1 / 8

POS 339/439: 09/20/2010

POS 339/439: 09/20/2010. Website. http://faculty.roosevelt.edu/erickson/courses/pos339-439/ Course status: Presentation selection – make sure you get them in. Paper Assignment 1 due 9/29. Course agenda. Discussion of concepts introduced by readings.

Philip
Télécharger la présentation

POS 339/439: 09/20/2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. POS 339/439: 09/20/2010 • Website. • http://faculty.roosevelt.edu/erickson/courses/pos339-439/ • Course status: • Presentation selection – make sure you get them in. • Paper Assignment 1 due 9/29. • Course agenda. • Discussion of concepts introduced by readings. • Martin Chapter 4: Terror from Above State Terrorism. • Opening Viewpoint: State Terrorism as Domestic Policy in Central America. • Contras in Nicaragua. • Battalion 3-16 in Honduras. • ORDEN in El Salvador. • Guatemala – Plan Victoria 82. • State Terrorism in Middle East – Libya bombings and PFLP and Abu Nidal. • Sudan and Syria.

  2. POS 339/439: 09/20/2010 • Terrorism as foreign policy and terrorism as domestic policy. • Political violence by the stat is the most organized and far reaching application of terrorist violence. • Many resources available to the state exceeds extent of other types of terrorism. • Why do governments use terrorism as an instrument of policy? • Internationally state defines interests in a number of ways – states can choose to behave unilaterally or cooperatively, cautiously or aggressively. • Domestically – state’s interests involve the need to maintain internal security and order. • States choose from a range of overt and covert options. • Terrorism by states is characterized by official government support for political violence, repression, and intimidation. • State terrorism conducted by personnel and unofficial agents used and encouraged by the state. • Invasion of East Timor by Indonesia as an example of state terrorism.

  3. POS 339/439: 09/20/2010 . State as Terrorist: A State Terrorism Paradigm. • Models of State Terrorism. • Sponsors of terrorism. • Enablers of terrorism. • Cooperators in counterterrorism. • State terrorism incorporates many types of violence. • Warfare. • Genocide. • Assassinations. • Torture. • Understanding State Sponsored Terrorism. • Patrice Lumumba People’s Friendship University. • Usually covert secret policy. • State patronage for terrorism. • State assistance for terrorism. • State Sponsorship: The Patronage Model. • Patronage in Foreign Policy Domain.

  4. POS 339/439: 09/20/2010 • US support for Contras state patronage model. • Patronage in Domestic Policy. • Rationalization. • Suppress clear and present danger to national security. • Maintain law and order during times of national crisis. • Protect fundamental cultural values that are threatened by subversives. • Restore stability to government institutions. • State Sponsorship: The Assistance Model. • Assistance in the foreign policy domain. • Support for politically violent proxy operating beyond its borders. • Plausible deniability built into the relationship between state and proxy. • Deny the link exists; admit link exists but product of rogue operation; admit or deny link but label as freedom fighters; blame movements adversary for creating environment of violence.

  5. POS 339/439: 09/20/2010 • Assistance in Domestic Policy Domain. • Blame adversary for breakdown in order and call on people to assist government in restoring order. • Proxy violence is evidence of popular support. • Call on parties to cease hostilities but blame violence on adversary. • Assure everyone that government is seeking to restore order but regime is unable to immediately end violence. • Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution as example. • Violence Abroad: State Terrorism as Foreign Policy. • Latter half of 20th century many states used terrorism as foreign policy. • Advantages of state terrorism in foreign domain. • State terrorism is inexpensive. • State terrorism has limited consequences. • State terrorism can be effective.

  6. POS 339/439: 09/20/2010 • Range of state terrorism as foreign policy. • Ideological support. • Financial support. • Military support. • Operational support. • Initiating terrorist attacks. • Direct involvement in terrorist attacks. • Moral Support: Politically Sympathetic Sponsorship. • Example: Iran support for Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and Hamas. • Technical Support. • Logistically supportive sponsorship – government provides aid and comfort to championed cause. • Example: Syrian support for Amal and Hezbollah. • Selective Participation. • Episode specific sponsorship.

  7. POS 339/439: 09/20/2010 • Active Participation: Joint Operations. • Phoenix Program: American and Vietnamese cooperation against Viet Cong. • Violence At Home: State Terrorism as Domestic Policy. • Paramilitaries and Death Squads. • Apartheid. • Legitimizing State Authority. • State Domestic Authority. • Unofficial repression. • Repression as policy. • Mass repression: Genocidal state terrorism. • Unofficial Repression: Vigilante Domestic State Terrorism. • Repression as Policy: Official Domestic State Terrorism. • Chapter Perspective 4.3. • Social Cleansing. • Ethnic Cleansing.

  8. POS 339/439: 09/20/2010 • Mass Repression: Genocidal Domestic State Terrorism. • Chapter Perspective 4.4 Anfal Campaign Domestic State Terrorism in Iraq. • Death Squads in Latin America. • Problem of Accountability: Monitoring State Terrorism.

More Related