230 likes | 343 Vues
This presentation delves into the theoretical properties of Lyman-alpha (Lyα) cooling radiation, emphasizing its significance in gas cooling processes in astrophysical environments. Key topics include the interplay between gas temperature and cooling mechanisms, observable attributes of Lyα emission, and the implications for gas collapse dynamics. It also explores the outcomes of Monte Carlo simulations designed to analyze the emergent Lyα spectrum, along with a discussion on the frequency-dependent surface brightness profile and its relation to gas motion. The impact of intergalactic medium on observed spectra is also evaluated.
E N D
Theoretical Properties of Ly Cooling Radiation’Mark Dijkstra (CfA) Collaborators: Z. Haiman, M.Spaans & A. Lidz Texas Symposium, Melbourne
‘Theoretical Properties of Ly Cooling Radiation’Mark Dijkstra (CfA) Collaborators: Z. Haiman & M.Spaans . motivation Texas Symposium, Melbourne
‘Theoretical Properties of Ly Cooling Radiation’Mark Dijkstra (CfA) Collaborators: Z. Haiman, M.Spaans & Lidz Outline of talk • Gas cooling & Ly emission • Observable properties of Ly cooling emission (DHS 06a,b) • Observable properties of continuum cooling radiation (D, submitted to MNRAS) Texas Symposium, Melbourne
Gas cooling Primordial Cooling curve T < 6.e4 K: H cooling dominates Thoul & Weinberg ‘95 Texas Symposium, Melbourne
The Impact of Cooling on Gas Collapse • Adiabatic collapse: Gas shell virializes at r=rmax/2 And heated to virial T of halo • Turn on cooling mechanism tcool<<tdyn Gas cools to 1e4 K rapidly Thoul & Weinberg ‘95 Texas Symposium, Melbourne
The Impact of Cooling on Gas Collapse. • Gas collapses at T=1e4 K (no virial shock, for M<Mcrit) • Cooling @ T=1.e4 K is dominated by collisional excitation of H • Collisions to 2p and 2s states of H • 2p 1s: Ly cooling • 2s 1s: 2- emission Thoul & Weinberg ‘95 Texas Symposium, Melbourne
Gas cooling. • Gas cooling is dominated by Ly emission • Spatially extends up to ~100 kpc. • Luminosities in the range L=1e42-1e44 erg/s (Haiman et al ‘00, Fardal et al ‘01, Yang et al ‘06) Yang et al ‘06 Texas Symposium, Melbourne
Lyman Alpha ‘Blobs’ • Observed Spatially extended Ly emission up to ~ 100 kpc. • Several tens have been discovered at z=3-5. (e.g. Matsuda et al, 2004; Saito et al, 2006/2007) • Luminosities ~ 1e42-1e44 erg/s • Powered by cooling radiation? • Alternatives: • Obscured starburst/AGN • Shock heating by superwinds. • Fluoresence (next talk) Steidel et al. (2000) Texas Symposium, Melbourne
Ly Cooling Radiation: Properties • Observational signatures of cooling radiation? • Cooling clouds are optically thick to Ly-> radiative transfer (RT). Well studied problem (> 60 years) HARD Texas Symposium, Melbourne
Ly Transfer • A simple problem: a Ly source inside a uniform static neutral H cloud. • Calculate emerging spectrum Harrington ‘73, Neufeld ‘90, DHS06a • Generally no analytic solution can be found: • Monte-Carlo. Texas Symposium, Melbourne
Ly Transfer • Calculate Ly transfer through series of models representing cooling clouds • Goal: To extract basic properties of Ly cooling radiation • Use Monte-Carlo: follow individual photons through the collapsing cloud. • The code is reliable. Texas Symposium, Melbourne
Ly Transfer • Cute: deuterium • N_H=2e19 (static) Texas Symposium, Melbourne
Ly Cooling Radiation: Properties • Use Monte-Carlo method to calculate emerging Ly spectrum+surface brightness profiles. • Result 1: Radiative Transfer of Ly through collapsing (optically thick) gas results in a blueshift of the line. The opposite is true for outflows. • Frequency off-set of Ly-line constrains gas motion. Frequency-> Surface brightness Radius Texas Symposium, Melbourne Data: Smith & Jarvis, 2007
Ly Cooling Radiation: Properties • What if one can’t tell whether there is an off-set? • Ly cooling radiation has frequency dependent surface brightness profile: Red: reddest 15% of Ly Blue: bluest 15% of Lya Texas Symposium, Melbourne
Ly Cooling Radiation: Properties • Why a frequency dependent surface brightness profile? Texas Symposium, Melbourne
Ly Cooling Radiation: Properties • Caution: Spectra shown are affected by IGM. The impact of the IGM is non-trivial (e.g. Santos ‘04; D, Wyithe & Lidz ‘07) Texas Symposium, Melbourne
Ly Cooling Radiation: Properties • Has cooling radiation from cold accretion been seen? • Perhaps (e.g. talk by M.Rauch) • Saito et al’07 find asymmetric Ly profiles with enhanced blue emission. Texas Symposium, Melbourne
Ly Cooling Radiation: Properties • Cooling radiation seen? Wilman et al ‘05 Texas Symposium, Melbourne
Cooling Radiation: Properties Part II (=short) Texas Symposium, Melbourne
2- Cooling Radiation: Properties • 1 collisional excitation 1s2p is accompanied by 0.6 excitations 1s2s • 2s1s++, 2 photons have combined energy of 10.2 eV. • Results in continuum emission redward of Ly-a. The spectrum of this emission has been calculated by Spitzer & Greenstein (‘51) Texas Symposium, Melbourne
2- Cooling Radiation: Properties • How weak is continuum? Prominence of Ly line relative to continuum is quantified by the equivalent width (EW) EW=1000-1500 Å Emitted restframe EW However IGM opaque to Ly; Observed restframe EW EW< 200 Å Texas Symposium, Melbourne
2- Cooling Radiation: Properties • Shape of continuum can also ‘betray’ cooling Cooling powered or resonant scattering or recombination emission? Texas Symposium, Melbourne
‘Theoretical Properties of Ly-a Cooling Radiation’Mark Dijkstra (CfA) Collaborators: Z. Haiman & M.Spaans Summary • Gas cooling is accompanied by copious Ly emission (especially the ‘cold’ mode). • Observational signposts of this emission are: • Intrinsic blueshift of line • Steepening of surface brightness towards bluer Ly wavelength • Faint continuum redward of Ly with weird spectrum. • Caution: Absence does not immediately rule out cooling radiation. • Currently, no convincing observational evidence exists, but d/dt(almost convincing) > 0. Texas Symposium, Melbourne