1 / 11

1 2 3 4 5

What were the key weaknesses of the Old Poor Law?. 1. 4. 5. 2. 1 2 3 4 5. 3. What was the nature of the attack on the Old Poor Law?. Was it Benthamite ideas or Malthusianism that posed the greater threat to the Old Poor Law?. Who were the key opponents of the OPL?.

adena-hampton
Télécharger la présentation

1 2 3 4 5

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. What were the key weaknesses of the Old Poor Law? 1 4 5 2 1 2 3 4 5 3

  2. What was the nature of the attack on the Old Poor Law? Was it Benthamite ideas or Malthusianism that posed the greater threat to the Old Poor Law? Who were the key opponents of the OPL? What were the theories of opponents of the OPL?

  3. What was the nature of the attack on the Old Poor Law? Was it Benthamite ideas or Malthusianism that posed the greater threat to the Old Poor Law? Who were the key opponents of the OPL? What were the theories of opponents of the OPL?

  4. Prestructural: The point or concept has not been understood. The student may have a number of unconnected ideas but cannot distinguish relevance. Unistructural: One relevant idea is explained. Can separate relevant from non-relevant ideas. May be a couple of simple and obvious connections but their significance isn’t grasped. Multistructural: Several relevant ideas on the topic. Several connections may be made but their significance to the whole isn’t grasped. Relational: Understands and explains complex relationships related to the idea or concept. Understands relationship of parts to the whole. Extended Abstract: Shows profound understanding. Transfer takes place. Makes new connections. Can apply to wider contexts and new applications.

  5. Opponents: Who is who?

  6. Opponents: Who is who? Thomas Malthus Jeremy Bentham David Ricardo Robert Owen Titus Salt Thm Paine Edwin Chadwick

  7. CardsortMatch the philosophers to their theories

  8. What was the nature of the attack on the Old Poor Law? Was it Benthamite ideas or Malthusianism that posed the greater threat to the Old Poor Law? Who were the key opponents of the OPL? What were the theories of opponents of the OPL?

  9. ICEBERG Was it Benthamite ideas or Malthusianism that posed the greater threat to the Old Poor Law?

  10. What was the nature of the attack on the Old Poor Law? Pick a statement and defend it. It's true because... • The attack on the Old Poor Law was largely selfish, self-centred and greedy: it was to reduce and keep small ratepayers contributions. • The attack was philosophical, it was about the fundamental ideals of relief. The attackers believed the Poor Law should alleviate poverty. • The attack was on the practical and systemic level. Localism was no longer an adequate response to poverty and its complexities. Mention at least two of: change/ continuity/ effective / diet / nutrition/ prevention / challenge / solutions

  11. What was the nature of the attack on the Old Poor Law? Was it Benthamite ideas or Malthusianism that posed the greater threat to the Old Poor Law? Who were the key opponents of the OPL? What were the theories of opponents of the OPL?

More Related