1 / 8

DART – Evaluation of a large scale project

DART – Evaluation of a large scale project. Matt Barnard Head of Evaluation NSPCC. Domestic Abuse Recovering Together. Theory of change Child’s recovery improved if non-abusing parent involved Mother/child relationship may need strengthening Aims Rebuild mother/child relationship

abdalla
Télécharger la présentation

DART – Evaluation of a large scale project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DART – Evaluation of a large scale project Matt Barnard Head of Evaluation NSPCC

  2. Domestic Abuse Recovering Together • Theory of change • Child’s recovery improved if non-abusing parent involved • Mother/child relationship may need strengthening • Aims • Rebuild mother/child relationship • Help with other aspects of recovery • Programme structure • 10 weeks long for 2-2.5 hours a week • Separate and joint sessions

  3. Evaluation Methods • Aims • Measure impact • Identify barriers and facilitators • Mixed methodology • Quasi-experimental • Standardised measures • Qualitative interviews • Surveys • Data collection • Before (T1) • Straight after (T2) • Six months after end (T3)

  4. Standardised Measures • Mothers • Parental Locus of Control scale • Parental Acceptance and Rejection Questionnaire (PARQ) • Rosenberg self esteem questionnaire • Children • Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire • PARQ (Child version) • Self esteem measure (adapted from Rosenberg)

  5. Comparison group • Comparison group • Play therapy intervention at women’s refuge • SDQ data collected before and at end of service • Limitations • Wider age range 2-11 (excluded those under 5) • Small sample (19 after exclusions) • Numbers of sessions (mean =15, DART = 10) • DART group had higher ‘difficulties’ scores at T1

  6. Early Impact results • Outcomes improved over time • Mothers all scales • Children SDQ and some PARQ subscales • Outcomes improved more than comparison (SDQ) • Total difficulties only significant • Other scales approaching significance

  7. Early process findings • Key facilitators • Joint sessions facilitated communication • ‘Adult only’ and ‘child only’ sessions enabled peer support • Key barriers • Level of programme prescription • Difficulties in understanding language and concepts • Low levels of referrals • Distress caused by contact with perpetrators • Lack of services for onward referral

  8. Lessons • Degree of cultural change • Organisation • Individuals • Data collection logistics • Measure data • Basic demographic/ programme data • Pre-planning • Comparison group

More Related