1 / 6

Discussant K.C. John Wei HKUST 2010 NTU Conference, December 10, 2010

R&D, Risks and Overreaction in a Market where the Book-to-Market Effect is Reputedly Absent by Sheng-Tang Huang Weifeng Hung Chaoshin Chiao Tung-Liang Liao. Discussant K.C. John Wei HKUST 2010 NTU Conference, December 10, 2010. Summary of findings.

adamski
Télécharger la présentation

Discussant K.C. John Wei HKUST 2010 NTU Conference, December 10, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. R&D, Risks and Overreaction in a Market where the Book-to-Market Effect is Reputedly Absentby Sheng-Tang Huang Weifeng HungChaoshin ChiaoTung-Liang Liao Discussant K.C. John Wei HKUST 2010 NTU Conference, December 10, 2010

  2. Summary of findings • In the whole sample, there is no book-to-market effect in Taiwan as documented by Chiu and Wei (1998) and others • However, in a subsample of firms with low R&D-to-sales ratios, there does exist the book-to-market effect • Explanation: the book-to-market effect arises from fundamental reversal, which is caused investor overreaction as suggested by Lakonishok, Shleifer, and Vishny (1994).

  3. Comments and Suggestions • Although there is no value premium in Taiwan as a whole, this study digs deep to find that there does exit a value premium in a subsample of firms with low R&D intensity. • I find the results of the paper interesting.

  4. Comments and Suggestions • However, the theoretical link between the empirical results and theory is quite weak. • What are the reasons that R&D can affect the book-to-market effect? • If your argument is correct, we should also observe that the value premium should be very weak in the Nasdaq firms. But I do not think that it is the case.

  5. Comments and Suggestions • Since your argument is mainly behavioral, then the behavior story predicts that the value premium should be stronger for firms with more information uncertainty. • However, your result seems to be inconsistent with this prediction.

  6. Conclusion • It is an interesting paper that finds that the book-to-market effect does exist in low R&D firms • However, how to reconcile the empirical results and the prediction of a theory is a challenge

More Related