2. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators 1) Number of implemented approved Instructional Supervisory Plans Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total 1. Has performed instructional supervision to achieve learning outcomes 1. Instruction al Supervisory Plans 12/12 Schools have approved Instructional Supervisory Plans 12/12 Schools have approved Instructional Supervisory Plans 12/12 Schools have approved Instructiona l Supervisory Plans 12/12 Schools have approved Instructio nal Superviso ry Plans 12 out of 12 schools have performed instruction al supervision to achieve learning outcomes

3. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives 1. Has performed instructional supervision to achieve learning outcomes Outputs Output Indicators 1) Number of submitted analyzed Instructional Supervisory Reports per school 1) Number of monitored schools /CLCs using the monitoring tool provided by the SDO and M&E tool provided by the EPSs per subject area Jan-Mar 12/12 Schools have submitted Instructional Supervisory Report- 1st to 3rd quarter 4th quarter-(on-going) April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total 2. Instructional Supervisory Reports Per School 12/12 Schools were monitored (monitoring tools attached) -Monitoring and Supervision Tool for School Heads -Quarterly Monitoring Tool for Quarter Test -Monitoring and Evaluation Tool in Reading-English & Filipino -Monitoring Tool for Utilization on Contextualization 3. Utilization of M&E Systems and Tools using the monitoring tool provided by the SDO for SHs and M&E Tools crafted by the EPS

4. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators 1) Number of schools implementing the Basic Education Curriculum under MATATAG, SCPs, and learning center in compliance to quality standards Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total 1. Has performed instructional supervision to achieve learning outcomes 12 out of 12 schools are compliant in implementi ng BEC under MATATAG , SCPs, and in compliance to quality standards 4. Consolidated results of M and E and analysis on curriculum implementation per district 12/12 schools have been implementin g the BEC Curriculum in compliance to quality standards 12/12 schools have been implementing the BEC Curriculum in compliance to quality standards 12/12 schools have been implementin g the BEC under MATATAG with teachers trained in Kiner, Grade 1, 4 and Gr.7 12/12 schools have been implementin g the BEC under MATATAG with teachers trained in Kiner, Grade 1, 4 and Gr.7

5. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators 1) Number of schools/CLC S implementing needs based curricular PPAs (Programs, Projects, Activities) compliant to standard Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total 1. Has performed instructional supervision to achieve learning outcomes 12/12 schools *10 elem schools 1 Integrated Sch & 1 National High Sch implemented the PPAs aligned with the ESIP 12/12 schools *10 elem schools 1 Integrated Sch & 1 National High Sch implemented the PPAs aligned with the ESIP 12/12 schools *10 elem schools 1 Integrated Sch & 1 National High Sch implemented the PPAs aligned with the ESIP 12/12 schools *10 elem schools 1 Integrated Sch & 1 National High Sch implemente d the PPAs aligned with the ESIP 12 out of 12 schools implement ed needed PPAs compliant to quality standards. 5.Consolidated Results of M&E and Analyses per district Every Quarter

6. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators 2) Number of M&E results analyzed Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total 1. Has performed instructional supervision to achieve learning outcomes 12/12 schools *10 elem schools 1 Integrated Sch & 1 National High Sch have results of M & E and Analysis every quarter 12/12 schools *10 elem schools 1 Integrated Sch & 1 National High Sch have results of M & E and Analysis every quarter 12/12 schools *10 elem schools 1 Integrated Sch & 1 National High Sch have results of M & E and Analysis every quarter 12/12 schools *10 elem schools 1 Integrated Sch & 1 National High Sch have results of M & E and Analysis every quarter 12/12 schools *10 elem schools 1 Integrated Sch & 1 National High Sch have results of M & E and Analysis every quarter . 5.Consolidated Results of M&E and Analyses per district Every Quarter

7. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators 1) Number of schools/CLCs monitored and evaluated regarding the implementation/ utilization of contextualized curriculum Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total 2. Has conducted validation of the SHs instructional supervisory plans and accomplishme nt report across learning areas as a way of monitoring the implementatio n of contextualized curriculum 1. Accomplishe d monitoring and evaluation tool regarding the implementati on/utilizatio n of contextualize d curriculum 12/12 schools were monitored and evaluated on the implementation & utilization of contextualized curriculum 12/12 schools were monitored and evaluated on the implementatio n & utilization of contextualized curriculum 12/12 schools were monitored and evaluated on the implementation & utilization of contextualized curriculum 12/12 schools were monitored and evaluated on the implementati on & utilization of contextualize d curriculum 12/12 schools were monitored and evaluated on the implementati on & utilization of contextualize d curriculum 2) Inventory of developed and/or contextualized learning resources

8. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators Number of schools and/ or learning center that can access and/ or utilize learning resources Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total 12/12 schools has each own systems/stra tegy on how the teachers can access the contextualiz ed learning resources 3. Consolidated report on the utilization of learning resources 1. Report on the developed and/ or contextualiz ed learning resources 1. 12/12 schools has each own systems/strategy on how the teachers can access the contextualized learning resources 12/12 schools has each own systems/strate gy on how the teachers can access the contextualize d learning resources 12/12 schools has each own systems/strat egy on how the teachers can access the contextualize d learning resources 12/12 schools has each own systems/stra tegy on how the teachers can access the contextualiz ed learning resources

9. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators Number of consolidated Literacy and Numeracy Test Results with Analysis and number of MPS analyzed Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total 12/12 schools has consolidate d literacy results *12/12 schools submitted sch consolidate d results in RMA, Numeracy & Quarterly MPS 4. Has accounted for learning outcomes of schools and centers viz-a-viz goals and targets 1. Consolidatio n of Literacy and Numeracy Test Results, consolidated MPS per school, per district 1. *12/12 schools has consolidated literacy results *12/12 schools submitted sch consolidated results in RMA, Numeracy & Quarterly MPS *12/12 schools has consolidated literacy results *12/12 schools submitted sch consolidated results in RMA, Numeracy & Quarterly MPS *12/12 schools has consolidated literacy results *12/12 schools submitted sch consolidated results in RMA, Numeracy & Quarterly MPS *12/12 schools has consolidate d literacy results *12/12 schools submitted sch consolidate d results in RMA, Numeracy & Quarterly MPS

10. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators Number of capacitated SHs and teachers Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total 5. Has provided appropriate guidance and instructional supervision to SHs in gathering data on their strength and development needs in managing learning delivery towards improved instructional leadership practices 1. Training Needs Assessment for SHs 1. 12/12 schools were provided guidance & Instructional supervision 12/12 schools were provided guidance & Instructional supervision 12/12 schools were provided guidance & Instructional supervision 12/12 schools were provided guidance & Instructional supervision 12/12 schools were provided guidance & Instructional supervision 2. DLAC/SLAC Design and Activity Proposal 2. Number of conducted DLAC/SLAC *12/12 schools conducted SLACs & INSETs- Attached is the Dist List of SLACs & INSETs conducted *12/12 schools conducted SLACs & INSETs- Attached is the Dist List of SLACs & INSETs conducted *12/12 schools conducted SLACs & INSETs- Attached is the Dist List of SLACs & INSETs conducted *12/12 schools conducted SLACs & INSETs- Attached is the Dist List of SLACs & INSETs conducted *12/12 schools conducted SLACs & INSETs- Attached is the Dist List of SLACs & INSETs conducted

11. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators 3. Number of submitted Accomplishment Report/DLAC/S LAC conducted Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total 5. Has provided appropriate guidance and instructional supervision to SHs in gathering data on their strength and development needs in managing learning delivery towards improved instructional leadership practices 3. Completion Report after the conduct of DLAC/SLAC **21 Basic/Action Research and PIP were submitted.All research proposals are in progress **21 Basic/Action Research and PIP were submitted.All research proposals are in progress **21 Basic/Action Research and PIP were submitted.All research proposals are in progress **21 Basic/Action Research and PIP were submitted.All research proposals are in progress **21 Basic/Action Research and PIP were submitted.A ll research proposals are in progress 4. Copy of submitted research proposals/ innovations

12. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Objectives Outputs Output Indicators Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec 12/12 implemented the DepEd no. 21,s.2019 on the subject allotment as reflected on the SF7.Attached Class Program and CUs Fridays 12/12 implemented the DepEd no. 21,s.2019 on the subject allotment as reflected on the SF7.Attached Class Program and CUs Fridays 12/12 implemented the DepEd no. 21,s.2019 on the subject allotment as reflected on the SF7.Attached Class Program and CUs Fridays 12/12 implemented the DepEd no. 21,s.2019 on the subject allotment as reflected on the SF7.Attached Class Program and CUs Fridays 12/12 schools implemente d DO #21, S. 2019 ON Subjects allotment and teaching loads 6. Has managed instructional system through equitable distribution of teaching loads and observe teacher-learner ratio 1. Reviewed Class Program, School Form (SF) 7 and Teacher Program 1. Number of school implementing DepEd Order No. 21, 2019 on subject’s allotment and teaching heads

13. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators Number of monitored implemented REAP in the schools handled Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total 6. Has managed instructional system through equitable distribution of teaching loads and observe teacher- learner ratio 12/12 schools have submitted REAP. The REAPs are reviewed & endorsed at the division. Implementation is on-going in their respective schools. 12/12 schools have submitted REAP. The REAPs are reviewed & endorsed at the division. Implementation is on-going in their respective schools. 12/12 schools have submitted REAP. The REAPs are reviewed & endorsed at the division. Implementatio n is on-going in their respective schools. 12/12 schools have submitted REAP. The REAPs are reviewed & endorsed at the division. Implementati on is on- going in their respective schools. 12/12 schools have submitted REAP. The REAPs are reviewed & endorsed at the division. Implementa tion is on- going in their respective schools. 2. Report on the reviewed/endors ed Reentry Action Plan (REAP) submitted (Depends on the submitted REAP)

14. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total 6. Has managed instructional system through equitable distribution of teaching loads and observe teacher-learner ratio 3. Copy of the List/ Inventory of Instructional Materials with acknowledgemen t receipt signed by the teacher 12/12 schools has inventory of Ims with acknowledge ment receipt signed by the teachers 12/12 schools has inventory of Ims with acknowledge ment receipt signed by the teachers 12/12 schools has inventory of Ims with acknowledge ment receipt signed by the teachers 12/12 schools has inventory of Ims with acknowledg ement receipt signed by the teachers 12/12 schools has inventory of Ims with acknowledg ement receipt signed by the teachers

15. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators Number of Coaching and Mentoring Plan implemented Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total 6. Has managed instructional system through equitable distribution of teaching loads and observe teacher-learner ratio Provided the 12 schools w/ a Coaching & Mentoring Plan duly implemented as scheduled Provided the 12 schools w/ a Coaching & Mentoring Plan duly implemented as scheduled Provided the 12 schools w/ a Coaching & Mentoring Plan duly implemented as scheduled Provided the 12 schools w/ a Coaching & Mentoring Plan duly implemented as scheduled 12 schools implemente d Coaching and mentoring Plan 4. Coaching and Mentoring Plan every quarter

16. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators Number of school heads and teachers coached and mentored in the schools handled Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total All school heads and teachers were coached and mentored in the districts thru school visitation, conducting district activities like GAD, etc. All school heads and teachers were coached and mentored in the districts thru school visitation, conducting district activities like GAD, etc. All school heads and teachers were coached and mentored in the districts thru school visitation, conducting district activities like GAD, etc. All school heads and teachers were coached and mentored in the districts thru school visitation, conducting district activities like GAD, etc. All school heads and teachers were coached and mentored in the districts thru school visitation, conducting district activities like GAD, etc. Coaching and Mentoring Accomplishment Report Every Quarter 7. Has designed Coaching and Mentoring Plan for SHs and Teachers Approved Action Research Accomplishment Report/ Approved REAP accomplishment Report

17. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total 22 Action research proposal were approved by the district, some of the schools have approved REAP and accomplishment report 22 Action research proposal were approved by the district, some of the schools have approved REAP and accomplishmen t report 22 Action research proposal were approved by the district, some of the schools have approved REAP and accomplishme nt report 22 Action research proposal were approved by the district, some of the schools have approved REAP and accomplishm ent report 22 Action research proposal were approved by the district, some of the schools have approved REAP and accomplish ment report Approved Action Research Accomplishment Report/ Approved REAP accomplishment Report 7. Has designed Coaching and Mentoring Plan for SHs and Teachers

18. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators Number of approved/ reviewed/ endorsed basic and/or action researches or curriculum innovations implemented in school levels Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total 8. Has conducted/ reviewed/ endorsed basic and/or action research or innovations on curriculum/ins tructional management and supervision Basic and/or Action Research and curriculum innovations 22 Action research proposal were approved by the district. 22 Action research proposal were approved by the district. 22 Action research proposal were approved by the district. 22 Action research proposal were approved by the district and division-in progress. rt 22 Action research proposal were approved by the district and division-in progress.

19. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total 22 Action research proposal were reviewed and approved by the district. 22 Action research proposal were reviewed and approved by the district. 22 Action research proposal were reviewed and approved by the district. 22 Action research proposal were reviewed and approved by the district. 22 Action research proposal were reviewed and approved by the district. 2. Has initiated research and innovations contributin g to the department s advanceme nt Basic and/or Action Research and curriculum innovations reviewed (Depends on the number of action research submitted for reviewed) Number of proposed and completed Basic and/or Action Research and curriculum innovations reviewed

20. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators Number of Schools/C LCs the consolidat ed quarterly assessmen t result/ana lysis Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total • • 10. Has guided and supported the effective implementatio n of the management of learning assessment in schools and learning centers for better learning outcomes Compendium of instructional interventions / best practices of the district/schoo ls based on analyzed quarterly assessment 12/12 schools have consolidated quarterly assessment results/analys is 12/12 schools have consolidate d quarterly assessment results/anal ysis 12/12 schools have consolidate d quarterly assessment results/anal ysis 12/12 schools have consolidated quarterly assessment results/analys is 12/12 schools have consolidated quarterly assessment results/analy sis

21. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total 10. Has guided and supported the effective implementatio n of the management of learning assessment in schools and learning centers for better learning outcomes All schools submitted reports on assessment of learning outcomes All schools submitted reports on assessment of learning outcomes All schools submitted reports on assessment of learning outcomes All schools submitted reports on assessment of learning outcomes All schools submitted reports on assessment of learning outcomes • • Assessment results per district Report on instructional interventions implemented in schools/LCs Number of Reports on assessment of learning outcomes submitted at the SDO per district 12/12 schools have improved learning assessment outcomes in the learning area per quarter. 12/12 schools have improved learning assessment outcomes in the learning area per quarter. 12/12 schools have improved learning assessment outcomes in the learning area per quarter. 12/12 schools have improved learning assessment outcomes in the learning area per quarter. 12/12 schools have improved learning assessment outcomes in the learning area per quarter. Number of schools with improved learning assessment outcomes in the learning area per quarter •

22. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators Number of developed localized/conte xtualized assessment tools Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total • • • Has led the team development of contextualized assessment tools to diagnose learners and determine their mastery level in the different learning areas Inventory/list of Localized/ contextualized assessment tools (diagnostic, and summative, tests) 12/12 schools have developed contextualized assessment tools. 12/12 schools have developed contextualize d assessment tools. 12/12 schools have developed contextualize d assessment tools. 12/12 schools have developed contextualiz ed assessment tools. 12/12 schools have developed contextuali zed assessmen t tools. • Has requested and distributed instructional materials

23. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators Number of schools and CLCS with TA needs assessment/anal ysis report Number of submitted accomplished TA Plans Number of school heads, teachers, provided with TA along their identified needs in the subject area Number of approved TA Plans Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total • • TA Needs • Assessment Report Every Quarter • Approved TA Plan (Q1) • TA contract/agree ment (Every Quarter) • Has provided technical assistance to school heads, on curriculum and special curricular programs programs, projects, activities (PPAs) implementation for the improvement of instructional leadership competence, learning resource management, learning delivery, and assessment of learning 12/12 Schools have consolidated TA needs, assessment reports every quarter, TA Plan and accomplishment report. All schools head, department head and more or least 5 teachers provided TA. 12/12 Schools have consolidated TA needs, assessment reports every quarter, TA Plan and accomplishment report. All schools head, department head and more or least 5 teachers provided TA. 12/12 Schools have consolidated TA needs, assessment reports every quarter, TA Plan and accomplishment report. All schools head, department head and more or least 5 teachers provided TA. 12/12 Schools have consolidated TA needs, assessment reports every quarter, TA Plan and accomplishmen t report. All schools head, department head and more or least 5 teachers provided TA. 12/12 Schools have consolidated TA needs, assessment reports every quarter, TA Plan and accomplishme nt report. All schools head, department head and more or least 5 teachers provided TA. Consolidated • • TA Accomplishmen t report (Every Quarter) • Letter Request

24. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators Number of school heads and teachers provided with TA on action research and curriculum innovations across subject areas/grade levels Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total • • • Has provided technical assistance in the conduct of basic and/or action research on curriculum management and instructional supervision 12/12 school heads and atleast 1 or 2 teachers per school provided TA on Action Research across areas/grade levels 12/12 school heads and atleast 1 or 2 teachers per school provided TA on Action Research across areas/grade levels 12/12 school heads and atleast 1 or 2 teachers per school provided TA on Action Research across areas/grade levels 12/12 school heads and atleast 1 or 2 teachers per school provided TA on Action Research across areas/grade levels Reviewed endorsed the Proposed and Completed Basic and/or Action Research and curriculum innovations SIM, IMs as part of TA (Depends on the submitted) 12/12 school heads and atleast 1 or 2 teachers per school provided TA on Action Research across areas/grade levels 2 Actions Research, 12 REAP reviewed and endorsed at division office. 2 Actions Research, 12 REAP reviewed and endorsed at division office. • Has conducted at least one (1) action research/ REAP/JEL for a year based on academic and nonacademic factors affecting teaming progress with 100% implementation of the intervention 2 Actions Research, 12 REAP reviewed and endorsed at division office. • Number of Action Research/ REAP/ JEL reviewed/ conducted/ endorsed at the SDO 2 Actions Research, 12 REAP reviewed and endorsed at division office. 2 Actions Research, 12 REAP reviewed and endorsed at division office.

25. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators Operational document tracking system Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total • • • Has established and maintained systems and processes geared towards administrative effectiveness and efficiency Document Tracking System District has operational document tracking system District has operational document tracking system District has operational document tracking system District has operational document tracking system District has operational document tracking system • • Financial Reports/Acco mplishment Report Number of pertinent forms and documents accomplished and stamped received on time by the appropriate offices All pertinent forms and documents accomplished and stamped received on time by the appropriate offices. All pertinent forms and documents accomplished and stamped received on time by the appropriate offices. All pertinent forms and documents accomplished and stamped received on time by the appropriate offices. All pertinent forms and documents accomplished and stamped received on time by the appropriate offices. All pertinent forms and documents accomplished and stamped received on time by the appropriate offices. • Reports on the MOOE liquidation Reviewed • Has guided the school heads in the submission of accurate financial liquidation report • Number of schools MOOE liquidation reviewed All MOOE liquidation from 12 schools were reviewed All MOOE liquidation from 12 schools were reviewed All MOOE liquidation from 12 schools were reviewed All MOOE liquidation from 12 schools were reviewed All MOOE liquidation from 12 schools were reviewed

26. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Objectives Outputs Output Indicators • Number of recognition initiatives conducted in the district Jan-Mar April-June July- Sept Oct-Dec Total • Has promote d a culture of excellenc e, innovatio n, and collabora tion • List of teachers given recognition in the district More or least 5 recognition initiate and conducted by district- Recognition as winners or service rendered from different competition like Scilympics, Math Festival, GAD Training, PRAISE. More or least 5 recognition initiate and conducted by district- Recognition as winners from different competition like Scilympics, Math Festival, GAD Training, PRAISE. More or least 5 recognition initiate and conducted by district- Recognition as winners from different competition like Scilympics, Math Festival, GAD Training, PRAISE. More or least 5 recognition initiate and conducted by district- Recognition as winners from different competition like Scilympics, Math Festival, GAD Training, PRAISE. More or least 5 recognition initiate and conducted by district- Recognition as winners from different competition like Scilympics, Math Festival, GAD Training, PRAISE.

27. To lead people, walk beside them. As for the best leaders, the people do not notice their existence … When the best leader’s work is done, the people say, ‘We did it ourselves!’ – Lao Tsu, Chinese philosopher