1 / 36

Creating Public Value Through a Strong Arts Community

Creating Public Value Through a Strong Arts Community. Mark H. Moore October, 2012. Strategic Management in Government (I). Concepts Developed for Government Managers Controlled and Deployed Collectively Owned Assets of State: Tax Dollars State Authority “Public Spirt ”

abedi
Télécharger la présentation

Creating Public Value Through a Strong Arts Community

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Creating Public ValueThrough a Strong Arts Community Mark H. Moore October, 2012

  2. Strategic Management in Government (I) • Concepts Developed for Government Managers • Controlled and Deployed Collectively Owned Assets of State: • Tax Dollars • State Authority • “Public Spirt” • Accountable to “Public” For Effective, Value Creating Use • Elected Representatives • Courts • Court of Public Opinion (Interest Groups, Media) • Citizens, Taxpayers, Customers/Clients

  3. Strategic Management in Government (II) • Created at Time When Private Management Concepts Were Migrating to Public Sector • Customer Oriented Government • Performance Metrics • Pay for Performance • Big Concept from Private Sector Did Not Move: The Idea of Corporate Strategy • Managers Responsible for Positioning Organizations in Complex, Dynamic Environments • Discretion Over Ends as Well as Means • Innovativeness and Learning Key to Success

  4. Strategic Management in Government (III) • Conventional Meanings of “Strategic” • Long Run Rather than Short Run • Ends Rather than Means • Big Rather than Small • Meaning of Strategic at HBS: • Fitted to Environment • Path From Present to Future

  5. Strategic Management in Government (IV) • Environment of Private Manager: • Customers (Individuals with Desires, Money) • Competitors • Shareholders and Other Investors • Environment of Government Manager • Elected Representatives of People • Citizens and Their Aspirations • Clients of Government Organizations • Social Conditions to be Ameliorated • Partners and Collaborators in Producing Social Results

  6. Strategic Management in Government (IV) • The Market: Private Desires and Individual Consumption • Customers with Desires and Money • Investors • Competitors • The Polity: Public Aspirations and Social Conditions • Clients with Needs and Rights • Citizens/Taxpayers • Partners Private Environment Public Environment

  7. Strategic Management in Government (VI) • The Authorizing Environment • Simple v. Complex • Stable v. Dynamic • The Task Environment • Simple v. Complex • Stable v. Dynamic • How Cope?

  8. Four Key Interlinked Analytic Ideas • The Strategic Triangle : A Framework for Positioning Public Enterprises in Complex Environments • The Authorizing Environment:Sources of Legitimacy and Support for a Public Enterprise • The Task Environment: Social Conditions to Be Ameliorated by Public Action • The Public Value Chain: Building Operational Capacity to Deliver Desired Results

  9. Strategic Triangle Legitimacy & Support Public Value Operational Capabilities

  10. Functions of the Strategic Triangle • Analytic Concept Serving a Function Similar to that Served by Porter’s “Five Forces,” or McKinsey’s “Six Circles” in the Private Sector • Namely, to Help Managers Find a “Fit” Between the Environment they Face, and the Enterprise they Lead. • Need to Simplify for the Public Sector, so Got it Down to Three Circles!

  11. Functions of the Strategic Triangle • To help public managers position their enterprises in complex, dynamic environments • To focus and distribute managerial attention across their “Task Environment” and their “Authorizing Environment” • To help them envision a sustainable Public Value proposition to be pursued

  12. The “Task Environment” • Social Conditions to be Ameliorated • Substantive Problems to Be Solved • Wants to Be Satisfied • Needs to be Met • Rights to Be Vindicated • Opportunities to be Exploited

  13. Strategic Triangle Legitimacy & Support Task Environment (Social conditions to be Ameliorated) Public Value Operational Capabilities

  14. “Public Value” and the “Task Environment” • To Create Public Value is the point of all managerial activity • Public Value is created when managers transform social conditions in collectively desired directions • The “Task Environment” consists of the particular social conditions public managers seek to change • Demonstrations of Public Value creation lie in evidence showing changes in social conditions • Problem: Not everyone sees Public Value in the same way

  15. The “Authorizing Environment” Definition: Actors from whom manager formally needs authorization and resources to survive and be effective Or, those other actors who can influence the formal actors

  16. The “Authorizing Environment:”A (Westminster) Picture Prime Minister/Premier Central Agencies Courts Minister Elected Legislature Dept Head Interest Groups Public Manager Media Staff Citizens Taxpayers Clients

  17. Strategic Triangle Legitimacy & Support Authorizing Environment Public Value Operational Capabilities

  18. Assets and Capabilities Entrusted to Manager (Plus Those Required to Achieve the Desired Results That Manager Can Influence) “Operational Capacity”

  19. Process by Which Fungible Assets Like Money, Labor, Ideas, etc. Are Deployed to Produce Particular Results “The “Value Chain”

  20. The “Value Chain” Activities Processes Procedures Programs Organization C L I E N T S A T I S F A C T I O N O U T C O M E S Inputs Outputs Partners and Co-Producers

  21. Strategic Triangle Legitimacy & Support Public Value Public Value Value Chain Operational Capabilities

  22. Strategic Triangle: A Trivial Concept! Legitimacy & Support Public Value Operational Capabilities

  23. The Challenge: Touch all three bases!

  24. The Challenge: Applying to Our Situation

  25. Operational Capacity (I) • Useful to Start with Operational Capacity Sitting in the Room • Representatives of Many Different Arts Organizations, Their Sponsors and Authorizers, Their Suppliers • Each Organization has its Own Strategic Triangle • But Together You are an “Organizational Field,” or an “Industry,” or a “Community,” or an “Association,” or Perhaps a “Movement”

  26. Operational Capacity (II) • To Some Degree, You Compete with One Another Just as Firms in the Same Industry Do • But You Also Collaborate with Respect to Creating Space in Society for Industry as a Whole • Mix of Competition/Collaboration May Depend on State of Industry Development

  27. Operational Capacity (III) • As Formal Organizations, You Represent the Tip of the Iceberg of Artistic Engagement and Activity • Natural to Think That Path of Development of Industry as a Whole is to Build Audience • But Individuals Participate in Art in Three Different Capacities • Audience for Arts • Producers of Art • Sponsors of Art • Likely That These are Related to One Another • Likely That There are Tiers of These Relationships

  28. Operational Capacity (IV) • Perhaps Public Value is Being Created Not Just at the End of the Value Chain, but all Along it as Individuals Support, Produce, and View Art • And Not Only at Peak, But In Depths Artists Audience Sponsors

  29. A Broad View of the Arts

  30. Operational Capacity (V) • Build the Industry as a Self-Conscious Community or as a Movement • Target: Maximize Number of Queenslanders Engaged in Arts Activity as Sponsors, Producers or Audiences at All Levels, Across All Sectors • Special Target for Expansion (I): Children • Special Target for Expansion (II): Aging Boomers

  31. Public Value Proposition (I): Benefits to Arts Community Members • Audience: Enjoyment, Enrichment, Engagement • Artists: Enjoyment, Enrichment, Engagement • Sponsors: Enjoyment, Enrichment, Engagement

  32. Public Value Proposition (II): Economic Impact of Arts on Community • Employment Within Industry • Multiplier Effects on Supporting Services • Indirect Effects on Local Economy • Community Attractiveness/Quality of Life • Creative Class • Tax Base

  33. Public Value Proposition (IV):Creating a Social, Civic Culture • Individual Voice/Agency • The Search for Authenticity/Truthfulness • Empathy/Curiosity/Tolerane • Pleasurable/Meaningful Communal Events • Social Capital • Bonding • Bridging

  34. Sources of Legitimacy and Support • Individuals Who Want to Be Members of the Arts Community: Sponsors, Artists, Audience • Organizations Who Help Organize Participation and Activities of Arts Community • Elected Officials Who See the Public Value of an Expanded, Enriched Arts Community That Has Deeply Engaged the Community

  35. Conclusion: Creating Citizens • The Most Important Reason to Want a Strong Arts Community is that it Creates Citizens Who Participate in a Strong Civic Culture • The Most Important Source of Legitimacy and Support for the Arts Community is the Citizens Who Create and Are Created by It • The Most Important Operational Capacity of the Arts Community is the Desire and Capacity of Human Beings to Create Art

  36. A Challenge To Consider How To Take an “Organizational Field” And Turn it Into a “Community” or a “Movement” to Create Citizens Sustained by the Common Desire to Be Human

More Related