1 / 26

III. THE BARRIERS TO MEDIEVAL ECONOMIC GROWTH: FEUDAL AGRARIAN SOCIETY

III. THE BARRIERS TO MEDIEVAL ECONOMIC GROWTH: FEUDAL AGRARIAN SOCIETY A. Western European Feudalism in its medieval agrarian context Importance of Agriculture and Agrarian Socio-Political Institutions

Renfred
Télécharger la présentation

III. THE BARRIERS TO MEDIEVAL ECONOMIC GROWTH: FEUDAL AGRARIAN SOCIETY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. III. THE BARRIERS TO MEDIEVAL ECONOMIC GROWTH: FEUDAL AGRARIAN SOCIETY A. Western European Feudalism in its medieval agrarian context

  2. Importance of Agriculture and Agrarian Socio-Political Institutions • (1) Agriculture: the overwhelmingly dominant sector of the medieval and early-modern European economies (outside of Italy and the Low Countries): employed 90% of population • (2) Reflects very low productivity of agriculture and the medieval economy in general: so that most people tied to the land to earn subsistence • (3) Low productivity of land, labour, and capital: but especially the first two factors

  3. Feudalism as an Agrarian Institution • (1) All medieval feudal institutions were agrarian institutions: • (2) The tri-partite nature of Feudalism • -Feudalism itself: hierarchic military form of government, composed of military aristocrats • - Manorialism: the economic superstructure of feudalism: a landed estate granted to a feudal lord for his maintenance (including retinue) • Serfdom: a system of subservient, depenent peasant cultivation, on manorial estates, to work for the benefit of the feudal landed lord. • (3) The medieval Church: also a feudal agrarian institution: but I will leave the role of the Church to a later topic (on Banking) • (4) All of these institutions are important for us as barriers to change, to innovation, to economic growth: and thus barriers to rising productivity: to free land, resources, labour for better uses

  4. Feudalism: Hierarchic System of Military Government • (1) Feudalism: as a socio-political military system of government • - militaristic system of government originally designed to provide defence and protection at the local level in absence of central authority • From the decline of the Roman Empire in the West: and with the Germanic invasions • (2) Hierarchic-Pyramidal system of service and dependence: with kings or emperor at the top, served by a military aristocracy, who in turn ruled and were supported by a servile peasantry.

  5. Military Nature of Feudalism (1) EQUATION: a feudal noble (aristocrat: by blood inheritance) = a knight = cavalry horse-soldier (mounted shock combat troops) = a feudal vassal or servant serving a superior military lord (barons, counts, dukes, kings) (2) Connection with manorialism: The feudal noble = feudal vassal (servant) receives and holds a landed fief in payment for his military services (3) Feudal fief = manorial estates (one or more manors), worked by a dependent (servile ) peasantry: i.e., the feudal fief serves to support the knight (servant, vassal) and his military retinue: feodum = fee

  6. Knighthood as a costly profession • (1) The feudal aristocracy as a military class of cavalry horse-soldier – i.e., knights (chevaliers) • With the full development of the cavalry, by the 8th century, knights enjoyed almost unchallenged military supremacy: with both the military and economic power to be the paramount ruling class • (2) Very high-cost military profession • - full-time profession (allowing no other) with very costly, time-consuming training • Very costly capital equipment: specially bred war horses, costly, heavy armour, costly saddles and stirrups, and a retinue of military servants • ca.1300 – equipment of English knight = value of 20 oxen = plough teams of 10 peasant families • (3) Infantry: part-time peasant foot-soldiers; not costly

  7. Medieval knight: horse & armour

  8. Historical Evolution of Feudalism, 5th – 9th centuries • From the decline of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century CE to the collapse of the Carolingian Empire in the 9th-10th centuries • From even earlier, 4th century, Germanic invasions ended Roman rule in Gaul by 5th century: Frankish leader Clovis became king in 466 • Merovingian era (511-752): failed to provide law, order, and security in Frankish kingdoms, beset with civil wars, when kingdoms divided by inheritance • Carolingian era: 752 – 987 • Charles ‘the Hammer’ Martel: defeated Arabs at Poitiers-Tours in 732: his son Pepin III became first Carolingian king: in 752 • Charlemagne (Carolus Magnus): Emperor 800 – 814 • On death of his son Louis the Pious in 840: Empire divided into three kingdoms (Treaty of Verdun 843) • The Carolingian-Frankish Empire then beset with civil wars and three-pronged invasions : from Arabs (Berbers), Norsemen (Danes, Norwegians), and Magyars (Hungarians)

  9. The Justinian Empire (527-65 CE)

  10. The Carolingian Empire, 752 - 987

  11. Division of the Empire: Verdun 843

  12. Carolingian Feudalism • With such widespread insecurity and the absence of any military and judicial power from Merovingian and Carolingian kings, landed lords with their own military and judicial powers provided protection and security at the local level: if not from invaders, other rapacious lords • Absorbed free peasant communities into their lordships: offering ‘protection’ (Mafia style) • Formerly free peasants became serfs: manorialism

  13. Technological innovations in the rise of the Frankish Cavalry • THE STIRRUP: The Lynn White thesis: much disputed • The introduction of the stirrup: from Asia (7th century, or earlier) into Europe and the Islamic world • By the 8th century, in widespread use in Frankish kingdoms – but also used by Muslim armies (Battle of Tours, 732) • The metal and leather stirrup attached to the saddle allowed the mounted soldiers to fight on horseback, rather than having to dismount to fight • made the cavalry -- as mounted combat shock troops – almost invincible (until the early 14th century) • Opponents of White: Bacharach (1970), De Vries (1992) • IRON HORSE SHOES (U –shaped): also very important: from the 8th or 9th centuries: in protecting the horses’ hooves

  14. The Stirrup

  15. The Spread of Carolingian Feudalismin the 9th & 10th centuries • (1) Heartland of Carolingian Feudalism: between the Loire river (France) and the Rhine river (Germany) • (2) Carolingian feudalism spread eastwards, into Germany, Central Europe, Scandinavia • (3) Westward: into England, with the Norman Conquest of 1066 • (4) Southward: southern France, Italy, Spain: - - but never spread effectively south of Loire river: • Because Roman Law, Roman institutions, and urban civilization remained much stronger there • But also because Mediterranean agriculture was far less suited to raising horses than northern agriculture

  16. Norman Europe, ca. 1100

  17. Challenges to Feudalism by 1300 • (1) Growing powers of national monarchies: especially in France and England, whose kings raised their own national, non-feudal armies • But English kings enjoyed major advantage: their kingdom was not subdivided into feudal principalities: i.e., duchies and counties ruled locally by feudal princes • (2) Growing threat of mercantile towns and urban bourgeoisie: who financed kings, and lent them administrative support (though some became nobles) • (3) Military Innovations: • - new infantry formations: pikes fixed in the ground (1297-1314) • - Genoese cross-bows and English long-bows • - Artillery: iron and bronze cannons from the 1330s; • - hand-held firearms: muskets and pistols

  18. Feudalism: Impediments to Economic Growth (1) • (1) Feudal-manorial estates and their labour supplies: not really subject to laws of the market economy: impeded market economy • - note that manors as fiefs were given as rewards and payment for military service: and thus could not legally be alienated (i.e., sold) • (2) Control over and predominance (with the Church) in landed wealth: with a disproportionate share of national income • (3) Adversely skewed effect on aggregate demand- biased the market demand towards the production and distribution of high-valued luxury goods • (4) Hostility of both nobility and the Church to mercantile bourgeoisie: social and religious hostility undermined social respectability of capitalism • (5 ) Not predisposed to invest their wealth productivity as capital in the market economy • - indeed in many parts of Europe (England and Prussia excepted), the nobility were liable to ‘derogation’ and loss of status and influence if they engaged in profit-seeking mercantile pursuits

  19. Feudalism: Impediments to Economic Growth (2) • Political fragmentation meant market & economic fragmentation: • FRANCE: • -- even though most feudal dynasties ruling duchies & counties died out by 16th century, the feudal principalities remained -- France did not become united until French Revolution of 1789 • GERMANY: not united until 1871 ( 2nd German Empire) • ITALY: not united until 1870 • SPAIN: separate kingdoms of Castile & Aragon (from 1492): not united until Napoleonic wars • ENGLAND: the one major exception: England became a fully united kingdom, with national legal, judicial institutions from reign of Henry II (1154-1189) • MARKET FRAGMENTATION: before national unification, with internal tariffs, tolls, local measures, and other barriers to trade

More Related