1 / 6

JAR-OPS 0, 2 & 4

JAR-OPS 0, 2 & 4. David Beaven AWGAS. NPA OPS 33. A-NPA distributed in April 2003 4 months comment period 118 general comments, 366 specific AWGAS/HSC distilled into 24 action items Task groups allocated to develop revised texts. DRAFTING GROUP met 14 June 2004.

aadi
Télécharger la présentation

JAR-OPS 0, 2 & 4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. JAR-OPS 0, 2 & 4 David BeavenAWGAS

  2. NPA OPS 33 • A-NPA distributed in April 2003 • 4 months comment period • 118 general comments, 366 specific • AWGAS/HSC distilled into 24 action items • Task groups allocated to develop revised texts

  3. DRAFTING GROUP met 14 June 2004 • NAAs – France, Finland, Italy, Sweden, UK plus IBAC • Implications of NPA 2/2004 • Decided to leave aside matters that will be set by EASA - • Applicability – a/c weight, purpose of flight, third country aircraft • Quality management / Safety management

  4. ‘FROZEN’ DRAFTS • Submitted to JAA on 4 August 2004 • All changes since A-NPA marked with sidelines • Changes not exposed to committee process • IBAC dissatisfied with decision not to make changes in areas to be decided by EASA

  5. FUTURE USE OF 0, 2 & 4 • 5 years development • In general the regulations are technically sound • Many unwanted effects have been foreseen and removed by careful rewording • Some areas still to be resolved

  6. FUTURE USE OF 0, 2 & 4 • To consider – • JAR-OPS 0 is suitable for all General Aviation • Drafts are suitable to recommend to EASA for developing Implementing Rules (IR) • Sound basis for States’ national regulations in areas not subject to regulation by EASA

More Related