270 likes | 371 Vues
Explore how incorporating weblogs in academic settings can enhance pedagogy and drive student engagement. Learn about different models, practical considerations, and cautionary advice for successful implementation.
E N D
Weblogs as Academic Tools: Cases and Cautions Margaret D. Anderson Psychology Department SUNY Cortland
Academic uses Pedagogy drives technology use • tech appropriate to the task • genuine not contrived use • integrated into course grading • not overly rigid assignments
Weblogs • “weblog” – Jorn Barger – 17 Dec 1997 (Wikipedia) • Series of thematic entries – reverse chronological order • Written by one individual • Or thematic, written by many
My academic needs: • Not limited to class enrollment or semester • Customize – insert photos, links, video etc. • Determine security level • Very intuitive structure • Word limit
LiveJournal • Open source • Account levels • Multiple languages • Tec support • Change in template
1 - Traditional course Weekly journal assignments Hardcopy – problems Web based Needs: • privacy • accountability (date stamp) • interactive (post comments) • simple
Model 1 One-to-one, Two-way communication, Closed System
Closed system of personal communication between students and instructor using LiveJournal CLASS MEMBERSLIVE JOURNAL INTERFACE INSTRUCTOR
2 - Off site supervision • Student interns • Remote sites • Site supervisor(s) • Faculty supervisor • Confidentiality • Interactive • Ease • Attachments
Model 2 Multi-user, Two-way communication, Closed system
FS SI SS LJ Closed system of communication among student intern, faculty and site supervisor using Live Journal STUDENT INTERN FACULTY SUPERVISOR SITE SUPERVISOR LIVE JOURNAL
3 - Multiple linked courses • Individual posts • Determine accessibility • Personalize format • Interactive
Model 3 Multi-group, Multi-individual, Two-way communication, Closed System
COR A I / A COR B COR A CPN B CPN A CPN I / A CAP B CAP A CAP I / A COR B I / A PROGRAM COORDINATOR Closed system of communication among six linked courses
4 - Asynchronous course discussion board as one element of course
Discussion board requirements • Instructor generated question • Students respond to question • Students respond to peers input • Needs: • Ease • Interactive • Security level – limit to class members
Discussion software • Shareware • Free • Easy to structure/maintain • No security • Local sys op • WebCT • Not free • Not intuitive • Sys op • Limited to class members • Limited to semester
Model 4a Multi-group, Two-way Communication, Closed system
Closed system of communication among class members CLASS MEMBERS INSTRUCTOR LJ TOPIC
Model 4b • Expand system • Add other groups (classes)
LIVE JOURNAL “ TOPIC” INSTRUCTOR Closed system of communication among multiple classes CLASS A CLASS BCLASS C
Open system • Open discussion to “digital community”
Model 5 Multi-user, Two-way Communication, Open system
“TOPIC” INST. Open system of communication including multiple classes CLASS A CLASS C CLASS B
Cautions • Determine pedagogical use • Determine logic structure • Select software
Thank you! Questions???? Margaret D. Anderson Psychology Department SUNY Cortland, NY 13045 andersmd@cortland.edu