Download
aquatic and terrestrial plant species with potential to remove heavy metals from stormwater n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Aquatic and Terrestrial Plant Species with Potential to Remove Heavy Metals from Stormwater PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Aquatic and Terrestrial Plant Species with Potential to Remove Heavy Metals from Stormwater

Aquatic and Terrestrial Plant Species with Potential to Remove Heavy Metals from Stormwater

515 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

Aquatic and Terrestrial Plant Species with Potential to Remove Heavy Metals from Stormwater

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Aquatic and Terrestrial Plant Species with Potential to Remove Heavy Metals from Stormwater By: Asa Fritioff & Maria Greger Department of Botany Stockholm University Source: International Journal of Phytoremediation Date Published: May 3rd, 2003 Presenter: Gianna Grabowski

  2. Thesis & Importance of Article • Percolation systems or wetlands contain plant species that are capable of phtyoremediating stormwater contaminated with heavy metals. • The most toxic metals commonly found in stormwater were used in this study, including cadmium, copper, zinc, and lead.

  3. Important Terms • Stormwater= is where impervious surfaces, such as roads and roofs, drain rain and snow melt water. It is mostly contaminated by organic pollutants, oil, and heavy metals, • Phytoremediation= is a process where contamination is either stabilized, eliminated, removed, or destroyed by plants.

  4. Background • Heavy metal concentrations are usually greater in stormwater than in naturally occurring waters. • Wetland/percolation area treatment of stormwater is preferable over other methods. • Contaminated areas contain a variety of plant species with differing capabilities for heavy metal remediation.

  5. Background Continued • Terrestrial and emergent plant species exist in percolation areas. • Free-floating, submerged, and emergent plants occur in wetlands. • The most effective metal remediating plants were needed for this study. • To determine this, a metal concentration analysis was done on the most common plants found in the study area.

  6. Methods- Field Study • Three sampling areas were used for the field experiment, labeled Areas 1, 2, and 3. • They were all located 7-15 km south of Stockholm, Sweden. • Plants and soil samples were taken from all 3 areas on the same day. • Plant samples were collected from the most abundant species in the 3 areas, such as P. natans (submersed), L. gibba (free-floating), A. plantago-aquatica (emergent), and F. ulmaria (terrestrial). • Plant samples were divided into root and shoot sections. • 12 species total were used in this study.

  7. Plant Species Used in This Study

  8. Methods- Controlled Study • The plant species F. ulmaria, P. natans, and A. plantago-aquatica were used in this experiment. • A heavy metal mixture was added to half of the plant samples, the others were left as controls. • All plants were cleaned with water. • A flame absorption spectrophotometer determined the metal concentrations. • ANOVA was used to statistically analyze the data.

  9. Results • Zinc concentrations in plants were between 16-451µg 1/g DW. • Copper concentrations in plants were between 2.7-94 µg 1/g DW • Cadmium concentrations in plants were between 04-48 µg -1 DW • Lead concentrations in plants were between 30-26 µg 1/g DW

  10. Zinc Conc. (µg 1/g DW) in Plants and Soil During Field Test

  11. Conc. of Metals in Plants During Controlled Experiment

  12. Discussion • The submersed plant species removed more metal contaminants (e.g. P. natans). • The three areas showed that different plant species contain various levels of metal concentrations. • The plants showed an ability to intake more contaminants at higher metal concentration periods. (e.g. heavy rains). • The majority of the terrestrial and aquatic plants used in this study were effective at removing heavy metal contamination from stormwater.

  13. Critique • Good and important study. • Needed more plant species in the controlled study. • Lack of data from other types of stormwater contamination studies. • Plant and soil collection occurred on only 1 day in both the field and controlled experiments.

  14. Contact Information • For more information please contact: Gianna M. Grabowski (586) 773-0723 gg_galaxy2002@yahoo.com • Questions???