1 / 87

Special Inspection in Michigan

To insert your company logo on this slide From the Insert Menu Select “Picture” Locate your logo file Click OK To resize the logo Click anywhere inside the logo. The boxes that appear outside the logo are known as “resize handles.” Use these to resize the object.

acacia
Télécharger la présentation

Special Inspection in Michigan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. To insert your company logo on this slide • From the Insert Menu • Select “Picture” • Locate your logo file • Click OK To resize the logo • Click anywhere inside the logo. The boxes that appear outside the logo are known as “resize handles.” • Use these to resize the object. • If you hold down the shift key before using the resize handles, you will maintain the proportions of the object you wish to resize. Special Inspection in Michigan Presented by: Ronald LaMere, P.E. BKBM Engineers, Minneapolis rlamere@bkbm.com

  2. Council of American Structural Engineers • CASE is a committee of the American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC). • About 300 member firms. • Improve quality, profitability and business practices of structural engineering firms. • website: www.acec.org/about/case

  3. CASE/Minnesota • Committee of ACEC/Minnesota. • About 50 member firms. • The structural engineering association for Minnesota (technical and business). • No direct association with CASE National. • website: www.acecmn.org/committees/casemn

  4. Presentation Format • Making the CASE for Special Inspection • History of Special Inspection • CASE and CASE/MN Approaches • Team Roles • Special Inspection Program Implementation • Uniformity and Buy-in • More Questions and Answers

  5. Purpose • Special Structural Inspection provides greater confidence that the contractor’s work complies with the structural engineer’s drawings, specifications and design intent.

  6. Making a CASE for Special Inspections • Code Requirement (Mandatory) • Public Safety • Cost Implications • Additional Benefits

  7. Making a CASE for Special Inspections • 2003 IBC Chapter 17 – Structural Tests and Special Inspections

  8. Making a CASE for Special InspectionsPublic Safety • U.S. House Report 98-621 (Structural Failures in Public Facilities, 1984) identified over 20 contributing factors, the following two as most critical: • The need for improved organization on construction projects and better communication between participants. • The need for construction inspection by the Structural Engineer of Record during the construction of principal structural components. Therefore, SER involvement is not self-promotion.

  9. Making a CASE for Special InspectionsCost • Do Special Inspections increase traditional inspection and testing costs? • Yes, these tasks have been expanded by Code. • Special Inspection/testing generally runs 3/8% to 3/4% of construction cost. • Same order of magnitude as design fees. • Many tasks were performed prior.

  10. Making a CASE for Special InspectionsCost • Can Special Inspections performed by the SER reduce total project construction costs? • Yes. Potential cost savings are just one aspect. • All parties benefit from the SER’s involvement. • Cost difference between SER and other “qualified” personnel is modest. • If need to do, DO IT RIGHT!

  11. Making a CASE for Special InspectionsAdditional Benefits of SER Participation • As the Special Inspector, the SER can: • Communicate modifications before constructed. • Provide prompt responses to field questions. • Expedite corrections to construction errors. • Improve design-construction team working relationships. • Reduce misinterpretation of design intent.

  12. Owner Benefits • Higher quality • Lower overall project cost • Potentially offset special inspections fee • Faster delivery • Less litigation potential

  13. Architect/Prime Designer Benefits • Fewer RFI’s to process • Fewer CO’s to explain • Potential fee increase/mark-up for retaining SER • Potential to do some SI in-house

  14. Contractor Benefits • Fast decisions • Less re-work • Better planning • Smoother running project

  15. Structural Engineer Benefits • Reduced liability • Increased work with minimal selling • Additional scope/fee • Hourly rate basis plus reimbursable expenses • Reduce fee for overlap with basic services • Avoid fixing contractor mistakes for free!

  16. Financial Benefit • Example - $10 million / 80,000 s.f. school • CMU Bearing Walls • Steel Beams/Precast Plank Floor • Steel Beams/Open Web Joists/Steel Deck Roof

  17. Financial Benefit • Basic SE fee = $60,000 • Profit = $6,000 (10%) • SI fee = $15,000 (CMU/Conc. Reinf.) • Profit = $3,000 (20%) • Reduced free “fixes” • Added Profit = $1,500 (varies) • Net Profit increased to $10,500 (75%)

  18. Building Official Benefits • Greater confidence that work complies with the engineer’s design intent.

  19. A Brief HistoryRequirements and Established Procedures • 1927 UBC created and included inspections • 1961 UBC Special Inspection inception • 1988 UBC required inclusion in the CD’s • 1993 BOCA included Special Inspections • 2000 IBC expanded requirements • 2003 IBC modifies some requirements • 2003 NFPA 5000 expands SER’s role • 2006 IBC expands/clarifies

  20. A Brief HistoryWest Coast Experience • 1927 UBC required a “Registered Inspector” • 1961 Special Inspection Inception • Program administered by Building Official • Testing/Inspection agencies certified by ICBO/ICC • Limited involvement by SER/RDP

  21. A Brief HistoryMinnesota Experience • 1989 - New emphasis on enforcing special inspection code requirements by MN Bldg. Codes and Standards Division • 1990 - State code (UBC 1988) includes “Special Inspection Guidelines” • 1993 - CASE/MN - “Guidelines for Structural Testing and Special Inspection” • 2003 - “Guideline Program for Structural Testing and Special Inspection, 4th edition” • Strong support from State, but still varied involvement by SER

  22. CASE Position Statement • “The on-site presence of the SER through Special Inspections is the best means to protect the public and improve quality.” • “The SER should serve as the Special Inspector whenever possible and practical.”

  23. CASE Position • Overall SI process/program should be managed by a single Special Inspector. • The Special Inspector may perform the required inspections or retain agents.

  24. Minnesota Approach • Distinguish testing from inspection and have two separate agents • Special Inspector-Technical (testing) • Special Inspector-Structural (judgment) • The SER should perform specific SI-S inspections when possible and practical • SER not required to manage entire program

  25. CASE/MN Approach Clear Definitions are Important • Testing: The analysis of materials in accordance with approved standards to determine compliance with the contract documents. • Inspection: The evaluation of materials and workmanship based on the application of engineering judgment.

  26. Slightly Different Approaches • CASE advocates single/overall Special Inspector/Manager concept. • Minnesota has separation of testing vs. inspection roles. • Both intend strong leadership role by SER.

  27. Slightly Different Approaches • CASE’s sole-source SI Program management is ideal. • SER firms may not have time/staff to manage entire process. • Minnesota method facilitates SER’s direct involvement with more limited role. • Minnesota focuses SER’s involvement to inspections requiring engineering “judgment”.

  28. Special Inspection Team Roles • Owner • Prime Professional/RDP in responsible charge (often Architect) • Structural Engineer • Contractor • Building Official • Testing Agency • Special Inspector

  29. Team Roles-Owner • The Owner, not the Contractor, must retain and pay for Special Inspections. • Can delegate the RDP to serve as the Owner’s agent and retain/pay for SI.

  30. Team Roles-Prime Professional/RDP • Inform Owner of the requirement for SI. • Assist in establishing budget for SI. • Assist in retaining SI agents. • Facilitate SER’s involvement in SI.

  31. Team Roles-Structural Engineer • Prepare the Statement of Special Inspections • Define specific tests/inspections/qualifications • Assist with budgeting – limit surprises. • Review special inspection and testing reports. • Serve as Special Inspector, if practical.

  32. Team Roles-Contractor • Cooperate with special inspection and testing agents. • Schedule inspections and tests. • Provide safe access for agents. • Review special inspection and testing reports. • Correct deficiencies identified.

  33. Team Roles-Building Official • Require completed Statement of Special Inspections prior to Permit issue. • Review special inspector qualifications. • Review interim reports. • Review fabricator’s certificate of compliance. • Require Final Report of Special Inspections prior to Certificate of Occupancy issue.

  34. Team Roles-Testing Agency • Testing technicians should “test” and not ‘inspect”. • An important role, but not a substitute for engineering judgment.

  35. Team Roles-Special Inspector • Manage the entire Special Inspection Program (CASE National approach). • Manage separate SI-Testing or SI-Inspection elements. (Minnesota approach). • Conduct a pre-construction meeting. • Perform specific inspections using the Contact Documents. • Determine if fabricator has acceptable QA Program to reduce/eliminate Special Inspection.

  36. Team Roles-Special Inspector • Coordinate testing and inspection agents. • Bring discrepancies to immediate attention of Contractor. • Verify discrepancies are corrected, else notify SER (and building official) in timely manner. • Collect, review, and submit interim reports to Building Official, SER, Owner, etc. • Prepare Final Report of Special Inspections.

  37. Special Inspector-Qualifications • Expertise in the structural system being inspected. • Conveys a false sense of security if not done properly.

  38. Qualifications • Engineering training and experience critical for inspections requiring judgment. • ICBO certification programs. • ACI, AWS, and ASNT certification programs.

  39. Conflict of Interest? • It is a conflict of interest for the Contractor to hire the Special Inspector and testing laboratory. • It is nota conflict of interest for the SER to serve as the Special Inspector. • Minnesota Bldg. Code specifically states that a qualified SER can serve as a Special Inspector.

  40. Background Summary • The purpose of Special Inspection is to provide greater confidence that the Contractor’s work complies with the Structural Engineer’s drawings, specifications and design intent. • Not a “Peer Review” of design. • The SER has the greatest stake and desire to see the design intent achieved. • No conflict of interest for SER to perform SI.

  41. What’s Required? • Special Inspection Program/Statement of SI are required for building permit. • Includes actual materials/work, specific inspections, qualifications, specific agents, reporting procedures. • Prepared/tailored by RDP in responsible charge for specific project’s materials.

  42. How to Implement? • Several programs already exist. • Build on existing methods. • Focus on CASE National and CASE/Minnesota approaches.

  43. Implementation – CASE Method • Third Edition changed title: Guide to Special Inspections and Quality Assurance Available to download on website: www.acec.org/about/case-committees

  44. Implementation-CASE Method • Useful forms on website: • Statement of Special Inspections • Schedule of Special Inspection Services for all Materials and Systems • Qualifications of Inspectors and Testing Technicians • Final Report of Special Inspections

  45. Implementation-CASE/MN Method • Incorporate the CASE/MN Guideline Programinto projects consistently. Various methods: • Edit into specifications • Separate stand alone program • Summarize (don’t specify) in structural notes www.acecmn.org,committees/CASEMN

  46. CASE/MN Specifications • Section 01410 Special Structural Testing & Inspection

  47. CASE/MN Specifications • Why not just reference inspections stated in Chapter 17 tables? • The tables do not identify the specific levels of inspection to verify compliance.

  48. Example – Concrete Construction • IBC Table 1704.4, Item 1. Inspection of reinforcing steel, including prestressing tendons, and placement. • Actual Program to include the following inspections: • Bar size and grade • Spacing, location, clearance • Free of excessive rust, dirt, oil, damage • Properly supported • Lap lengths and locations • Mechanical splices • Epoxy coating • Post-tensioning has even more requirements • Else compliance is open to different interpretations by different inspectors!

  49. CASE/MN Specifications • PART 1 - GENERAL • 1.1 Intent and Conditions • 1.2 Related Requirements • 1.3 Definitions Special Inspector - Technical I, II, III - Usually an employee of a testing agency. Special Inspector – Structural I, II - Usually an employee of the SER firm.

  50. CASE/MN Specifications • PART 1 (continued) • 1.4 References • 1.5 Responsibilities • 1.6 Payment • Owner or Architect/Engineer of record, acting as Owners agent, will directly employ and pay for services of special inspectors. • 1.7 Inspection Notice • Minimum 24 hours • 1.8 Reports • Date issued, Project title, Firm / SI name • Specific locations, types, results • Statement of compliance

More Related