1 / 38

Lecture 16: Institutional Investing

Lecture 16: Institutional Investing. Migration of Capital: Main Street to Wall Street. Trend over decades has been to greater institutional investing, and volume of trade on stock market now dominated by it.

Mercy
Télécharger la présentation

Lecture 16: Institutional Investing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lecture 16: Institutional Investing

  2. Migration of Capital:Main Street to Wall Street • Trend over decades has been to greater institutional investing, and volume of trade on stock market now dominated by it. • Increasing tendency for institutions to participate in corporate governance, solving the control problem referred to by Berle and Means. • An epic shift of power in our society towards Wall Street.

  3. Financial Assets of US Households 2000-III in $Billions • Pension funds $10348 • Corporate equities $7447 • Equity in noncorporate business $4848 • Deposits $4456 • Mutual funds $3274 • Personal trusts $1124 • Life insurance $821 • Corporate & foreign bonds & other $2887 • Total $35205

  4. Private Pension Funds’ Assets2000-III in $Billions • Corporate equities $2451 • Mutual fund shares $918 • Assets held at insurance companies (GICs, variable annuities etc.) $506 • US Government securities $457 • Corp & foreign bonds $287 • Other $511 • Total $5129

  5. State & Local Employees’ Retirement Funds 2000-III in $B • Corporate equities $1953 • US government securities $383 • Corporate & foreign bonds $324 • Other $324 • Total $3054

  6. Commercial Banks’Assets 2000-III in $billions • Loans $3803 • US Government Securities $913 • Vault cash $35 • Reserves at Federal Reserve $17 • Corporate equities $12 • Other • Total $6344

  7. S&Ls’ & Savings Banks’ Assets 2000-III in $billions • Mortgages $722 • US Government securities $148 • Equities $24 • Reserves at Federal Reserve $1 • Other $308 • Total $1203

  8. Credit Unions’ Assets2000-III in $billions • Consumer credit $181 • Home mortgages $125 • US Government securities $75 • Other $54 • Total $435

  9. Mutual Funds • Corporate equities $3622 • US Government securities $393 • Corporate & foreign bonds $368 • Municipal securities $228 • Other $205 • Total $4816

  10. Mutual Fund History • In 1920s, many investment companies bilked small investors • Massachusetts Investment Trust (MIT) in 1920s had only one class of investors, published portfolio, redeemed on demand • Became model for mutual fund industry • Investment Company Institute

  11. Structure of Mutual Fund • Assets of mutual fund are held in common • Purchases and redemptions are made at prices as of 4pm market close on that day • Other people’s purchases and redemptions affect you

  12. Recent Mutual Fund Scandals • Late trading: mutual funds accept orders at 4pm prices even though orders were made after 4pm • Market timing: mutual fund investors wait until almost 4pm to buy in or redeem their shares in foreign funds, such as Japan fund.

  13. ETFs vs. Mutual Funds • First Exchange Trade Fund: Standard & Poors Depositary Receipts (SPDRs, Spiders), AMEX 1993 • SPDRs hold portfolio of S&P index • Management fee: 12 basis points • Automatic creation and redemption • QQQs, I-Shares • Macro securities are analogous to ETFs, but are based on an index. (AMEX). Macro Securities Research LLC, Macro Financial LLC

  14. Bank Personal Trusts & EstatesAssets 2000-III in $Billions • Mutual funds $418 • Corporate Equities $358 • US Government securities $67 • Money Market $56 • Other $198 • Total $1097

  15. Trusts Not Always Institutional • Common law countries allow individuals to appoint friends as trustees. • Spendthrift trust increasingly common form of inheritance. Planning for divorces decades hence.

  16. Life Insurance Companies’ Assets 2000-III $Billions • Credit market instruments (bonds, corp & gov’t, mortgages, policy loans) $1928 • Corporate equities $1028 • Other $44 • Total $3000

  17. Rest of World Assets in US2000-III in $Billions • US Government securities $1703 • US corporate equities $1691 • Foreign & direct investments $1310 • US Corporate bonds $953 • Other $1320 • Total $6977

  18. Pension Funds • First pension funds in world: late 19th Century. • Retirement was not invented until then. • Increase in life expectancy in 20th Century brought large numbers of elderly people for first time in human history.

  19. Milestones in US Pension History • 1875 American Express Co. (then a shipping co.) establishes first US corporate pension plan: for employees who worked there 20 years, passed age 60, and were disabled, 50% of average of last ten years’ pay. Few employees qualified.

  20. Carnegie Steel Pension 1901 • First large industrial pension fund • Andrew Carnegie: The Gospel of Wealth, Carnegie Institute of Technology, Carnegie Endowment for Peace • By 1929, 329 industrial firms had pension plans, and these covered 10% of labor force. • Pension benefits were not a contractual right.

  21. Union Pension Funds • Patternmakers 1900 • Granitecutters & Cigarmakers 1905 • Locomotive Engineers 1912 was first to to grant contractual right to pension

  22. Collapse of Pensions after 1929 • Plans almost all unfunded, benefits paid out of profits now nonexistent. With Great Depression, benefits were cut sharply. Those funded were often invested in company stock. • Union plans failed disastrously, leading to their near extinction • Failures were impetus to Social Security Act of 1935.

  23. Why Were Early Pension Plans So Badly Designed? • Pension benefits not yet perceived as a right or standard • Plans were viewed as incentive for long-term company loyalty, which few achieved. • Reflects general slowness for financial innovation.

  24. General Motors Pension Plan 1950 • In labor negotiations, GM Chairman Charles Wilson proposed fully funded plan managed by financial professionals. • Proposed investing in the stock market, rather than fixed incomes, but no more than 5% in any one stock. Diversification. • Wilson made stunning proposal that funding not be invested in GM stock.

  25. Studebaker Pension Default, 1963 • UAW accused of acquiescing in underfunding of pension plan so that it could obtain a false “victory” in prior negotiations with management. • After default, UAW negotiated full benefits for senior workers, little or nothing for others. • Scandal led to Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) 1974.

  26. Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) 1974 • Act was in response to abuses in earlier defined benefit pensions • Prohibits pay-as-you-go pension plans, defined benefit plans must be fully funded. • Funds must be adequate:sound actuarial principles. • Created Pension Benefits Guarantee Corp. • Prudent person standard for managers • Minimum vesting standards. An employee for ten years has complete vesting

  27. Prudent Person Rule • ERISA: Investments must be made with “the care, skill prudence and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent man acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims.”

  28. Problems with Prudent Person Rule • Legislates conventional wisdom. • Decisions cannot be based on individual judgment.

  29. Pension Funds Types • Defined Benefit: Traditional, old-line manufacturing, supported by labor unions. Now in decline. Not usually indexed. • Defined Contribution: Employee contributes to own account. 401(k) plans begun in 1981 in US. • In defined contribution, individuals choose allocations across broad asset classes.

  30. O’Barr & Conley Study • O’Barr & Conley (Fortune & Folly, 1992) “questions [about pension strategy] elicited lengthy narratives about such cultural issues as history, politics, and relationships, but little talk about economics or finance.” (p. 75) • Fund executives “rarely rise above their personal perspectives to articulate a corporate vision.” “too busy living through an event to stop and analyze it.” (p. 76)

  31. O’Barr & Conley Cont. • Creation myths prominent. The great founder • Displacing responsibility. • Outside managers used to shift possible blame. • Blaming the law

  32. Nonprofit Organizations • Non distribution constraint. Effectively, there are no owners. Tax exempt. Board of trustees appoints own successors. • 900,000 tax-exempt nonprofits in the US • 120,000 non-profit charities in the UK • Many other countries • Nonprofits contribute 4% of US national income

  33. Economics of Nonprofits • Donations are usually only a minor source of income. • Nonprofit hospitals compete alongside for-profit hospitals, look similar.

  34. Endowments and Foundations • Not completely tax free • Grantmaking foundations must give away 5% of wealth each year, or else lose tax-exempt status. (Does not apply to operating foundations.) • Two-tier excise tax on income, 1% if they maintain or increase giving, 2% otherwise.

  35. Fragility & Importance of University Endowments • Yale University and Eagle Bank 1825 Yale lost virtually its entire endowment in this bank. • Boston University John Silber and Seragen $90 million in one company, lost 90%. • University of Bridgeport & Reverend Sung Myung Moon Unification Church 1992

  36. Yale University’s Independence • Yale initially supported by Colony of Connecticut. Yale mostly supported by CT • 1755 CT refused annual grant to Yale over religious controversy. • 1792 CT made legislators fellows of Yale Corporation. Elected officials govern Yale • 1871 CT terminates all support for Yale

  37. Endowment Investing Strategy Differences • Endowments have very long-term focus, so can invest in illiquid assets • No risk of clients pulling money after poor performance • Endowments can earn liquidity premium • University endowments have higher purpose, can generate loyal support.

  38. “Illiquidity’s Attractions” (Swensen) • Less info available on illiquid assets, so universities better able to find nuggets. • High market cap stocks are too well known. Microsoft mentioned 19,899 times in 1998 in the Wall Street Journal alone. • Illiquid investments accord with “value investing,” which is inherently a long-term strategy

More Related