1 / 24

A decrease in mortality in the MSF catchment area in Sierra Leone between 2006 and 2007 – why?

A decrease in mortality in the MSF catchment area in Sierra Leone between 2006 and 2007 – why?. Sibylle Gerstl 1 , Michel van Herp 2 , Cecile Bassi 3 , Samuel Baker 4 , Maureen Billiet 2 1 MSF, London, United Kingdom 2 MSF , Brussels, Belgium 3 MSF , Bo, Sierra Leone

Lucy
Télécharger la présentation

A decrease in mortality in the MSF catchment area in Sierra Leone between 2006 and 2007 – why?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A decrease in mortality in theMSF catchment area in Sierra Leone between 2006 and 2007 – why? Sibylle Gerstl1, Michel van Herp2, Cecile Bassi3,Samuel Baker4, Maureen Billiet2 1 MSF, London, United Kingdom 2 MSF, Brussels, Belgium 3 MSF, Bo, Sierra Leone 4 Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone

  2. Overview • 2006 and 2007 • Retrospective mortality studies • In MSF catchment area in Sierra Leone • Substantially different results

  3. History • 2006Commitment to stay • High rates of mortality due to malaria • Mainly in children < 5 years of age • Now focus on malaria • Free diagnosis, treatment, prevention • In clinics and outreach program

  4. Study site - MSF catchment area Bo Pujehun • Population of152 000 persons • Living in 334 villages • Malaria perennial • No peakduring year

  5. Objective • To estimate retrospectively • Crude mortality rate (CMR) • Under 5 years mortality rate (U5MR) • Under 2 years mortality rate (U2MR) • To obtain an indication of malaria / fever as reported causesof death

  6. Survey Methodology (1) • Three-stage, cross-sectional survey • 2006: 30 clusters x 30 households • 2007: 40 clusters x 40 households • Standardized questionnaires

  7. Survey Methodology (2) 97 days 01/2006 12/2006 16.06.African Child Day 20.09. 201 days 12/2007 01/2007 09.04.Easter Monday / Rabbil awal 20.10. • Recall period

  8. Study Population 2006 2007 Sample population 5179 11358 Children < 5 years 1244 24% 2324 21%

  9. Deaths / 10 000 / day CMR 10 U5MR 7.3 U2MR 7 6 5 4 3.7 3 2.6 2 1.8 1.3 1 0.7 2007 2006

  10. Malaria /feveras reported causes of death [%]

  11. Malaria /feveras reported causes of death [%] *p=0.04

  12. Methodological limitations • Differences in training and supervision of 2006 and 2007 studies • Potential recall bias in the reported causes of death

  13. Summary • Mortality results 2007 lower than 2006 • Target population in a stable conditionof non-emergency • CMR + U5MR in line with levels considered normal for developing countries

  14. Discussion – MSF interventions (1) Internal MSF interventions for lower mortality rates in 2007 • Actions taken to reduce morbidity / mortality for malaria in the catchment area • Since 2005 • Free malaria diagnosis and treatmentin all MSF supported health structures • Gondama Referral Centre • 5 community health centres

  15. Discussion – MSF interventions (2) • Since 2007 • Introducing malaria diagnosis and treatment in low-level health structures • On-going support of primary health units (PHU) for malaria management • Today 27 PHUs • In 2006/2007 • 65 000 bednets distributed • Education-sensitisation programs

  16. Discussion – MSF interventions (3) • Since November 2007 • Network of community health volunteers on home management of uncomplicated malaria • Goal: 300 villages • Human resources • End of 2006: 322 • Today: 364 today (+13%)

  17. Discussion – Other reasons • Probable slight overestimation of mortality rates in 2006 • Population might not rememberAfrican Child Day • Potential external factors • Different rain patterns between2006 and 2007? • Harvest not comparable?

  18. Bear in mind… • Difficult to attribute changes in mortality rates to the impact of interventions • Individual programmes should not entirely judged on mortality data

  19. Recommendations • Establish a prospective mortality surveillance system • Repeat mortality survey end of 2008 • Assess CMR and U5MR trends We still have to work hard together to fight malaria!

  20. Acknowledgements • Ministry of Health and Sanitation for authorization and support of the study • Desk, the capital and field teams of MSF-Belgium for all their outstanding help and the warm welcome • All the families in the MSF catchment area in Bo and Pujehun district,Sierra Leone

  21. 2007: Slept under ITN • 49.1% slept under ITN (95%CI 43.3–55.4) • 66.9% of children < 5 years (95%CI 59.3–74.6) • 59.8% of women aged 15 to 49 years being > 3 months pregnant (95%CI 52.3–66.9)

  22. 2007: Education Status In Sub-Population of 15 years and older (n=6496) • 16.1% able to read and write(95%CI 13.5–18.8) • 26.5% male study population (95%CI 22.5–30.5) • 7.9% female study population (95%CI 6.0–9.8) (p < 0.0001)

  23. Malnutrition (1) Weight-for-height z-scores (NCHS reference curve) • Global acute malnutrition • 2006: 5.0 (95%CI 3.7–6.3) • 2007: 5.8 (95%CI 4.1–6.9) • Severe acute malnutrition • 2006: 0.9 (95%CI 0.3–1.4) • 2007: 0.4 (95%CI 0.2–1.1)

  24. Malnutrition (2) Height-for-age z-score • 2006: 55.6 (95%CI 50.8–60.4) • 2007: 30.8 (95%CI 27.4–34.1)

More Related