1 / 8

Jane Wellman INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON UNIVERSITY COSTS AND COMPACTS CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA

University-community partnerships for a public agenda for higher education: shifting alliances and new coalitions. Jane Wellman INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON UNIVERSITY COSTS AND COMPACTS CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA 15 JULY 2008. Opinion research increasingly used to anchor public outreach strategies.

abeni
Télécharger la présentation

Jane Wellman INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON UNIVERSITY COSTS AND COMPACTS CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. University-community partnerships for a public agenda for higher education: shifting alliances and new coalitions Jane Wellman INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON UNIVERSITY COSTS AND COMPACTS CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA 15 JULY 2008

  2. Opinion research increasingly used to anchor public outreach strategies • Longitudinal research from several sources shows consistent findings • Strongly favorable public opinion about higher education - but higher negative perceptions among opinion leaders • Widespread understanding that higher education is increasingly a necessity – not just for the few • Concern that qualified students are being denied opportunities because of high tuitions - greatest among Latino and black populations

  3. Themes from opinion research • Reach out to disadvantaged • Need for greater accountability and responsiveness • Need for greater productivity • Need for greater efficiency

  4. Growing skepticism about higher education • Worry about lack of opportunity is higher than ever • Qualified students are denied opportunity: 47% (2000)  62% (2007) • Institutions could spend less without compromising quality: 56% (2007) • Increased spending is producing more learning: 48% (2007) • Colleges care more about the ‘bottom line’ (52%) than in educating students (43%) • 2007 - 48% believe State’s higher education system needs to be completely overhauled (v. 39% in 1998) SOURCES: NCPPHE, Public Agenda

  5. Building new coalitions • Business community leadership: Business-Higher Education coalitions in place in almost every state • Linked to community-organizations in many states • Primary focus at state level on K-20 pipeline: teacher education, high school academic preparation, standards-based reform • National focus on STEM (scientific, technical, engineering, math) disciplines; R&D funding; improving graduate education

  6. Community-based coalitions to drive systemic reform • Build demand for public agenda (commissioning research and influencing opinion leaders) • Build linkages between K-12 and postsecondary – • Alignment of high school graduation with college entrance requirements • Improve teacher education • Public policy advocacy – including issues traditionally avoided by institutions (governing board appointments, tax/spending policies outside of higher education, workforce policies)

  7. Examples: • Campaign for College Opportunity (http://www.collegecampaign.org) • Virginia Business-Higher Education Council • New York Business-Higher Education Roundtable of the Capital Region • Texas Governor’s Council • Michigan “Cherry Commission” • Arizona Business & Education Commission • National Business-Higher Education Forum http://www.bhef.com/

  8. Strengths/weaknesses • Agenda defined by public rather than institutional interests: workforce development, minority student preparation, accountability, productivity, quality • Credibility from broad coalition – including community-business partnerships – but can be perceived as “insiders” in some states • Weak institutional capacity: can’t implement reforms, no regulatory or direct policy capacity • Voluntary organizations, changing leadership

More Related