1 / 14

Family and Kinship

Family and Kinship. Isaiah Magpali-Isaac Tatiana Hughes Tanisha Tatum. Video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WimixexiiPE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-MeRDfMvK0. Introduction. Altruism has always been a puzzle for Evolution

abdul-gaines
Télécharger la présentation

Family and Kinship

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Family and Kinship Isaiah Magpali-Isaac Tatiana Hughes Tanisha Tatum Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994) Some Neo-Darwinian Decision Rules for Altruism: Weighing Cues for Inclusive Fitness as a Function of the Biological Importance of the Decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 779.

  2. Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WimixexiiPE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-MeRDfMvK0 Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994) Some Neo-Darwinian Decision Rules for Altruism: Weighing Cues for Inclusive Fitness as a Function of the Biological Importance of the Decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 779.

  3. Introduction • Altruism has always been a puzzle for Evolution • This article hypothesizes that we have heuristics for decisions that involve altruism. • As we know natural selection favors those who are prone to help others with the same genes. • The closer the person is related to you, the more likely you are to help them.

  4. Introduction cont. • Inclusive Fitness- by helping genetic kin to survive and reproduce, your shared genes can spread. • In regards to altruism, a Heuristic evolved to help us figure out who to help, according to how closely related they are to us. • The article examines this heuristic by measuring how we perceive our relatedness to different relatives, vs. how close they are actually related to us.

  5. Background/Objectives • Background • People can discriminate between close relatives and moderately close relatives (mother vs. aunt) • Weber’s law: Differences between close kin appear greater than differences between distant kin. • Objectives • Determine the relationship between perceived and actual kinship Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994) Some Neo-Darwinian Decision Rules for Altruism: Weighing Cues for Inclusive Fitness as a Function of the Biological Importance of the Decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 779.

  6. Subjects/Procedures/Methods • Subjects • 26 undergraduates from University of Michigan • Procedures • Subjects asked to indicate how closely related the felt to kin (close to distant to fictive) • Fictive = stepparents, acquaintances • 19 Question Questionnaire • 1 for genetically identical (twins; r=1.00) • 4 for very close (mother, father, sister, etc.; r=0.50) • 6 for moderately close (aunt, uncle, grandmother, etc.; r=0.25) • 3 for distant relatives (cousin, great-grandmother, etc.; r=0.125) • 4 for fictive kin (stepparent, acquaintance; r=0.00) • Use of ANOVA and Dunne’s test to analyze data Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994) Some Neo-Darwinian Decision Rules for Altruism: Weighing Cues for Inclusive Fitness as a Function of the Biological Importance of the Decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 779.

  7. Results Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994) Some Neo-Darwinian Decision Rules for Altruism: Weighing Cues for Inclusive Fitness as a Function of the Biological Importance of the Decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 779.

  8. Results (cont.) • ANOVA indicated a significant decline in perceived relatedness with actual relatedness. • Dunne’s test demonstrates drop in perceived relatedness between each pair of adjacent points was reliable • Most precipitous declines occurred between • Very close and moderately close kin • And between distant kin and acquaintances Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994) Some Neo-Darwinian Decision Rules for Altruism: Weighing Cues for Inclusive Fitness as a Function of the Biological Importance of the Decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 779.

  9. Results (cont.) • What does mean for helping behaviors? • If our decision to help someone is based off of perceived relatedness, kinship should have greatest impact when one person is very close or unrelated. • We have heuristic thinking when it comes to inclusive fitness that says: “ Help those most closely related to you who have the greatest reproductive value” Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994) Some Neo-Darwinian Decision Rules for Altruism: Weighing Cues for Inclusive Fitness as a Function of the Biological Importance of the Decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 779.

  10. Study Strengths Use well defined hierarchy of kin closeness. Accurately measured the perceptions vs. the actual level’s of kinship. Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994) Some Neo-Darwinian Decision Rules for Altruism: Weighing Cues for Inclusive Fitness as a Function of the Biological Importance of the Decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 779.

  11. Study Weaknesses • Some people may not have any connection for distant relatives. • How close they feel towards them could be effected. • Questionnaire does not have an equal number of questions for each level of kin. • Limited number of subjects (26) Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994) Some Neo-Darwinian Decision Rules for Altruism: Weighing Cues for Inclusive Fitness as a Function of the Biological Importance of the Decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 779.

  12. Quiz • Multiple Choice • What is the r value for distant relatives as defined by the study? • A) .125 • B) .50 • C) .00 • How many levels of actual kinship were studied? • A) 3 • B) 4 • C) 5 • D) 6 • Who are you more inclined to help in dangerous situations? • A) Your Aunt • B) Your cousin • C) Your grandfather • B) Your second cousin Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994) Some Neo-Darwinian Decision Rules for Altruism: Weighing Cues for Inclusive Fitness as a Function of the Biological Importance of the Decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 779.

  13. Quiz (cont.) • True or False • The study set out to determine the relationship between perceived and actual kinship. T/F • The least abrupt declines occurred between very close kin and moderately close kin and between distant kin and acquaintances. T/F • In terms of the results, you are more likely to save your sister than you are to save your than 2 of your cousins. T/F Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994) Some Neo-Darwinian Decision Rules for Altruism: Weighing Cues for Inclusive Fitness as a Function of the Biological Importance of the Decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 779.

  14. Reference Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994) Some Neo-Darwinian Decision Rules for Altruism: Weighing Cues for Inclusive Fitness as a Function of the Biological Importance of the Decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 779. Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994) Some Neo-Darwinian Decision Rules for Altruism: Weighing Cues for Inclusive Fitness as a Function of the Biological Importance of the Decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 779.

More Related