1 / 3

Privatisation In Australia

Privatisation In Australia. Criminal justice system (CJS) privatisation or more recently contestability varies among OECD countries (Harding, 2001; Mason, 2013) Most similar countries: Australia and England/Scotland

ada
Télécharger la présentation

Privatisation In Australia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Privatisation In Australia Global Centre for Evidence-Based Corrections and Sentencing, September, 2013 • Criminal justice system (CJS) privatisation or more recently contestability varies among OECD countries (Harding, 2001; Mason, 2013) • Most similar countries: Australia and England/Scotland • In Australia, research suggests that the private sector has assisted in public sector reform via modeling( OIC, 2009; Harding, 1997; Rynne, 2004) • Actual CJSregime reform is unknown as the two systems deliver on different standards and are not compared on similar indicators. • In its current guise, the public sector structure renders it unable to be held accountable to, or deliver services to, the same standards as the the private sector (English, Baker & Broadbent, 2010).

  2. Research Gaps Global Centre for Evidence-Based Corrections and Sentencing, September, 2013 • System Wide Contestability • Genuine contestability across the whole system: • Custodial • Community • PbR/Social Impact Bonds/Public Sector Mutuals • Through-the-gate innovation • Innovation in combining service delivery between custodial and community re-entry. • Open and Independent Inspection. • Cultural resilience in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander prisoners: • Justice reinvestment tied to Elders and Respected delivering specific programmes and non-custodial/deterrence approaches on a commercial/payment by results approach.

  3. What Next Effective CJS governance will move towards filling this knowledge gap. Global Centre for Evidence-Based Corrections and Sentencing, September, 2013 • Mandated cross sector pathways for transfer of ‘what works’. • Unified data on actual system performance: • Privatisation indicates performance measures can be designed for more than ‘input/output’ effectiveness and efficiency measures: • Measures of behavioral and qualitative change • Knowledge shared across all relevant agencies • Police • Juveniles • Mental Health

More Related