1 / 31

Gravity Fed System

Gravity Fed System. Team Members: Chris Kulbago, Lauren Pahls, Ted Rakiewicz, Patrick O’Connell, Sarah Salmon, James Brinkerhoff Group Number: P13631. Table of Contents. Team Roles Project Background 3 Week Look Ahead Customer Needs Engineering Specifications Feasibility Analysis

abia
Télécharger la présentation

Gravity Fed System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Gravity Fed System Team Members: Chris Kulbago, Lauren Pahls, Ted Rakiewicz, Patrick O’Connell, Sarah Salmon, James Brinkerhoff Group Number: P13631

  2. Table of Contents • Team Roles • Project Background • 3 Week Look Ahead • Customer Needs • Engineering Specifications • Feasibility Analysis • P&ID Detailed • Cart Views • Electrical Layouts • Mounting Support • Bill of Materials • Risk Assessment • Test Plan Summary • Issues/Actions • 3 Week Fall Schedule • Questions

  3. Team Roles • Chris Kulbago- Project Manager • James Brinkerhoff- Lead Engineer • Lauren Pahls- Fluids Specialist • Sarah Salmon- Group Facilitator • Patrick O’Connell- Lead Mechanical • Ted Rakiewicz- Lead Electrical

  4. Project Background • Task Practically demonstrate process control in a lab environment using a gravity fed loop with a control valve. • Customer RIT’s Chemical Engineering Department • Product Stakeholders Students who will use the machine, the Department, Dr. Sanchez, Dr. Richter, and staff who will maintain the machine. • Collaboration Two other groups are designing similar process control machines whose aesthetic appearances must match ours.

  5. 3 Week Look Ahead

  6. Customer Needs • Machine Design Needs:An easily transportable/cleaned cart.A somewhat easy to disassemble cart.A way for students to manually manipulate flow A way for students to manipulate flow through LabVIEW.A way to manually measure flow. A way to measure flow through LabVIEW.Easily operated by 3 students.A safely operating machine.Interface of machine with LabVIEW.A way to demonstrate each part of the PID equation.A way to demonstrate noise in sensors. A way to demonstrate the time lag. Minimal use of water and electricity.

  7. Customer Needs • Student Learning Needs:A lab manual that guides students through lab in a way that engenders learning. Questions for the post lab report that test student's understanding of process control. Lab manual that focuses on PID, noise, filtration, data modeling, disturbances, and/or hysteresis.

  8. Engineering Specifications

  9. Feasibility Analysis • Line pressure confirmation • With one faucet received around 50 psi • With all faucets on decreased to about 45 psi

  10. Feasibility: Fluids Analysis • Initial Analysis using Bernoulli’s Equation • Assumptions: • Neglecting Line Losses • Calculated for when the elevated holding tank is about to be empty. • Desired flow rate = 1000 g/min. • Fluid = Water; Density = 1E6 g/m3. • Plastic Tubing with I.D. = 3/8 in. • Plane 1 = Tank Outlet and Plane 2 = Valve Inlet • Velocity @ 1 = 0 m/s, and Pressure @ 1 = Atmospheric • Height @ 2 = 0 m, and Pressure @ 2 = 40 psi = 275 kPa

  11. Feasibility: Fluids Analysis

  12. P&ID

  13. Cart Layout

  14. Cart Layout

  15. Cart Layout

  16. Electrical Layout

  17. Pressure Sensor

  18. Electrical OP Amp

  19. Electrical Pins Layout

  20. Electrical I/P Layout

  21. Micromotion Layout

  22. Mounting Support

  23. Mounting Support

  24. Bill of Materials Key notes: Budget total $1256.57 Assuming no sales tax for educational activities Will confirm Kindorf Bracketing with Paul

  25. Risk Assessment

  26. Test Plan Summary • Test flow rates • Simulate control valves in ChemCAD • Demonstrate PID control flows • LabVIEW interface functionality • Confirm ferrule ratings • Microcontroller testing • Lab maintenance update for spills

  27. Issues/Actions • Gravity fed to line fed • We initially were going to have a project that was “gravity fed,” where we had a permanent height for a gravity feed stream • Instead of this, we decided to use a second control valve and set of code in order to be able to be more versatile and mimic different heights with different water pressures from a water line • Coordinating cart purchase • We have had a slight issue coming up with a cart idea that works for the three groups. • After negotiating, we have come up with a final cart • Slow start to project • Edge was not readily available for students at the start of MSD I • The lab learning portion is in progress

  28. Cart Choice The cart of choice is a QuantumStorage Systems 32.5 inchUtility Cart The cart has a depth onthe top shelf of 17.5inches, and is composedof plastic Industrial strength cart Cart comes with 1-yearlimited warranty

  29. Next Steps • Final budget approval from Chemical Engineering Department • Purchase 3 carts, one for each group • Place purchase orders for all high lead time items • Patrick & Lauren to monitor materials received over summer • Simulate heights and create models in ChemCAD • Confirm donations from our department and Kodak • Procure and document all donations

  30. Three Week Schedule (Fall)

  31. Questions?

More Related