1 / 48

Next Month

Next Month. Live Conference is on FRIDAY June 5 Millard Fillmore Gates/Suburban will replay session for Monday Grand Rounds Meg Campbell, PhD, RN Recognizing patients who can benefit from palliative care consultation. CME Disclosure. NO commercial relationships of any kind

Renfred
Télécharger la présentation

Next Month

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Next Month • Live Conference is on FRIDAY June 5 • Millard Fillmore Gates/Suburban will replay session for Monday Grand Rounds Meg Campbell, PhD, RN Recognizing patients who can benefit from palliative care consultation

  2. CME Disclosure • NO commercial relationships of any kind • Some off-label uses may be discussed—they will be identified as such

  3. Managing Death:Diagnosing Dying,Setting Goals Jack P. Freer, MD Professor of Medicine University at Buffalo

  4. Learning Objectives • Be able to recognize the dying patient in institutional settings

  5. Learning Objectives • Be able to recognize the dying patient in institutional settings • Help clarify and prioritize the goals of care most relevant to the dying patient

  6. Learning Objectives • Be able to recognize the dying patient in institutional settings • Help clarify and prioritize the goals of care most relevant to the dying patient • avoid burdensome diagnostic and therapeutic modalities that are unlikely to further the goals of care

  7. Learning Objectives • Be able to recognize the dying patient in institutional settings • Help clarify and prioritize the goals of care most relevant to the dying patient • avoid burdensome diagnostic and therapeutic modalities that are unlikely to further the goals of care • Help family and staff understand clinical signs and symptoms that are likely to occur

  8. Learning Objectives • Be able to recognize the dying patient in institutional settings

  9. Diagnosing “Dying” Some patients are clearly dying • They die, no matter how intensely we try to prevent death. • They die, no matter how superb the medical care they receive. • If we “successfully treat” one potential cause of death, they still “die of something else.”

  10. Diagnosing “Dying” Dying patients may be maddeningly difficult to distinguish from those who are simply sick. • Frail old people sometimes get pneumonia or an MI. • High quality medical care sometimes restores them to baseline.

  11. Diagnosing “Dying” More often than not, modern medicine treats dying patients like they are simply sick. • Fits with our forensic reductionist medical model (people die of something). • In uncertain situations, we avoid the path that will cause us the most chagrin.

  12. Chagrin Factor Feinstein AR. The 'chagrin factor' and qualitative decision analysis. Archives of Internal Medicine. 145(7):1257-9, 1985 Jul. • Medical decisions produce specific results • Each “wrong result” follows from a particular decision “...a customary clinical strategy is to choose the option whose wrong result will cause the least chagrin.”

  13. Prognosticating in Cancer Patient • Advanced metastatic cancer is fatal • Trajectory is predictable • Performance predicts survival

  14. Karnofsky Performance Status

  15. Prognosticating in CHF/COPD • Diseases are potentially fatal • Trajectory is less predictable • Treatment decisions have significant effect (ventilator)

  16. Prognosticating in Dementia, Frailty • Alzheimer’s is fatal (not widely recognized) • Trajectory is very unpredictable • Treatment decisions have significant effect (PEG)

  17. Learning Objectives • Be able to recognize the dying patient in institutional settings • Help clarify and prioritize the goals of care most relevant to the dying patient • avoid burdensome diagnostic and therapeutic modalities that are unlikely to further the goals of care • Help family and staff understand clinical signs and symptoms that are likely to occur

  18. Goals of Care? • Complete cure

  19. Goals of Care? • Complete cure • Longevity/survival

  20. Goals of Care? • Complete cure • Longevity/survival • Comfort/avoidsuffering

  21. Goals of Care? • Complete cure • Longevity/survival • Comfort/avoidsuffering • Independence

  22. Goals of Care? • Complete cure • Longevity/survival • Comfort/avoidsuffering • Independence • Remain in familiar environment

  23. Goals of Care? • Complete cure • Longevity/survival • Comfort/avoidsuffering • Independence • Remain in familiar environment • …

  24. Goals of Care • Goals not explicitly articulated • Single goal often presumed • Failure to attain that goal devastating

  25. Goals of Care • Multiple goals • Goals differ in priority • Goals differ in attainability • Goals conflict with each other • Dynamic—changes with time

  26. Goals of Care? • Complete cure • Longevity/survival • Comfort/avoidsuffering • Independence • Remain in familiar environment • …

  27. Goals of Care? • Longevity/survival • Comfort/avoidsuffering • Remain in familiar environment

  28. Goals of Care? • Longevity/survival • Comfort/avoidsuffering

  29. Goals of Care? • Comfort/avoidsuffering • Remain in familiar environment

  30. Learning Objectives • Be able to recognize the dying patient in institutional settings • Help clarify and prioritize the goals of care most relevant to the dying patient • avoid burdensome diagnostic and therapeutic modalities that are unlikely to further the goals of care • Help family and staff understand clinical signs and symptoms that are likely to occur

  31. “Futility” vs. Goals of Care • Aggressive treatments in dying patients sometimes discounted as “futile” • Futility really means totally ineffective

  32. “Futility” vs. Goals of Care • Real reason: the treatment is incapable of furthering any realistic goals of care • Dialysis, ventilator, PEG tubes etc • Diagnostic tests: scans, biopsies, blood tests • Vital signs, pulse oximetry

  33. Learning Objectives • Be able to recognize the dying patient in institutional settings • Help clarify and prioritize the goals of care most relevant to the dying patient • avoid burdensome diagnostic and therapeutic modalities that are unlikely to further the goals of care • Help family and staff understand clinical signs and symptoms that are likely to occur

  34. Death in Days—Weeks • Bedridden • Profound weakness • Little interest in food / drink • Difficulty swallowing • Increasingly somnolent Palliative Medicine, Declan Walsh, MD, Ed. 2009 by Saunders/Elsevier

  35. Death in Hours—Days • Cold skin • Clammy skin • Cyanosis of extremities / mouth • Decreased urine output • Diminished level of consciousness Palliative Medicine, Declan Walsh, MD, Ed. 2009 by Saunders/Elsevier

  36. Death in Hours—Days • Breathing may “rattle” • Respiration: irregular / shallow / Cheyne-Stokes • Waxen face • Relaxed facial muscles • Prominent nose Palliative Medicine, Declan Walsh, MD, Ed. 2009 by Saunders/Elsevier

  37. Summary • Diagnose Dying • Clarify and Prioritize Goals • Start Early • Engage Patient & Family • Review, Revise, Discuss • Trust the Process • Communication: Start with Positive Treatments (not “Do Not….”) • Location, Location, Location

More Related