1 / 12

Choosing Supervisory Tools

Choosing Supervisory Tools. Solange Berstein Chair IOPS Technical Committee Superintendent Pension Supervisor Chile. Agenda. Goals of interventions and sanctions Decision making process Supervisory stance by area Supervisory stance by entity Ensuring consistency and proportionality

abram
Télécharger la présentation

Choosing Supervisory Tools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Choosing Supervisory Tools SolangeBerstein Chair IOPS Technical Committee Superintendent Pension Supervisor Chile

  2. Agenda • Goals of interventions and sanctions • Decision making process • Supervisory stance by area • Supervisory stance by entity • Ensuring consistency and proportionality • Powers of the Supervisor • Sanctions • Intervention • Information disclosure

  3. Goals of Intervention and Sanctions • There is a well defined strategic supervisory goals for the use of intervention, enforcement and sanction powers • Look after the fiduciary responsibility of managers which leads to protect members.

  4. Decision Making Process • Analyzing and evaluating the data • Supervision Guides, criteria and best practices • Supervision Committees • Updated risk matrix by institution • Ad-hoc analytical applications • Reporting issues and concerns and following up improvements programs • Risk Evaluation Summary (RER), including the institution main strengths and weaknesses by risk factor and the supervisor concerns • Meetings with each Board of Directors and key managers to share RER and ask for improvement plans • Supervision planning and following improving programs based on each risk matrix and those plans

  5. Decision Making Process Supervisory stance by area

  6. Decision Making Process SP Supervisory Stance by Entity

  7. Decision Making Process Supervisory stance according to global scoring Fifthlevel RequireIntervention Fourthlevel RequireUrgentImprovements Thirdlevel Vigilance Secondlevel Normal withminorconcerns Firstlevel Normal

  8. Ensuring Consistency and Proportionality • Supervision and Penalization Committee • It takes place monthly • To review every case and decide to charge and/or punish the involved institution • Integrated by the Superintendent, Supervision Intendant, Head of Legal Department, a lawyer secretary and the responsible supervision staff • A pre established sanction framework is used to set up the fines, based on the kind of problem, its severity and rate of recurrence • Every session is documented

  9. Powers: Sanction • The Superintendence has the power to sanction an AFP if incurred in any infraction of the regulation. According to Chilean Administrative Law is requirement to sanction an AFP that Superintendence carries an administrative proceeding. • Phases of the administrative proceeding: • Formulation of charges • Responses to charges (discharges) • Burden of pleading • Issuance of the final resolution (sanction or dismissal of the infraction) • Types of sanctions: • Administrative admonition • Censure • Fines • Revocation of the license of the AFP Fines and revocation of the license of the AFP could be reconsidered through a claim files with the Appeal Court.

  10. Powers: Intervention • The Superintendence has the power to appoint an Inspector to protect the safety of the Pension Funds of the AFP. The appointment of the Inspector requires a reasonable resolution issued by the Superintendence. • Characteristics of the Inspector:Employee of the Superintendence; Appointed by no more than six months, extended by one period of six months • Some causes to appoint an Inspector:Reiterative material sanctions or fines incurred by AFPs; not to comply with the rules or instructions of the Superintendence; vacancy of the most members of the AFP’s board of directors; filing of bankruptcy or declaration of bankruptcy of an AFP; deficit of legal reserve or minimum net worth. • Powers of the Inspector:Authorize all operation activities of the AFP; suspend any decision of the board of director or management that danger the safety of the Pension Funds

  11. Information Disclosure • A significant amount of information on RBS as well as compliance based supervision is published by the Superintendency on the web site. • First meeting with key managers or formal communication to announce each supervision actions, goals and scope and to assure collaboration • Risk Based Evaluation Summary (RER) is shared with the key managers and Board of Directors for comments and feedback • When there is a concern for the supervisor, a formal, structured, documented, timely process is triggered • Warnings are timely communicated to the entities • Censures and fines become public on the web

  12. Choosing Supervisory Tools SolangeBerstein Chair IOPS Technical Committee Superintendent Pension Supervisor Chile

More Related