1 / 165

Review for Final

Review for Final. Logic. Deductive Validity. We say that an argument is deductively valid when it has the following property: If the premises of the argument are true, then the conclusion of the argument must be true.

adem
Télécharger la présentation

Review for Final

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Review for Final

  2. Logic

  3. Deductive Validity We say that an argument is deductively valid when it has the following property: If the premises of the argument are true, then the conclusion of the argument must be true. A valid argument is “truth-preserving”: the truth of the premises gets passed on to the conclusion.

  4. Invalidity An argument that is not valid is called invalid. Valid: If the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. Invalid: The premises can be true while the conclusion is false.

  5. Soundness A sound argument is one that (i) is valid and (ii) has true premises. Every sound argument is valid (by definition), but the reverse is not true. Some valid arguments are not sound.

  6. Comprehension Questions • Can arguments that are deductively valid have false conclusions? False premises? • Can arguments that are not deductively valid have true conclusions? True premises? • Can deductively sound arguments have false conclusions? • Can arguments that are not deductively sound still be deductively valid?

  7. Deductive Logic Deductive logic (often just called ‘logic’) is the study of deductively valid argument forms.

  8. Argument Forms Example Premise: Either Fred took the train or he took the ferry. Premise 2: Fred did not take the ferry. Conclusion: Fred took the train. Premise: Either A or B. Premise: not B Conclusion: A

  9. Sentential Logic Sentential Logic (SL, also known as Propositional Logic, or the Propositional Calculus) is a formal logical system that represents logical relations among sentences (or propositions).

  10. SL Connectives

  11. Definition of WFF • All sentence letters are WFFs. • If φ is a WFF, then ~φ is a WFF. • If φ and ψ are WFFs, then (φ & ψ), (φ v ψ), (φ → ψ), (φ ↔ ψ) are also WFFs. • Nothing else is a WFF.

  12. Negation

  13. Conjunction

  14. Disjunction

  15. Biconditional

  16. The Material Conditional

  17. Negation in English There are other ways of saying “My name is not Michael” in English that are all appropriately translated into SL using “~.” For example: • My name isn’t Michael • It’s false that my name is Michael. • It isn’t true that my name is Michael. • It isn’t the case that my name is Michael.

  18. Different Ways to Say “And” in English • P and Q. • P but Q. • Although P, Q. • P, also Q. • P as well as Q.

  19. “Or” in English There are some different ways of saying “or” in English. • P or Q. • Either P or Q. • P, unless Q. • Unless Q, P.

  20. Arrow → in English • If P then Q. • Q if P. • P only if Q. • Whenever P, Q. • Q provided that P. • P is sufficient for Q. • Q is necessary for P.

  21. Evaluations An evaluation is an assignment of truth-values to sentence letters. For example: • A = T • B = T • C = F • D = T • E = F • ...

  22. Evaluating a WFF You can determine the truth-value of a complex WFF from an evaluation. For example, consider the WFF: ((A ↔ P) v ~Q)

  23. Evaluating a WFF Suppose our evaluation says A = T, P = T, and Q = F. ((A ↔ P) v ~Q)

  24. Evaluation: Stage 1 Write down sentence letters.

  25. Evaluation: Stage 1 Insert truth-values from evaluation.

  26. Evaluation: Stage 2 Copy down the formula to evaluate.

  27. Evaluation: Stage 3

  28. Evaluation: Stage 3

  29. Evaluation: Stage 3

  30. Find a Connective You Can Evaluate

  31. Find a Connective You Can Evaluate Need to know values of these formulas.

  32. Find a Connective You Can Evaluate

  33. Biconditional

  34. Biconditional

  35. Find a Connective You Can Evaluate

  36. Find a Connective You Can Evaluate Need to know values of these formulas.

  37. Find a Connective You Can Evaluate

  38. Negation: Truth-Table

  39. Negation: Truth-Table

  40. Find a Connective You Can Evaluate

  41. Find a Connective You Can Evaluate Need to know values of these formulas.

  42. Disjunction

  43. Disjunction

  44. You’re Finished! This is the truth-value of the entire formula.

  45. Possibilities for One Sentence Letter

  46. Possibilities for Two Sentence Letters

  47. Possibilities for Three Sentence Letters

  48. Write Down All Possible Evaluations

  49. Copy beneath Sentence Letters

  50. Consult Truth-Table for Arrow

More Related