1 / 29

H yper T ext T ransfer P rotocol ( HTTP ) Deepti Kulkarni

H yper T ext T ransfer P rotocol ( HTTP ) Deepti Kulkarni CISC 856: TCP/IP and Upper Layer Protocols Fall 2008 Acknowledgements Professor Amer Richi Gupta. Motivation ?. Single informational network Light protocol Speed. Tim-Berners Lee Director of the W3C. HTTP Versions.

achapman
Télécharger la présentation

H yper T ext T ransfer P rotocol ( HTTP ) Deepti Kulkarni

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Deepti Kulkarni CISC 856: TCP/IP and Upper Layer Protocols Fall 2008 Acknowledgements Professor Amer Richi Gupta

  2. Motivation ? • Single informational network • Light protocol • Speed Tim-Berners Lee Director of the W3C HTTP Versions Format : HTTP/<major>.<minor> • HTTP/0.9 – No RFC • HTTP/1.0 – RFC 1945 • HTTP/1.1 – RFC 2616 2

  3. Position of HTTP in the TCP/IP Protocol suite Application-layer Transport layer IGMP ICMP Network layer IP ARP RARP Data link layer Physical layer

  4. Quick overview of HTTP • Generic protocol for communication • Stateless protocol • In-band protocol • control information is sent in-band (unlike FTP) • Pull protocol • pulls information from the server (unlike SMTP which is push protocol)

  5. Client-Server protocol Server running Apache Web server HTTP Request/Response are over TCP connections HTTP Response HTTP Request PC running Explorer/MAC running Navigator

  6. Request Line Status Line General Headers General Headers Request Headers Response Headers Entity Headers Entity Headers A Blank Line A Blank Line Body Body A-PDU format Request Message Response Message Note: Each line ends with ‘cr lf ‘ control characters.

  7. A-PDU format (cont’d) space space Request Line Request Type URL HTTP version Request Type GET, HEAD, POST, PUT , TRACE , CONNECT , OPTION space Header Name : Header Value Header format Date , Pragma, Cache control ,Connection, MIME-version, Upgrade, Transfer encoding General Header From, Referer, User-agent, Authorization, If-Modified-Since, Accept Request Header Entity Header Content-length, Content-type, Content- encoding, Last-modified, Expires, Upgrade Response Header Location, Age, Retry-after, Server

  8. A-PDU format (cont’d)… space space Status Line HTTP Version Status Code Status Phrase 1xx: Informational Continue (100) , Switching Protocols(101) 2xx: Success - action was successfully received, understood, and accepted Created (201), Accepted (202), No Content (204), OK (200) 3xx: Redirection - further action needed to complete request Moved Permanently (301) , Moved Temporarily (302), Not Modified (304) 4xx: Client Error - request contains bad syntax or cannot be fulfilled Bad Request (400), Unauthorized (401), Forbidden (403), Not Found (404) 5xx: Server Error - server failed to fulfill an apparently valid request Internal Server Error (500), Not Implemented (501), Bad Gateway (502), Service Unavailable (503)

  9. Variations of HTTP • Nonpersistent connections • with serial connections • with parallel connections • Persistent connections • without pipelining • with pipelining

  10. Nonpersistent (HTTP /1.0 default)

  11. OK Client Server SYN SYN-ACK 3-way handshake ACK GET web page HTTP/1.0 Get web page Web page Web page transferred Client parses HTML web page FIN Ack Data ACK Connection close FIN ACK 1.Found referenced object “Image 1” 2. Found referenced object “Image 2”

  12. FIN FIN ACK ACK FIN FIN ACK ACK Nonpersistent (cont’d) Client Client Server Server SYN SYN SYN-ACK SYN-ACK 3-Way Handshake 3-Way Handshake ACK ACK Get image2 Get image1 GET image1 HTTP/1.0 GET image2 HTTP/1.0 Image2 Image1 OK OK Image 2 Transferred Image 1 Transferred Connection close Connection close Ack Data

  13. Key points • Connection does not persist for other objects • Connections are sequential

  14. Rough calculation for number of RTTS Client Server Web Page Can we reduce the number of RTTS? Image 1 Image 2 Delay due to connection request/handshake Time delay in RTTs = 6 Delay Due to HTML Page Request Delay Due to Object Request

  15. Nonpersistent with parallel connections( browser dependent)

  16. FIN FIN FIN ACK ACK ACK FIN FIN FIN ACK ACK ACK Client Server Client Client Server Server SYN SYN SYN SYN-ACK SYN-ACK SYN-ACK 3-Way Handshake 3-Way Handshake 3-Way Handshake ACK ACK GET web page HTTP/1.0 GET image2 HTTP/1.0 GET image1 HTTP/1.0 Get image2 Get image1 Get web page Client parses HTML web page Web page OK OK OK Image2 Image1 Image 1 Transferred Image 2 Transferred Web page Transferred 1. Referenced object “Image 1” 2. Referenced object “Image 2” Connection close Connection close Connection close Parallel connections Ack Data

  17. Rough calculation Client Server Web page Image1 & Image2 Time delay in RTTs = 4 Delay due to connection request/handshake Delay due to HTML page request Delay due to object request

  18. Disadvantages: • Overhead of multiple TCP connections. • A busy server could end up with lots of connections in the ‘TIME-WAIT’ state • Rarely does each connection get past the ‘slow-start’ region • Failure to use the full end-to-end available bandwidth • Extra time opening connections increases user-perceived latency

  19. Persistent without pipelining

  20. Connection close FIN ACK FIN ACK Client Server GET image2 HTTP/1.1 SYN Get image2 SYN-ACK 3-Way Handshake OK Get web page GET web page HTTP/1.1 GET image1 HTTP/1.1 Image 2 Transferred Get image1 Image2 Image1 OK OK Web page Web page Transferred Image 1 Transferred Timer started Timer started Timer started Timer started Time Out Ack Data Note: 1) Requests are sequential 2) Timer is at application layer 20

  21. Rough calculation Client Server Web page Image1 Image2 Time delay in RTTs = 4 Delay due to connection request/handshake Delay due to HTML page request Delay due to object request

  22. Persistent with pipelining

  23. Image 1 Connection close Image 1 FIN ACK FIN ACK Client Server SYN GET image1 HTTP/1.1 SYN-ACK 3-Way Handshake Get image1 GET image2 HTTP/1.1 Get web page GET webpage HTTP/1.1 Get image2 ACK ACK OK Web page Web page Transferred OK Back to back requests Client parses web page; Gets Image 1 Gets Image 2 Image 2 OK Timer started Timer started Image 2 Time Out Note: Requests are serviced in order Ack Data

  24. Rough calculation Client Server Web page 24 Image1 & Image2 Time delay in RTTs = 3 Delay due to connection request/handshake Delay due to HTML page request Delay due to object request

  25. Advantages: • Fewer connections • Reduced network traffic • CPU time is saved in routers and hosts • Less overhead for the servers • Reduced perceived latency for clients on subsequent requests • Either client or server can close the connection • Disadvantages: • Connections stay open longer at the server

  26. Experimental Results (NP HTTP/1.0) without parallel connections (Persistent without pipelining) (Persistent with pipelining) Network Latency (seconds) Number of in lined images Figure 6-1: Latencies for a remote server, image size = 2544 bytes

  27. Experimental Results (cont’d) (NP HTTP/1.0) without parallel connections (Persistent without pipelining) (Persistent with pipelining) Network Latency (seconds) Number of in lined images Figure 6-2: Latencies for a remote server, image size = 45566 bytes

  28. Questions? Thanks

  29. Example Of Request/Response Lets have a live demo! • telnet cis.poly.edu 80 • GET /~ross/ HTTP/1.1 Host: cis.poly.edu

More Related