comparative approach—analyzed range of human variability • Developed systems of classification • Morgan: holistic approach • Weaknesses: • Racial determinists, ethnocentric ranking on a scale of progress • Biological determinism (reductionist) • Ignored history & environment • Justified political & economic domination (colonial context)

  22. Native Peoples Were… • Subjugated • Exploited • Oppressed • Objects of Genocide & Ethnocide • --All in the name of PROGRESS • How would evolutionists have written a book on Nisa’s culture?

  23. Paradigm II. Historical Particularism • Early 20th C. paradigm change • Professionalization of anthropology • Represents a reaction against unilineal evolution • Division between British & American anthropology • Omnibus approach

  24. Franz Boas • Born a German Jew • Father of American Anthropology • 1888 founded 1st anthropology department in the U.S. • Natural scientist • 1883 expedition to Baffinland, Inuit • Conversion—became ethnographer • Concern with disappearance of Native American cultures • Cultural Relativism

  25. Boas’ Activism • Critique of German Nazism • Fought against racism • Differences are due to culture, not race • Critique of unilineal evolution: “The history of human civilization does not appear as determined entirely by a uniform evolution the world over. Rather each group has its own UNIQUE HISTORY. It would be quite impossible to understand, on the basis of a single evolutionary scheme, what happened to any PARTICULAR PEOPLE”

  26. Assumptions of Historical Particularism: • Rejects general laws, ranking on a scale, progress • There are no simple or complex societies, only different societies • Unilineal evolution is based on speculation, is ethnocentric • Not Culture, but cultures • Culture, not race, determines behavior • Methodological rigor

  27. Culture Areas

  28. Strengths & Weaknesses • Strengths: • Cultural Relativism • History • Relation of culture & environment • Fieldwork • Weaknesses: • Ecclectic approach • Avoidance of synthesis • Weak on theory

  29. Paradigm III. Culture & Personality • 1930-50s – Students of Boas • Borrowed from psychology • Focus on the individual as the bearer of culture • Idealist approach: interest in personality & how individuals thought, felt • Studied process of enculturation, especially child development

  30. 2 related approaches: • Intra-cultural variation • Inter-cultural variation • Studied individuals cultural patterns of individual societies cross-cultural comparisons to arrive at generalizations • This is Shostak’s approach in Nisa

  31. #1 – Ruth Benedict • 1923 1st woman professor of anthropology • Child rearing molds personalities to a basic type • Each culture develops a limited number of themes – cultural configurations – that dominate the thought & behavior of its members • Each culture selectively chooses among an infinite number of traits

  32. Benedict’s Comparative Approach • Kwakiutl = individualistic, competitive, intemperate, egoistic • Potlatch: Give away enormous quantities of goods, complete with rival groups • “Dionysian” (Greek god of excess) • Zuñi = control their emotions, value sobriety & inoffensiveness, do not boast, restrained behavior, cooperative • “Apollonian” (Greek god Apollo)

  33. Overgeneralizations • Cora Dubois – Rorschach tests • 37% fit modal personality • 22% fall outside the modal personality • 40% are “deviant” • Benedict: The Chrysanthemum & the Sword

  34. #2 – Margaret Mead • 1928 Coming of Age in Samoa • Enculturation & its effect on puberty • Nature-nurture debate • Psychological changes of puberty are not biologically, but culturally conditioned • Samoa – Sexual liaisons, no stigma for out-of-wedlock births • Comparison with U.S. society

  35. Derek Freeman: 1983, Margaret Mead & Samoa: The Making & Unmaking of an Anthropological Myth • Rather than the carefree adolescent sexual experimentation Mead described, Samoans have a “virginity complex” • How to explain these different interpretations?

  36. Mead’s Sex & Temperament

  37. Mead’s Sex & Temperament

  38. Mead’s Sex & Temperament

  39. Mead’s Sex & Temperament

  40. Mead’s Sex & Temperament

  41. “Man made for himself a fabric of culture within which each human life was dignified by form & meaning. Each people makes this fabric differently, selects some clues & ignores others, emphasizes a different sector of the whole arc of human potentialities, as each culture creates distinctively the social fabric in which the human spirit can wrap itself—it may bend every individual born within it to one type of behavior”

  42. Strengths & Weaknesses • Strengths: • Popularized anthropology • Focus on culture as a system of meaning • Attention to variation among societies • Attention to the individual as a bearer of culture • Weaknesses: • Broad, impressionistic generalizations based on personal impressions • Lack of history • Stereotyping—national character studies • Political implications

More Related